Are they really Mopars?

News:

  • Home
  • Help
  • Chat
  • Login
  • Register

    • « previous next »
    Pages: 1 [2]

    Author Topic: Are they really Mopars?  (Read 2019 times)

    Offline falcon50flier

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 124
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #15 on: August 22, 2006 - 10:09:35 AM »
    360 AMC is no relation to 360 mopar. I think it is a punched 343 (?) from the 290-343-390-401 series.

    AMCs did use the 727 (TorqueCommand?) behind the V-8s in the AMX/Javelins!
    Logged
    70 Challenger convertible
    518 cid Hemi, TF727, 3.73 Dana 60


    Offline jeryst

    • Resident
    • *****
    • Posts: 2032
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #16 on: August 22, 2006 - 10:32:05 AM »
    AMC was really wierd because they might use a Mopar transmission in a particular model for one year, then use a GM tranny in the same model for the next year. Guess you have to do a DNA test on each one to see who it's really related to.

    By the way, Jensen Interceptors used Chrysler 383 and 440 engines. Another cousin.
    Logged

    Offline garrett007

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 102
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #17 on: August 22, 2006 - 10:47:49 AM »
    The problem with restoring an AMC is that parts are alot harder to find and not much is being reproduced yet.
    Logged
    '68 Charger
    '70 Challenger RT/SE (non-running)
    '70 Challenger Deputy (non-running)
    '1979 Macho W150
    '96 Avenger - Gone
    '05 Town & Country
    '06 Charger R/T

    Offline MEK-Dangerfield

    • C-C.com Expert
    • ********
    • Posts: 20946
    • I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #18 on: August 22, 2006 - 03:50:49 PM »
    Quote from: garrett007 on August 22, 2006 - 10:47:49 AM
    The problem with restoring an AMC is that parts are alot harder to find and not much is being reproduced yet.

       :iagree:  :iagree:  :iagree:

     You said it!!!

      I have a friend with a Javelin, I feel sorry for him.  :grinyes:


      Mike
    Logged

    Mike

    1970 Challenger - SOLD
    2016 SXT+.  1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.

    Offline chrisII

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 255
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #19 on: August 22, 2006 - 04:45:58 PM »
    amc used chrysler auto transmisions (with amc spesific cases), ford starters, and i think alot of gm electrical (alt ect) the engines were all amc , but carbs were whatever was cheapest that year. the manual transmisions i dont know about, i think that was whatever was cheap also. even tho the engines were all amc, the V8 lifters do interchange with small block mopar. however amc did oil the valve train through the pushrod like a ford   :clueless:  . AMC was for the most part over the years a dependable simple cheap and economical car. the AMX , javalen , some gremlens, and some rebels were considered "muscle cars" and were quite fast, but the styling was, to be polite pretty unique..
    Logged

    Offline ESGEE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1448
    • 1970 Challenger RT/SE
      • SG´s site
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #20 on: August 22, 2006 - 05:32:59 PM »
    "but the styling was, to be polite pretty unique.."
     :iagree: 90% of then look like s...
    Logged
    70 Challenger RT/SE(Looking for 383 Magnum N0B196875)
    70 Challenger RT/SE(Looking for 383 Magnum N0B115166)
    70 Challenger SE(RT/SE clone)
    69 Charger RT/SE 4speed Trackpac
    70 Charger 500

    Offline rallyechall

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 390
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #21 on: August 23, 2006 - 06:24:58 AM »
    I don't think any other car could be outstyled by the Pacer.
    Logged

    cudahob

    • Guest
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #22 on: August 23, 2006 - 06:38:54 AM »
    It's Party Time, It's Excellent.  :smilielol: Shwwwwwwwwing
    « Last Edit: August 23, 2006 - 06:40:52 AM by cudahob »
    Logged

    Offline bigblock4speedman

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 263
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #23 on: August 23, 2006 - 06:49:32 AM »
    I think the AMC Pacer was part of their downfall!  My dad bought a new 70 Hornet SST , a few years later my brother bought it.  It had a 232 6 cylinder and tourqueflete, he put on headers, cam, milled the head, 2 or 4 brl, can'tremember, and shift kit.  That Hornet would pull the front wheels off the ground, and beat a lot of v8s around at the time!
    Logged
    Pages: 1 [2]
    « previous next »