Author Topic: good Intake ?  (Read 3043 times)

Offline TreeFrog

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2848
  • Can Ya HEMI Now! If you can't dodge it Ram it!
    • TreeFrog
good Intake ?
« on: June 06, 2016 - 10:16:44 AM »
I'm looking for an intake for my 360.

This engine is a crate (fairly stock) engine.

I would like something that will mount newer carbs (if I have an older style carb I could use the intake I have)

This is not a racing setup, and I am looking to keep the budget reasonable.



65 Satellite     361 Ruby Red Poly
72 Challenger    360 Top Banana     
73 Challenger    340 Triple Black
87 Dodge Ram     318 Blue
88 Dodge Ram     360 Grey (+)
04 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 4.7L Pewter Met.




Offline brasil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 257
Re: good Intake ?
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2016 - 11:42:40 AM »
The EDE Performer ...if I were you. Because you save some weight...and the Intake can be used for square and spread bore carbs.... ( TQ / Q Jet )...

Greetings Juergen

Offline TreeFrog

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2848
  • Can Ya HEMI Now! If you can't dodge it Ram it!
    • TreeFrog
Re: good Intake ?
« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2016 - 01:09:01 PM »
The spread/Square is one of the issues I am facing.

just never been a fan of adapter plates.
65 Satellite     361 Ruby Red Poly
72 Challenger    360 Top Banana     
73 Challenger    340 Triple Black
87 Dodge Ram     318 Blue
88 Dodge Ram     360 Grey (+)
04 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 4.7L Pewter Met.

Offline brasil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 257
Re: good Intake ?
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2016 - 03:19:12 PM »
 :iagree:

Greetings Juergen

Offline TreeFrog

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2848
  • Can Ya HEMI Now! If you can't dodge it Ram it!
    • TreeFrog
Re: good Intake ?
« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2016 - 03:49:21 PM »
how s the performance vs a stock intake?
65 Satellite     361 Ruby Red Poly
72 Challenger    360 Top Banana     
73 Challenger    340 Triple Black
87 Dodge Ram     318 Blue
88 Dodge Ram     360 Grey (+)
04 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 4.7L Pewter Met.

Offline 72bluNblu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1836
Re: good Intake ?
« Reply #5 on: June 06, 2016 - 07:26:27 PM »
Edelbrock Air Gap RPM intake. Pretty much outperforms everything unless you go to full single plane race style intakes. I've got one on the 340 in my Duster, works great. I drive it year round as well, it does take a little longer to get warmed up in the winter but not bad. Yes, I know, I live in California, but I also commute early in the morning and it's not unusual to have to scrape ice off my windshield before I go during the winter months.

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: good Intake ?
« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2016 - 09:52:10 PM »
Even the stock intake works great or the M1 dual plane alum whick is basically the stock intake in alum  . The LD340 is great too if you can find one , RPM or RPM Air Gar are great too

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: good Intake ?
« Reply #7 on: June 07, 2016 - 12:12:39 AM »
Never heard anything good about the Performer
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline YellowThumper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1633
  • I left the snow for this?
Re: good Intake ?
« Reply #8 on: June 07, 2016 - 11:44:30 AM »
I give the nod to the air gap intakes. With today's fuel blends any and all separation you can get to limit heat transfer to the carb will help to prevent fuel from boiling.

My2c
Mike
Removing the warning labels one at a time.
Nature will take care of the rest.

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: good Intake ?
« Reply #9 on: June 07, 2016 - 08:45:33 PM »
 :iagree: but hood clearance can be a problem

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline 72bluNblu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1836
Re: good Intake ?
« Reply #10 on: June 08, 2016 - 03:31:35 AM »
The Eddy Air Gap RPM actually has the same carb pad height as the regular RPM manifold, 5.35". So if an RPM clears so will the Air Gap. It's also only .05" taller than an LD340, and the same height as stock 340 manifold.

Here's a handy list I found...

Quote
Rating the Intakes for Performance on a 340 or 360.


Make--------------------------------------------------Port Size--------Carb Height------Weight

Edelbrock Performer #2176 ................................ .97" x 1.95" ........... 4.63" ......... 21.2 lbs.

Weiand Action-Plus #8007................................. 1.00" x 1.96" ........... 5.41" ......... 23.2 lbs.

Weiand #7510....................................................

Edelbrock #LD-4B............................................... 1.05" x 1.95" ........... 4.90" ........ 22.5 lbs.

Edelbrock Torker 340......................................... 1.00" x 2.10" ............ 4.90" ........ 22.0 lbs.

'1970' 340 'Stock' Cast Iron #3462848.............. 1.07" x 2.15" ............. 5.35" ....... 51.0 lbs.

'1968/1969' 340 'Stock' Cast Iron #2531915.... 1.07" x 2.15" ............. 5.35" ....... 51.0 lbs.

'1971' 340 'Stock' Cast Iron #3512100............. 1.07" x 2.15" .............. 5.35" ....... 49.5 lbs.


Weiand Stealth #8022....................................... 1.00" x 1.96" .............. 5.51" ....... 22.2 lbs.

Weiand X-Celerator #7510-X.............................

Holley Street Dominator #300-7.......................

Edelbrock Torker II #5076................................ .98" x 2.16" ................. 5.72" ....... 19.2 lbs.

Weiand #7507........................................................................................ 5.35"

Offenhauser 360* Equa-Flow .................

Offenhauser 360* Dual-Port #6006.................. 1.10" x 1.18" {Upper}... 5.20" ....... 22.0 lbs.
......................................................................... 1.10" x 0.75" {Lower}

Mopar Performance #4876335.......................... 1.07" x 2.15" ................5.25" ........ 19.6 lbs.

Edelbrock #LD-340............................................ 1.07" x 2.16" ............... 5.30" ........ 23.1 lbs.

Edelbrock Performer RPM #7176...................... 1.01" x 2.17" ............... 5.35".......... 21.0 lbs.

Weiand X-Celerator #7545............................... 1.10" x 2.08" ............... 5.07" ......... 22.0 lbs.

Weiand X-Terminator.......................................

Edelbrock Performer Air-Gap #7576................. 0.98" x 2.16" ............... 5.35" ......... 22.6 lbs.

Edelbrock Tarantula #TM-5............................... 1.08" x 2.17" .............. 5.73" .......... 21.0 lbs.

Offenhauser Port-O-Sonic #6073......................

Edelbrock Victor #2915..................................... 1.02" x 2.04" ............. 4.93" ........... 21.2 lbs.

Holley Strip Dominator #300-8.......................... 1.16" x 2.27".............. 5.50" ........... 23.0 lbs.

Mopar Performance M-1 #4876334 ....................................................... 5.56"........... 20.7 lbs.

Edelbrock Super Victor #2815........................... 0.98" x 2.15" ............. 6.30" ........... 21.5 lbs.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2016 - 03:38:22 AM by 72bluNblu »

Offline brasil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 257
Re: good Intake ?
« Reply #11 on: June 08, 2016 - 03:55:08 AM »
That list is great ! Also now we can see..that almost all aftermarket intakes  have smaller ports than the OEM intakes.....  so porting the aftermarket intake should be  nessecary...I think.

Greetings Jurgen