Author Topic: 496 inch RB Six Pack Dyno results  (Read 8003 times)

Offline jbc426

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 14
496 inch RB Six Pack Dyno results
« on: May 16, 2007 - 12:57:49 AM »
I just received the dyno results from an engine I had Hughes Engines build using one of Brandon's 440Source custom stroker kits with the balance of the parts, components and know-how coming from Hughes Engines.

The basic build; 4.15 superlight 440Source crank, Ross custom lightened and coated 30-over zero deck height pistons, Gapless rings, 440Source premium 7.100 rods & coated clevite bearings, Hughes Prepped RB block & Indy Ez heads(non-Max wedge port)with stage 2 Hughes porting and prep, titanium retainers, Hughes Hydraulic roller cam and valve train, Edlbrock aluminum six pack mainifold with Hughes deep porting, Promax rebuilt Holley mechanical carbs with choke horn milled, Promax billet metering blocks and some skillful carb tuning by Hughes.

This motor is not going in my daily driver, consequently I figure I'll be lucky to burn 30 gallons a month through it. I didn't want to run it on the straight 91 octane pump gas we have here in California, and planned on feeding it a mixture of 91 pump and race gas(for off road use only of course). I figure it comes out to about $1 more a day to run the high compression, and I love the snappy acceleration and sound it gives a motor.

Here are the results. It twists over 600 foot pounds of torque above 3000 rpm, peaking at 684.5 lbs/feet of torque at 4600 rpm and 681.1 horsepower at 5500 rpm

Once I finish installing it in my old 1970 4-speed 'Cuda, it should be a handful on the street. I don't think I'll make it past a first run or two at the strip because of the lack of a roll cage.




Offline jbc426

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: 496 inch RB Six Pack Dyno results
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2007 - 12:59:15 AM »
They base lined it with the Victor and a 950 and even threw a 1050 Dominator on there for intrest sake. The Victor & 950 pulled 679 ft/lbs and 676 hp. The Victor and a 1050 Dominator pulled 693 ft/lbs & 677 hp.

If I were to bolt a stock Edlebrock manifold and vacuumn secondary holleys on there or even the new Six shooter from Barry Grant. I'm sure the numbers would be at or below the 600 hp mark.

Offline Autophile

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 339
  • Kowalski... and the keys to a sawed-off weekend!
Re: 496 inch RB Six Pack Dyno results
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2007 - 01:25:32 AM »
Wow, those are healthy numbers. Congratulations on a nice set up!
1971 Cuda, black/black, 419 cu. in. 3G Hemi with twin turbos (build in progress), AlterKtion, Wilwood 12.19" disks, billet Rallye wheels

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: 496 inch RB Six Pack Dyno results
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2007 - 05:19:48 AM »
NIce  :2thumbs:

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline ragtopdodge

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4065
Re: 496 inch RB Six Pack Dyno results
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2007 - 08:37:04 AM »
Sweet numbers. :2thumbs:

What did final compression ratio calculate at?

What hyd. lifters are you using?  Comp Cams?  Crane?

Cam specs?

'70 318-auto Chally 'vert
'71 383-auto 'Cuda 'vert (sold)
06 300c SRT8
04 2500 QCLB 4x4 HO

nivvy

  • Guest
Re: 496 inch RB Six Pack Dyno results
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2007 - 12:38:42 PM »
What is the lift of the cam etc... did you get flow numbers on the heads??? also what compression???

Those numbers seem pretty high for a non max wedge ported head??? I cant believe it made 680HP ???

I am shopping around and people are telling me I need Max Wedge ported to get numbers about 700HP...Interesting
« Last Edit: May 16, 2007 - 12:41:12 PM by StrOkEr »

Offline jbc426

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: 496 inch RB Six Pack Dyno results
« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2007 - 02:17:42 PM »
I don't have the cam or flow specs yet, but the compression is around 12.6 to 1 = zero deck hieght with 75cc chambers. It's taking full advantage of the Wedge quench set-up. With Aluminum heads and coated pistons, according to the Fuel Tech at Rockett Racing fuel, it is going to need 96 R=M/2 octane - a number that can be easily obtained using about 1/4 leaded racing fuel 3/4 pump gas  The thing that amazes me, is that it's making 681 horsepower at only 5500 rpm with over 500 horsepower at 3000 rpm. The torque curve is brutal from idle on up.

As far as the modifications on the sixpack, Hughes did some deep porting on a new Edlebrock aluminum sixpack manifold, and Promax milled off the choke horn from the center carb, added some billet parts and did some other minor work to the carbs. Nothing fancy, just good common sense fuel and air flow improvements.

« Last Edit: May 16, 2007 - 02:24:14 PM by jbc426 »

nivvy

  • Guest
Re: 496 inch RB Six Pack Dyno results
« Reply #7 on: May 16, 2007 - 04:51:11 PM »
That 1.5 xtra points in compression must really make a difference....I only wanna run 11.1 at most.......Street Car!

Offline moper

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2368
Re: 496 inch RB Six Pack Dyno results
« Reply #8 on: May 17, 2007 - 06:06:28 AM »
What is the lift of the cam etc... did you get flow numbers on the heads??? also what compression???

Those numbers seem pretty high for a non max wedge ported head??? I cant believe it made 680HP ???

I am shopping around and people are telling me I need Max Wedge ported to get numbers about 700HP...Interesting


 :iagree:

Very stout numbers. Too stout IMO..details more details!!

Offline jbc426

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: 496 inch RB Six Pack Dyno results
« Reply #9 on: May 22, 2007 - 12:22:25 PM »
Here is a dyno printout I got.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2007 - 12:23:56 PM by jbc426 »

Offline RyanTurboTypeR

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 45
Re: 496 inch RB Six Pack Dyno results
« Reply #10 on: April 25, 2010 - 07:59:24 PM »
was this at the wheels or crackshaft?