News:

  • Home
  • Help
  • Chat
  • Login
  • Register

    • « previous next »
    Pages: [1]

    Author Topic: Cudas' are better  (Read 1262 times)

    Offline inot2old

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1820
    Cudas' are better
    « on: March 26, 2009 - 03:32:49 PM »
    This shows what happens when a Cuda meets Challenger.  lol
    Logged
    '71 Cuda 

    '70 Charger project
    '05 Crossfire Roadster


    Offline dutch

    • Sr. Resident
    • ******
    • Posts: 6944
    Re: Cudas' are better
    « Reply #1 on: March 26, 2009 - 03:40:19 PM »
     :bigsmile: :bigsmile: :bigsmile: :aarg:
    Logged
    *** Bart ***

    Offline 67vertman

    • Sr. Resident
    • ******
    • Posts: 5125
    • Member since 9-23-2005
    Re: Cudas' are better
    « Reply #2 on: March 26, 2009 - 08:43:34 PM »
    Those may be fighting words around here........ :bigsmile:

     :smilielol:  :smilielol:
    « Last Edit: April 07, 2009 - 08:54:11 PM by 67vertman »
    Logged



    Ron - Born and raised in Southern California

    I got the 1970 Cuda, but still need the hot blonde to ride shotgun!

    First car -1969 Road Runner 383 4sp

    Current ride - 1970 Barracuda 440-6 4 sp Dana 60  (4:10)

    Offline hooD

    • detroit iron
    • Resident
    • *****
    • Posts: 2820
    • Motor City Made Muscle
    Re: Cudas' are better
    « Reply #3 on: April 07, 2009 - 03:12:13 AM »
     :woo:
    Logged
    -Larry
    member since AUG 2007
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvrWiLgDm7Y
    southeastern michigan usa
                 
     
                
    1973 'CUDA 340
     
    original owner
    37,117 miles
      
    :grinyes: *click my E-Body* :grinyes:

    Offline MJS73

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1522
      • Mike's 1973 Challenger
    Re: Cudas' are better
    « Reply #4 on: April 09, 2009 - 04:02:25 PM »
    Dodge had to make the Challenger bigger than the Barracuda to hold all its goodness.

    Mike
    Logged
    www.mikes73.com
    Don't PM me - send me an e-mail at mjsavage2001@yahoo.com

    Offline Super Blue 72

    • Permanent Resident
    • *******
    • Posts: 12711
    • "Big 'n Little" Member since 8/9/05
      • Phil's Super Blue '72
    Re: Cudas' are better
    « Reply #5 on: April 09, 2009 - 06:13:14 PM »
    Cute commercial!  :lol:
    Logged
    1972 Dodge Challenger Rallye 340, AT, Code TB3=Super Blue, SBD=8/17/1971.  Yes, a Rallye without the fender louvers from the factory because of the body side molding option.

    Pic #2 and 3 of my ARII 1/24 scale model car 

    Phil in New England-Massachusetts  Always thank God for what you have!

    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/456046/1972-dodge-challenger

    Offline sloop

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 243
    Re: Cudas' are better
    « Reply #6 on: April 09, 2009 - 06:15:28 PM »
    You Cuda guys always come up a couple inches short.... explains the complex
    Logged

    Alaskan_TA

    • Guest
    Re: Cudas' are better
    « Reply #7 on: April 09, 2009 - 10:18:40 PM »
     :smilielol:

    Good one Sloop.

    Cuda VINs start with BS too, we all KNOW what that stands for.  ;)
    Logged

    Offline 67vertman

    • Sr. Resident
    • ******
    • Posts: 5125
    • Member since 9-23-2005
    Re: Cudas' are better
    « Reply #8 on: April 10, 2009 - 01:28:07 AM »
    It's not the lenght of your toy......it how you use it that counts!  :2thumbs:

    And, Cuda owners know how to use their toy...... :poopoke:  :stirpot:

     :smilielol:  :smilielol:  :smilielol:
    Logged



    Ron - Born and raised in Southern California

    I got the 1970 Cuda, but still need the hot blonde to ride shotgun!

    First car -1969 Road Runner 383 4sp

    Current ride - 1970 Barracuda 440-6 4 sp Dana 60  (4:10)

    Offline hooD

    • detroit iron
    • Resident
    • *****
    • Posts: 2820
    • Motor City Made Muscle
    Re: Cudas' are better
    « Reply #9 on: April 10, 2009 - 02:10:05 AM »
    Quote from: 67vertman on April 10, 2009 - 01:28:07 AM
    It's not the lenght of your toy......it how you use it that counts!  :2thumbs:

    And, Cuda owners know how to use their toy...... :poopoke:  :stirpot:

     :smilielol:  :smilielol:  :smilielol:

     :iagree:  :iagree:  :iagree:  :iagree: :iagree: :iagree: :iagree: :iagree:
    Logged
    -Larry
    member since AUG 2007
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvrWiLgDm7Y
    southeastern michigan usa
                 
     
                
    1973 'CUDA 340
     
    original owner
    37,117 miles
      
    :grinyes: *click my E-Body* :grinyes:

    Offline dutch

    • Sr. Resident
    • ******
    • Posts: 6944
    Re: Cudas' are better
    « Reply #10 on: April 10, 2009 - 03:56:40 AM »
     :eek7:   here we go again....  :roflsmiley:
    Logged
    *** Bart ***

    Offline Street_Challenged73

    • Sr. Resident
    • ******
    • Posts: 8826
    • '73 FC-7 Challenger..Member since October 20, 2002
      • My '73 Challenger Restoration Page
    Re: Cudas' are better
    « Reply #11 on: April 10, 2009 - 04:38:30 AM »
    Haha, Sloop's response was great! :rofl: ...And so the debate continues... :popcorn:
    Logged
    1973 Dodge Challenger......................The ongoing project. (00/----\00)
    1991 Dodge Stealth R/T Twin-Turbo....The sunny day cruiser (RTBoost)
    1990 Toyota Celica GT Liftback...........The new daily & winter driver.
    All-American Muscle: 'Cudas and Challengers...Still the Elite and always will be.

                                                                                                 
                     
    Street_Challenged73 from Wisconsin

    Offline sloop

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 243
    Re: Cudas' are better
    « Reply #12 on: April 10, 2009 - 07:27:41 AM »
    It is so cute how you Cuda guys believe "size dosn't matter"

    Ask any honest woman... 2 inches is a "BIG" difference!
    Logged
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »