Author Topic: Noobie here, Cheapest most performance motor for dollar?  (Read 3369 times)

Offline bwhitejr

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
Noobie here, Cheapest most performance motor for dollar?
« on: February 21, 2006 - 12:20:29 PM »
Hi I am new to this forum. I am about to start on my 1970 Barracuda project car that doesn't have an engine and I was wondering which block has the greatest bang for the buck?  It will be a fairly radical street machine.

any opinions out there?

bwhitejr




Offline JimCuda

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 444
  • MOPAR > Move Over Plymouth Approaching Rapidly
Re: Noobie here, Cheapest most performance motor for dollar?
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2006 - 12:27:55 PM »
Did you have a price point that you were trying to stay under for just the motor alone?

Were you thinking stock performance?

Were you thinking more power? If so, do you have a horse power number in your head?

 :working:
Jim'Cuda

Offline bwhitejr

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
Re: Noobie here, Cheapest most performance motor for dollar?
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2006 - 12:47:20 PM »
12 Second car.

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Noobie here, Cheapest most performance motor for dollar?
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2006 - 02:16:29 PM »
basically more CI = less $ spent to get the same performance so 440 or 440 stroker

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline gomangoRT/SE

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 594
Re: Noobie here, Cheapest most performance motor for dollar?
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2006 - 04:00:00 PM »
 :iagree:   When in doubt......... go big.    440 or more cubic inches to obtain the higher dollar for dollar horsepower.   Small blocks are wonderful though.

Offline MEK-Dangerfield

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 20946
  • I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
Re: Noobie here, Cheapest most performance motor for dollar?
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2006 - 04:05:47 PM »
It would be easier to get a big block into the 12 second range, but you still have to spend some $$$ on upgrades.  :grinyes:

  Mike

Mike

1970 Challenger - SOLD
2016 SXT+.  1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.

kudakidd

  • Guest
Re: Noobie here, Cheapest most performance motor for dollar?
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2006 - 06:08:07 PM »
to build from scratch, a small block would be cheaper. Ma made a ton more (still are) small blocks hence cheaper part prices

Offline Follicly Challenged

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 153
Re: Noobie here, Cheapest most performance motor for dollar?
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2006 - 08:21:48 PM »
Better question for this might be " whats the most power can be had for this amount $$$$$$$", or something along those lines.
Remember, save some budget for the whole drivetrain combo, not just an engine, works better that way. TOTAL budget, then "engine alone" budget, usually then "some more too" unfortuneately !

Offline JimCuda

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 444
  • MOPAR > Move Over Plymouth Approaching Rapidly
Re: Noobie here, Cheapest most performance motor for dollar?
« Reply #8 on: February 22, 2006 - 12:14:30 AM »
12 second car is do-able just keep in mind that having a ton of horse power can make your car slower without the correct traction.

You could pick up a 402 motor minus the carb built and ready to drop in with 435HP for about 6k. That should get you into the 12 range I would imagine. Just work on the traction.

If your looking for a small block you can do a 360 minus the carb built and ready to drop in with 390HP for a little less than 5k. That should get you rockn as well.

Offline bwhitejr

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
Re: Noobie here, Cheapest most performance motor for dollar?
« Reply #9 on: February 22, 2006 - 05:38:48 AM »
I kinda always fancied the 340.  But I noticed the prices for parts are quite a bit more than the 360 and the 440.  Is there a reason for this?  PAW has entire 440 stroker engine kits for a reasonable price.  Does anyone have any experience with their kits?

bwhitejr

Offline EVIL72

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Noobie here, Cheapest most performance motor for dollar?
« Reply #10 on: February 22, 2006 - 07:18:45 AM »
ROB
1972 Dodge Challenger 340ci
1970 Pro Street Duster (Under Construction)

Offline 71383bee

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 149
Re: Noobie here, Cheapest most performance motor for dollar?
« Reply #11 on: February 22, 2006 - 12:30:13 PM »
As stated it all depends on what your willing to spend, but I would go a step further and ask what does the car have now. 

I know it does not have a motor, but what about the rest of the drivetrain?  My reasoning for this is that if the car was originally a 318 or a /6 powered car then it will be a bit more work to make the car perform as well as a 340 or big block car.  Even the 2 BBl 383 cars had larger torsion bars, heavier duty brakes, bigger radiator, larger rear ends, etc.  If this is a /6 or 318 car with the 18" radiator, 904 tranny, and the 7 1/4 rear end (grenade!) then there is alot more to it then sliding a BB, Hemi, or even a 340. 

71 - 383 FC7 Super Bee

Offline 71fish

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1600
  • Bless you..
    • Ken's 71fish
Re: Noobie here, Cheapest most performance motor for dollar?
« Reply #12 on: February 22, 2006 - 12:57:46 PM »
cheapest way to a 12 sec car is a 360 stroker. Single plane manifold. Ported Heads "J" heads will do the trick and a Demon 750 DP mechanical.
71fish - Nobody better than an E-BODY!!