Author Topic: Dyno Disaster  (Read 1295 times)

Offline RDF

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1840
  • The pain that greets me is the stick that beats me
Dyno Disaster
« on: January 20, 2007 - 06:46:37 PM »
I took my car to the shop today to get Dyno'd and left feeling ugly.  My 'Cuda has a 74 360 in it that was rebuilt about 4 years ago (not by me), so I wanted to see what it would do as far as HP goes.  I was thinking in the neighborhood of 280-300ish, boy was I wrong.   Are you ready for this?  A mind numbing 230hp and 270ft. lbs of torque at 5000rpm, that's it!  :22yikes:  :swear:   :stomp:  :banghead:  :banghead:  :banghead:  How could it pull such a small amount of hp?  :dunno: 

Just gives me reason to start my 440 build-up sooner that expected.  :naughty:
Bob

1973 'Cuda

If we never drown we'll never know how well it tastes....So tell me how it tastes and I'll know just how well you drowned.

My build:
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=45749.0




Offline VTMopar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1056
  • '70 Challenger Convertible, '74 Challenger Rallye,
Re: Dyno Disaster
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2007 - 06:53:43 PM »
Hmmmm     That is very dissapointing.   I have a '74 Challenger with original 360 and just had it gone through.   When we get it back all back together will have it on the dyno -- so not sure what it will be either.  Unfortunately, I didn't have it done before -- so won't be able to compare.   I believe they were originally rated at 245.... 

Vermont MOPAR
VT MOPAR

Offline SilverChally

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1105
Re: Dyno Disaster
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2007 - 07:02:11 PM »
Guessing its an auto which takes away around 20%, so yor probally close to 280 number at the flywheel.
70 challenger project
68 satellite

Offline inot2old

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1820
Re: Dyno Disaster
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2007 - 07:47:49 PM »
Bob, I was always curious about that,  I thought it would be closer to 300 also.
'71 Cuda 

'70 Charger project
'05 Crossfire Roadster

Offline Jacksboys

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5540
  • Here Since 08/28/06 GEORGIA
Re: Dyno Disaster
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2007 - 11:00:11 PM »
Look at it this way, it does not matter what it wil do on the dyno, but what it will do on the track.
1971 Dodge Challenger:  360/904/3.23
   
Success is the maximum utilization of the ability that you have. - Zig Ziglar

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Dyno Disaster
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2007 - 12:26:12 AM »
dynos virtually alwys leave you humbled , it i sia great tuning & comparison tool to see if you are winning or losing with the mods & upgrades you make & it can always find 20 hp tuning but the actual #s are generally low

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline 422STROKER

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5386
  • Member Since 6/3/06
Re: Dyno Disaster
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2007 - 10:09:52 AM »
230hp at the wheels isn't that bad.  Hows it feel?  If you don't race it, enjoy it.

Tom
Tom
12.77 @ 108.87 15" Street Drag radial tires 3.23 gear

Offline JS27N0B

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4809
  • Member since Jan 28th 2003.
Re: Dyno Disaster
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2007 - 10:59:57 AM »
I don't think I would be too ashamed of those numbers. As stated above they were rated at 245hp when new at the crank. Figure in the 20% parasitic loss through the driveline and I'd say your looking better than stock.
1970 Challenger R/T Convertible 383/auto 1 of 516 *now sold after owning for 18yrs
2007 Chrysler Aspen Limited AWD
2013 Tige' RZR 343hp
2016 PCP Challenger SRT Hellcat


Offline Mr. 440SixPack

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 167
Re: Dyno Disaster
« Reply #8 on: January 21, 2007 - 11:09:23 AM »
Sorry but 230hp and 270ft at 5000rpm is a lot for me :worshippy The most powerful car in my town has about 150 hp :roflsmiley:
« Last Edit: January 21, 2007 - 11:11:03 AM by Mr. 440SixPack »
My dream: 1970 Plymouth 'Cuda 440+6 Pack/4 speed Pistol Grip/Dana 60 rearend/PS, PB/Lime Light/Shaker hood/Rallye dash...


Offline CUDA JAS

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2292
  • vroooooom!
Re: Dyno Disaster
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2007 - 10:26:43 AM »
what are the specs of the moter?

Cam, intake, carb etc.

May be you can tune it for better power?

Liker was said above, if you are not racing it, that what does it matter, as long as you can  :burnout:!! :bigsmile:
74 'cuda 360/727



Gearhead: car nut, automotive enthusiast, one who loves hot rods, muscle cars, hot trucks, burnin' rubber and neck snapping performance. 

Just call me a gearhead!

