Author Topic: Is there any reason, that an E-body wouldn't be a good handling car?  (Read 13278 times)

Offline Killer_Mopar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1886
while super-stock Mopar front and rear springs drop the car an inch.  
 It was a single four-barrel, 340 R/T


Why did you boldface that? My 70 318 Deputy Challenger Hemi R/T T/A SE has front leaf springs in it. You must have one of those "cheap" challengers with shocks and torsion bars :rofl:

You gotta love when Chevy/Ford mostly magazines start talking Mopar :icon16:
70 Challenger R/T SE - The never-ending project........




Offline Blackcuda

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 978
I really could never understand why e and b body cars steering feels so sloppy compaired to a GM car from the same era. I heard the torsion bar front suspension is part of the problem, but the power steering is just so overly assisted to the point of being dangerous IMO.  I can fully understand why people switch over to manual steering. I think a faster ratio steering box would make a huge differance, big sway bars, poly bushings, and stiffer shocks also. And the biggest improvement is modern low profile tires.

Offline Sukhoi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
  • Mr. 3-d
I've always fopund the power steering to be very light

I do enjoy being able to turn corners just by "throwing" the steering wheel to one side

Offline chrisII

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 255
 ive spent over half of my life (i started at 15 and am now 32) making old B and E body mopars handle better, but it was all left turns. i found that a heavyer sway bar, heavyer torshon bars, and a bit of extra caster will help these cars a ton in the front.  one way to help the caster a bunch is to remove the spacer from the front strut rod bushing and shorten it 1/8 inch. i dont believe in poly bushings on the strut rods either as they create bind (new rubber isnt a bad idea tho) poly bushings on the upper and lower ca are great additions and pretty affordable.

   in the rear soft flat springs help a ton! the heavy SS springs alot of people run do not allow the car to dig in except in straight line launches. MP circle track springs work well on street and road race type cars also, but also "d arch" quickly. many challys and cudas came with rear sway bars, but they were puny, i believe that diplomat squad cars came with a heavyer one (mesure it) im guessing it could be made to fit. I also think the diplomat squad had a bit tighter stering box, that will bolt right into these cars (i think the pitman is bent differently but believe it is the same length) I know i ran one in my 69 super bee circle track car.

     the last race car i had is a chally, but on a race chassis with a camaro stub and mopar leafs and i honestly think it would be a faster more stable car with the mopar front end. i never cared for driving it and could not get comfortable in it. back in the day the guys who switched to mopar from chebby could not believe how much more driveable the cars were. altho most had aspen , dart , or duster bodys they were basicly a chally or 'cuda chassis depending on wheel base (108 to 111) so yes they can be made to handle quite respectably. also if you really want it to handle dont drop a 440 in it. 400hp+ small blocks are no big deal today so why hang all that weight up front?

Offline 4Cruizn

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Expert
  • *****
  • Posts: 18521
  • HEMI FISH
Some good information there Chris . . .Thanks!   :bananasmi

Offline Super Blue 72

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 12711
  • "Big 'n Little" Member since 8/9/05
    • Phil's Super Blue '72
Very good stuff Chris!
1972 Dodge Challenger Rallye 340, AT, Code TB3=Super Blue, SBD=8/17/1971.  Yes, a Rallye without the fender louvers from the factory because of the body side molding option.

Pic #2 and 3 of my ARII 1/24 scale model car 

Phil in New England-Massachusetts  Always thank God for what you have!

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/456046/1972-dodge-challenger

Offline Bullitt-

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 12167
  • Better Things To Come Member Since 2/16/06

  Chris, Do you have any SHOCK recomendations?
Wade  73 Rallye 340..'77 Millennium Falcon...13 R/T Classic   Huntsville, AL
Screwed by Photobucket!

Offline heminut

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2023
  • owner of the poor man's Hemi Cuda
  one way to help the caster a bunch is to remove the spacer from the front strut rod bushing and shorten it 1/8 inch.

Slick tip there! I had never thought of that before, but I can see where it will certainly work! :thumbsup:
1970 5.7 Hemi Cuda

Offline ntstlgl1970

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2204
  • T a c o c a t
Kinda funny I read this now, I was just at a friends shop talking to them about this exact thing. He was saying that the geometry on the stock torsion bar setup is actually pretty good, but the problem is when people lower the car it screws everything up (bump steer, camber curve etc.). I took a look at a k member they are working on for a vintage racer AAR, they replaced the strut rod bushings with a spherical bearing, the lower control arm bushings with maybe a delrin bushing (super smooth action and no binding) and dropped spindles. I don't know what the dropped spindles are off of and I wish I would have taken pictures of it, but it looked pretty good. Hopefully they will have some sort of "kit" in the future, I'd definitely be on board. When they ran the stock mopar suspension through their computer simulation program, he said the geometry was actually a little better than the camaros of the same period.
70 Cuda, 7.0L Gen-III Hemi, Viper T56 w/9310 gearset, 3.91's, Megasquirt MS3x v3.57, Innovate wideband, Firm Feel upper arms, torsion bars, springs and strut rods, QA1 DA shocks. I did everything on this car except the fancy paint stuff and I drive it...and I can't seem to stop messing with it....

Offline Blackcuda

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 978
Re: Is there any reason, that an E-body wouldn't be a good handling car?
« Reply #24 on: June 05, 2006 - 03:17:51 PM »
Great info Chris, I once thought of buying a late model 97-04 Corvette C5 chassis and mounting a 70 Cuda body to it. Of course the drivetrain would be all Mopar, but the car would drive and handle incredible.
I think there was an e-body at last years Sema show that had a C5 vette chassis.

Offline HP2

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4478
Re: Is there any reason, that an E-body wouldn't be a good handling car?
« Reply #25 on: March 10, 2007 - 10:31:39 AM »
Well, this topic has been dead for quite a while, but hey, I just found it.

To answer the original post, no, there is nothing wrong or inferior with the design of the E body suspension system. It is, as other already responded, actually a very good design. What is usually the biggest trip ups for people comparing their vintage mopar to a modern car is limited to only a few of things; spring rates, alignment setting, and road feedback. improving these three things can usually provide huge dividends on the perception of handling. Also don't forget that these are 30+ year old cars. A lot of perception can be changed by simply firming up the chassis. Sub frame connectors or torque boxes should be the first thing anyone should do if they intend on doing anything more than driving to the local show and shine.

First and foremost are wheels and tires. Modern radials with light weight wheels provide big increases in gripping power. 15s are fine, but 17 inch wheels have the bigest selection of tire choices for performance driving and are popular enough that they can be found with 40, 45, and 50 aspect ratios to keep your muscle car from looking like a honda. You just have to look at the SUV tires instead of car tires.

Springs rates are typically 15-25% higher in a modern car than they were 35 years ago. For street applications, I really like the .96 bars for small blocks and 1.0 for big block cars. In the rear use the stock style XHD spring pack which is around 140# rate. Sway bars should be at least 1" front although 1.125 is better. Firm Feel offers a 1.25 if you really want to tame corners. Match this with a .875 or 1" rear bar and your cornering flat. To companion with the springs, get as good a shock as your willing to spend for. Edelbrock IAS are a good starting point, but bilstein, carrera, or koni are the best choices. Parts store units and KYB just aren't up to controlling these increased spring rates in a comfortable way.

