Author Topic: 440 rods in a 383  (Read 5779 times)

Offline 68mopar

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 18
440 rods in a 383
« on: July 23, 2006 - 10:08:28 PM »
Hi Everyone,

Apart from finding the right pistons what other issues would I run into putting 440 rods into a 383 and what C I would you end up with. Also has anyone run Aluminium rods in a street engine.

Thanks




Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: 440 rods in a 383
« Reply #1 on: July 24, 2006 - 02:33:03 AM »
Alum rods have a very short life span , basically 50 - 100 MAX trip down the 1/4 mile , I do not recommend them for street use
 by using 440 rods in a 383 with no other changes you will have a 383 CI engine , rod length will not affect displacement , you will have a much higher rod ratio though @ 2 -1 instead of 1.78 approx , I assume you want to build a stroker so you would need to use Both the 440 rods & a different stroke crank like the 440 with a 3.75 stroke or longer   

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline moper

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2368
Re: 440 rods in a 383
« Reply #2 on: July 24, 2006 - 07:51:58 AM »
What he said. Aluminum rods have no business in a street engine. The 6.768 rods are a bit heavier too, so balancing will be harder (read as more $$). The swap isnt worth anything unless you do go bigger inches. 383+.030 will go 432 or so inches.. 4.28bore x 3.75 stroke. A 383 is just a destroked 426.

Offline moparnut

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2410
  • Nutin like a nice Piece of Hickory"Clint Eastwood
    • My Photo's
Re: 440 rods in a 383
« Reply #3 on: July 24, 2006 - 08:29:55 AM »
A 383 is just a destroked 426.
Is that true?I never heard that,thanks
70 Barracuda Gran Coupe,383-4bbl,# Match
2012 Subaru Forester
70 D100 Adventurer 383 pickup
02 F250 S'cab Powerstroke 7.3 4x4 6 speed Manual
06 Honda VTX1800S Spec 3

Offline Killer_Mopar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1886
Re: 440 rods in a 383
« Reply #4 on: July 24, 2006 - 10:03:53 AM »
Is that true?I never heard that,thanks

Not really true, when the 383 has the same stroke of a 426 then it has the cubic inches of the 426. However, the 426 is still a RB block and has a higher deck height and the mains are larger, so they are not the same engine. They could be the same engine if a rare 383 RB block is used....
70 Challenger R/T SE - The never-ending project........

Offline Challenger6pak

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4084
Re: 440 rods in a 383
« Reply #5 on: July 24, 2006 - 12:01:46 PM »
The general evolution of the B motor is 350, 361, 383, 400.  The RB evolution is 413, 426, 440. 
1969 Sport Satellite H code convertible, 1970 Cuda 440+6, 1970 Challenger R/T 440+6, 1970 Challenger 383 R/T auto, 1970 Challenger R/T 383 4 speed,1971 Challenger convertible.

Offline moper

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2368
Re: 440 rods in a 383
« Reply #6 on: July 24, 2006 - 02:44:16 PM »
Like they said, 383 is B, 426 is RB, but strickly speaking bore and stroke, a 426 is 4.25/3.75, the 383 is 4.25/3.37. I should have clarified..lol.

Offline 68mopar

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 18
Re: 440 rods in a 383
« Reply #7 on: July 24, 2006 - 04:22:57 PM »
Thanks for the info guys, I had no idea that nothing changed (displacement wise) by just changing the rods. Looks like I might have to start searching for a 440 crank as well, and my aluminium rod idea is out the window also.

Thanks again

Offline Challenger6pak

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4084
Re: 440 rods in a 383
« Reply #8 on: July 24, 2006 - 04:37:12 PM »
If you want to build a large cubic inch B motor use a 400 block.  In the long run it might be cheaper depending on what you want to do to just start with a 440. 
1969 Sport Satellite H code convertible, 1970 Cuda 440+6, 1970 Challenger R/T 440+6, 1970 Challenger 383 R/T auto, 1970 Challenger R/T 383 4 speed,1971 Challenger convertible.

Offline 68mopar

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 18
Re: 440 rods in a 383
« Reply #9 on: July 24, 2006 - 04:53:06 PM »
Thanks Challenger6pak, I've looked into that as well. But living in Australia has it's limitations when it comes to mopar stuff. 400 block are a rarity and I'm also on a massively small budget after my girlfriend and I brought a unit 6 months ago. It's looks like my engine might need a rebuild in the next few months and I was looking for a cheap option to get a few more cubes out of it. Might just go for a standard rebuild thought with a bit more compression.

Also what is the maximun compression ration I should go for if I only ran 98 octane fuel with cast iron heads

Thanks

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: 440 rods in a 383
« Reply #10 on: July 24, 2006 - 07:53:17 PM »
approx 10:1 , depending on cam used with 98 octane fuel

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline moper

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2368
Re: 440 rods in a 383
« Reply #11 on: July 26, 2006 - 01:35:16 PM »
440 Source has a kit for using the 383 block and getting a 457" from it. No oil ring support rings, and not too bad a rod/stroke ratio either. You would need to clearance the crank counterweights (cut down on the lathe), and do some clearancing on the block.

Offline 70RAGTOPR/T

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 421
Re: 440 rods in a 383
« Reply #12 on: July 27, 2006 - 11:04:29 AM »
I agree with Mopar.  Use 440 Source.  I'm building a stroked 383.  I would use the 400 but I have two 383 blockes in my garge.  440 Source has everything.  I think the cost was around $1350 w/ upgrades.  I provided the link below.


http://www.440source.com/