Offline Super Blue 72

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 12711
  • "Big 'n Little" Member since 8/9/05
    • Phil's Super Blue '72
Re: Dyno Disaster
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2007 - 11:01:49 AM »
dynos virtually alwys leave you humbled , it i sia great tuning & comparison tool to see if you are winning or losing with the mods & upgrades you make & it can always find 20 hp tuning but the actual #s are generally low

That reminds me when I went to Factory Five Racing in Wareham, MA, for thier kit car Cobra open house and they hand a dyno there to test out cars.  Keep in mind that these are cars that do sub 5 second 0-60, 1/4 mile in 13 seconds with a stock 5.0 Ford engine.  One of them had only 175hp at the wheels but it was still a fast car because the car was so light.

But still, that's probably more than what I have in my Challenger.....  :walkaway:


Wait a minute, so....if there's 240hp at the engine, what will it have at the wheels with an automatic?  192hp?  :clueless:
1972 Dodge Challenger Rallye 340, AT, Code TB3=Super Blue, SBD=8/17/1971.  Yes, a Rallye without the fender louvers from the factory because of the body side molding option.

Pic #2 and 3 of my ARII 1/24 scale model car 

Phil in New England-Massachusetts  Always thank God for what you have!

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/456046/1972-dodge-challenger

Offline RDF

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1840
  • The pain that greets me is the stick that beats me
Re: Dyno Disaster
« Reply #11 on: January 22, 2007 - 12:30:14 PM »
230hp at the wheels isn't that bad.  Hows it feel?  If you don't race it, enjoy it.

Tom

It feels great, very powerful from 0-60.

what are the specs of the moter?

Cam, intake, carb etc.

May be you can tune it for better power?

Liker was said above, if you are not racing it, that what does it matter, as long as you can  :burnout:!! :bigsmile:

It's a 360 and from the paperwork that I found, it looks to be bored .30 over with a mild cam in it(no specs on the cam, but you can hear it when it runs).  Edelbrock Performer Intake and Edelbrock 600cfm carb.  I think the carb needs tuning though, it runs a little rich (you can smell it while idleing for a period of time).  Other than that, I don't know too much about the motor b/c I didn't do it.

I guess it's been that long for me (being into cars and motors) that I was expecting more that I got (as far as HP is concerned).  But as everyone else has said, it's prob. pushing close to 300 at the flywheel so it's pretty good for a muscle car not trying to be raced.  :2thumbs:
Bob

1973 'Cuda

If we never drown we'll never know how well it tastes....So tell me how it tastes and I'll know just how well you drowned.

My build:
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=45749.0

Offline SilverChally

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1105
Re: Dyno Disaster
« Reply #12 on: January 22, 2007 - 04:15:25 PM »
If you want more power, do some head work.... thats where you'll get the 300 you want.  Theres guys deep in the 11s with j heads.
70 challenger project
68 satellite

Offline TrakHor

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 108
Re: Dyno Disaster
« Reply #13 on: January 22, 2007 - 06:56:54 PM »
For what it's worth I had a Dakota R/T and when stock before any mods dynoed at 200 hp at the wheels. It was factory rated at 255.  Here's some factors to further compare by. That was a loss of ~21%, but the automatic overdrive it know to kill a little power.  So you probably dont have a auto over drive, but you could have a weak trans or torque converter these can all affect the rear output number. Did you do a tune up before going cap rotor and wires can account for some as well as plugs? If you get a wide band o2 sensor from some place like inovative you can tune your carb in and get it right before going back. Still you are real close to 300 hp at the crank.
The innovative piece isn't complicated to use, it's just a wideband 02 sensor. You can put a bung in each bank and move it from side to side to get each bank in tune, assuming you have dual exhaust. A 94 and up Volvo 850/S70 oil pan drain plug will work to plug the opposing bank. If you don't want to drop the money som vacuum gauge tuning could probably help the rich condition. As another member replied, the dyno can be a humbling experience, but there are a lot of little things that can be done to improve the tune on the car, then go back. If you put a hundred dollars into a tune up and a little effort on tuning you might see 245 at the wheels. 245 is close to 250, and a good % greater than what you started with.

Just my .02, good luck

Offline GoodysGotaCuda

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5392
Re: Dyno Disaster
« Reply #14 on: January 22, 2007 - 08:19:02 PM »
For comparison, my 318 was 240rwhp/270 ft/lb at 6000ft density altitude on a STD dyno with a 130,000mile tired 904 turning the tires at 144mph with the 2.76s lol, anda out of the box eddie carb. Does your chart say SAE or STD in one of the corners (or anywhere on there). STD is current conditions, SAE is corrected to sealevel. (mine corrected was 285rwhp if i remember right)




here is the chart, 6000ft conditions  :eek4:
« Last Edit: January 22, 2007 - 08:24:51 PM by GoodysGotACUDA »
Build Page: Goody's 'Cuda Build Page
1976 Dodge Warlock
1972 Barracuda - 5.7 Hemi + T56 Magnum

Wheel & Tire Specs:Link