Author Topic: B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited  (Read 3163 times)

Offline hobo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited
« on: September 05, 2006 - 10:33:04 PM »
Several items have been said to be different almost the same and the same for 70-74 Ebodys and 71-74 B bodys. Is the front floor pan the same? Will it interchange? Are the rails the same front? rear? Cowl? Firewall? I would like to know for sure for all of these items and if not what are the differences? Mostly i would like to know if a complete floor pan would be the same from a 71-74 B body to use in a 70-74 cuda?


Thanks again all




Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2006 - 01:06:42 AM »
cowl & firewall are the same
 not sure on the rest , the front frame rail I believe will swap
 floor pan is different for sure
 

corrected , the firewall is similar , cowl is different for sure , different plastic covers are used for both
 I still believe the floor is different
« Last Edit: September 07, 2006 - 05:02:26 PM by Chryco Psycho »

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline dougs bs23

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1691
Re: B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2006 - 01:18:09 PM »
hmmmmmm :clueless:  thought it was the other way around,,, floors are the same  cowls are different :dunno:
see Bill run  go Navy football///fly navy

Offline hobo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2006 - 05:52:56 PM »
hmmmmmm :clueless:  thought it was the other way around,,, floors are the same  cowls are different :dunno:



Now you know how i feel :clueless:

Offline PlumCrazy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 349
Re: B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited
« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2006 - 11:24:23 AM »
Cowl is different, front floor pans are the same.

Offline Challenger6pak

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4084
Re: B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited
« Reply #5 on: September 07, 2006 - 12:40:02 PM »
I did some measuring on my 72 Satellite and my 73 Challenger.  It doesn't look like they will interchange.  I thought they did; but they don't.  Chryco is right. 
« Last Edit: September 07, 2006 - 06:54:29 PM by Challenger6pak »
1969 Sport Satellite H code convertible, 1970 Cuda 440+6, 1970 Challenger R/T 440+6, 1970 Challenger 383 R/T auto, 1970 Challenger R/T 383 4 speed,1971 Challenger convertible.

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited
« Reply #6 on: September 07, 2006 - 04:53:07 PM »
then why are the seat bases different?
 I`ll shut up now , Yes the top of the cowl is different , , the firewall is very similar
« Last Edit: September 07, 2006 - 04:54:47 PM by Chryco Psycho »

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline MEK-Dangerfield

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 20946
  • I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
Re: B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited
« Reply #7 on: September 07, 2006 - 04:58:51 PM »
then why are the seat bases different?
 I`ll shut up now , Yes the top of the cowl is different , , the firewall is very similar


OK Neil,

  I'm with you here. The seats bases are different between E and B-bodies, so it only makes sense that the floors would be too. The B-Body seems like it would be a tad bigger on the floor pans too. What did I miss??


   Mike

Mike

1970 Challenger - SOLD
2016 SXT+.  1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2006 - 05:00:56 PM »
the width would be similar , it may be the same length to the body seam but doubtful , but the seat bases are different so the floor should be too

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline PlumCrazy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 349
Re: B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited
« Reply #9 on: September 07, 2006 - 06:32:35 PM »
the width would be similar , it may be the same length to the body seam but doubtful , but the seat bases are different so the floor should be too

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited
« Reply #10 on: September 07, 2006 - 07:09:50 PM »
weird

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline hobo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2006 - 02:03:03 PM »


In my 71 parts book they say they are the same also. Does anyone have 72-74 parts book to see if they are the same floor pan?

Thanks Again All

Offline Challenger6pak

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4084
Re: B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited
« Reply #12 on: September 15, 2006 - 06:15:30 PM »
I did some research and car comparing. Here's what I found out.  The 71 and 72 B-body and all E-bodies share the same front floor pans.  This is true for the 2 dr, 4 dr. or wagon B-body.  In 73 the B-body got it's own front floor pan and the E ,of course, stayed the same.  The B front floor pan appears to be mounted lower in the body causing the need for different seat brackets.  The center trans tunnel is different in the rear portion from B to E.  The rear pans are shorter in the Cuda over the Challenger. The trans tunnel is also shorter in the Cuda.  All frame rails are different between the E and B-body.
1969 Sport Satellite H code convertible, 1970 Cuda 440+6, 1970 Challenger R/T 440+6, 1970 Challenger 383 R/T auto, 1970 Challenger R/T 383 4 speed,1971 Challenger convertible.

Offline hobo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: B/E Body sheetmetal interchange revisited
« Reply #13 on: September 27, 2006 - 12:45:55 PM »
Thanks 6pak This is what i was thinking i just was not to sure i know in my parts book it lists the front pan as the same part #..