Most alignment shops, even if they know how to work on a mopar, will likely use the vintage 1970 specs which were designed for skinny, bias ply tires. Radials can take a much larger range of alignment changes, which will provide HUGE changes in feel and is where a lot of the modern difference lies. Before you take your car to the shop, make sure you have the wheels and tires you want on it, engine and trans in, etc. and set the ride height where you want it first. If you riase or lower your car after alignment, your settings over every other spec will be off so do this first. Once that is done, tell the shop to leave it as it sits and ask for these settings; Caster, as much as you can get. Usually 4 degrees is the most you'll find without getting into parts replacements, but if you can get 5 or 6, take it. Camber, -1/2 to -1 1/2 degrees.  The more you actually are driving the car in corners, the higher you would want this value to be. -1/2 is probably fine for you if your just tooling around. Radials can use this -1/2 without showing significant wear differences and hte change in handling is large. Toe should be set to 0 and no more than 1/16 in. Again, if you actually use your car for road course you may want to go with 1/16 toe out, but on the street this makes things feel very "darty" so you don't necessarily want that.

The stock mopar steering has always been over-assisted. The only way to solve this is to replace the steering box with a firm feel unit or a manual box. The increase in road feel provided by these allows you to know how you car is responding much easier. There are also the fast ratio pitman and idlers which are nice, but at high speeds,100+, are actually too fast. Cup cars and land speed racers typically use a much slower steering rate than street cars.

These are all relatively easy, bolt on type changes. Obviosuly if you really want to get serious you need to look at increases in chassis stiffening, changes to poly or delrin bushings, bump steer corrections and more. Something not mentioned above that takes considerable work but also pays big dividends is gusseting the stock steering box mount. Next time you car is idling in the driveway, have a friend jump in your car and turn the wheel. You'll be amazed how much the steering box moves around in there.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2007 - 09:42:21 AM by HP2 »

Offline Volvolution

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 55
  • mmmm.... fried rice....
Re: Is there any reason, that an E-body wouldn't be a good handling car?
« Reply #26 on: March 10, 2007 - 11:18:01 PM »
sweet........ I just found this today also, and have been wanting to improve the handling on my car a bit too. They do have quite a bit of potential, especially being 30+yrs. old like everyone has been saying. and I don't have a lick of anything to add to this cuz yall said just about everything. so........ ya.   :clapping:   applause I guess?
oh....... too many cars. not enuff money... not enough time....

{oo/======\oo}

Offline chevyconvert

  • HvacMan
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1693
  • Member since November 04, 2005
Re: Is there any reason, that an E-body wouldn't be a good handling car?
« Reply #27 on: April 01, 2007 - 10:40:15 PM »
hp2..can you tell me if swapping out my old '70 manual steering box will remove most of the steering wheel play or is there other factors?
Also, does the drivers side exhaust manifold have to come off to swap the steering box? (440 cu.in.)
Eric
'70 Hemi Orange RT/SE 440 Six Pack Pistol-Grip 4 speed
Bay Area California

Offline HP2

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4478
Re: Is there any reason, that an E-body wouldn't be a good handling car?
« Reply #28 on: April 02, 2007 - 04:44:39 AM »
Use, not age, is the big factor on steering box wear. If you car acumulated 80, 90, 150 thousand miles on it, yes, your box is probably worn.  There is a method to adjusting the free play in them. I beleive I saw a thread about that on the site recently. There also is the coupler pot that attaches the shaft to the box that wears as well. There are two shoes and a pin in this coupler that wear. These rebuild kits are available form Dodge still pn 4443436AC. If you've adjusted it and replaced the coupler shoes and it is still sloppy, then yes, replacing it with a new unit will make a big difference in the slop. Flaming River makes a bolt in replacement for the manual box that has gotten good reviews on a few sites I visit.

If you've got manifolds and a manual box, you might not need to drop the manifold or head pipe, but I don't have first hand experience with a manual box on an E body. Once you get the bolts out and the pitman seperated, it should just drop straight down. 

Offline chevyconvert

  • HvacMan
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1693
  • Member since November 04, 2005
Re: Is there any reason, that an E-body wouldn't be a good handling car?
« Reply #29 on: April 02, 2007 - 04:36:07 PM »
 :2thumbs:
Eric
'70 Hemi Orange RT/SE 440 Six Pack Pistol-Grip 4 speed
Bay Area California