Author Topic: Burnouts: Asphault vs. Concrete  (Read 5048 times)

Offline zerfetzen

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 393
  • 'Cuda, should'a, would'a...you lost.
Burnouts: Asphault vs. Concrete
« on: November 17, 2006 - 10:50:29 AM »
Is it better to do burnouts on asphault, concrete, or is there no difference?




Offline GoodysGotaCuda

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5392
Re: Burnouts: Asphault vs. Concrete
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2006 - 11:27:58 AM »
Is it better to do burnouts on asphault, concrete, or is there no difference?

better as far as for the car? smoke? i'd think concrete would be more fun to play on.  :clueless: never tried it.  :naughty:
Build Page: Goody's 'Cuda Build Page
1976 Dodge Warlock
1972 Barracuda - 5.7 Hemi + T56 Magnum

Wheel & Tire Specs:Link

Offline SirChandlr

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 97
Re: Burnouts: Asphault vs. Concrete
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2006 - 02:44:49 PM »
I have a 20'x20' concrete pad for working on cars that i use
It doesn't get ripped to shreads like asphalt does
and the black rubber marks look way cooler against the white :thumbsup:

Offline zerfetzen

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 393
  • 'Cuda, should'a, would'a...you lost.
Re: Burnouts: Asphault vs. Concrete
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2006 - 06:26:53 PM »
That's what I thought, pro-concrete.  Like Goody suggests, which is easier on the tires?  My guess is concrete.

Offline SirChandlr

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 97
Re: Burnouts: Asphault vs. Concrete
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2006 - 09:23:16 PM »
if you're doing a burnout, the idea is to fry your tires. If you just want to spin them and not make any smoke, use some water. Otherwise, they're both rough on tires, difference being negligable.

Offline Total BS

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 742
  • '71 Carrabuda Baby!
Re: Burnouts: Asphault vs. Concrete
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2006 - 10:49:30 PM »
Clorox Bleach on Concrete :2thumbs:
1971 'Cuda 383
1970 Chevelle SS LS6
1999 Durango
-New Joisey-

Offline GoodysGotaCuda

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5392
Re: Burnouts: Asphault vs. Concrete
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2006 - 11:38:15 PM »
That's what I thought, pro-concrete.  Like Goody suggests, which is easier on the tires?  My guess is concrete.

Easier on the tires? Burnout? can you say that in the same thread?  :lol:
Build Page: Goody's 'Cuda Build Page
1976 Dodge Warlock
1972 Barracuda - 5.7 Hemi + T56 Magnum

Wheel & Tire Specs:Link

Offline Moparal

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 13085
Re: Burnouts: Asphault vs. Concrete
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2006 - 11:47:40 PM »
If yer talkin about for racing, the track usually has compound down. The burn out box most of the time is concrete. As the first hundred ft or so.  I usually spin for about 4 or 5 seconds and roll out in third gear. The tires should be sticky by then. Then I stage at half stall or around 1800/2200 since I have a heavy car right now and jam it on the 3rd yellow.  My 2600 lb 72 cuda I launch on the transbrake at 5500 rpms. But I have 17x33 tires on it so it hooks good and leaves hard..1.18 60'  If you do a long burn out, yer just wasting tires

Offline 422STROKER

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5386
  • Member Since 6/3/06
Re: Burnouts: Asphault vs. Concrete
« Reply #8 on: November 19, 2006 - 08:03:38 AM »
I have left divits in Asphalt doing a brake stand, I don't think concrete would give as easy.  My guess is hot top is easier on your tires(it's pretty soft)



Tom :burnout:
Tom
12.77 @ 108.87 15" Street Drag radial tires 3.23 gear