Author Topic: Head Porting  (Read 2955 times)

Offline mojavered

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 853
  • Someday!
Head Porting
« on: May 08, 2011 - 11:44:52 PM »
When it comes to porting aluminum heads, how much more beneficial is it to have then CNC'd than have them hand ported?  The heads in question are EZ heads.  The motor is ran on the street and just wondering how much better the results would be having them done by Indy instead of by hand?  Thanks.
Jason




Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Head Porting
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2011 - 01:49:22 AM »
I have no direct comparison , a bad port job can ruin a set of heads & have them flow less than unported heads , I have seen it happen . A good job should get very similar results

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline mojavered

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 853
  • Someday!
Re: Head Porting
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2011 - 12:02:41 AM »
Thanks CP
I have the Indy EZ heads with the 270 cc intake port volume.  I was thinking about getting them ported out to hopefully a 290-295 window and flowing around 350-355 cfm.  That is what is offered by Indy in their "Little EZ" heads.  Has anyone had their EZ heads ported by someone other than Indy?  My heads currently flow 278 cfm @ .600".  Just wondering what I might be able to expect.  Thanks.
Jason

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: Head Porting
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2011 - 09:44:14 AM »
cnc porting provides a consistent, economical avenue to porting.  A good hand porter will take a set of cnc heads and make them better, but, it will cost you.  Or he will take a set of stock heads and make them better, but, it will cost even more and take longer.   Emphasis on the word good.

Offline mopar12372

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1163
    • mopartech
Re: Head Porting
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2011 - 02:08:58 AM »
IMOP  why would you port them ? do you have a stroker ? what size cam ?  ect
MOPARTECH.NET ( come over and visit some time )
RESTO PICTURES
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=71096.30

Offline Road_Runner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1825
  • Mopar Owner & Standard Bearer Since 1974
Re: Head Porting
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2011 - 10:02:28 AM »
IMOP  why would you port them ? do you have a stroker ? what size cam ?  ect

That's been a question of mine as well.  At what point does a set of good aftermarket heads such as the Indy, Edelbrock or Stealth BB heads or RHS SB heads need porting.  I'm looking at all these for my two Mopars and wonder if off-the-shelf is OK, or am I leaving horsepower on the table if I don't port them?...

Later, Jim
1970 383 Roadrunner Tor Red
1973 318 Barracuda Mist Green
2014 Mustang GT/CS Convertible All Black

Offline mopar12372

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1163
    • mopartech
Re: Head Porting
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2011 - 06:45:12 PM »
my point ,  clean up the casting flash?  the heads flow pretty damn good out of the box and besides the fact youll loose power if the ports are too big anyway . maybe check the valve guides and valvae job and bolt them on and go. :2thumbs:
MOPARTECH.NET ( come over and visit some time )
RESTO PICTURES
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=71096.30

Offline Jesus H Chrysler

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 698
Re: Head Porting
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2011 - 07:36:04 AM »
 :iagree:

I took my Edelbrocks out of the box and I think (personally) they looked horrible!  The casting flash inside the ports was about 1/8 inch deep in some places!  :scared:  Looks to me that it will cause lots of turbulence through the port.  I'm not "porting" them per se, just smoothing out the rough casting.  I'm wondering however if removing the casting will put me in the position Chryco mentioned about having them flow worse.
Yes I own a 1972 Dodge Challenger Convertible T/A S/E with a 440 Six Pak. Can it get any more wrong?

{OO /===\ OO}
(OO==> <==OO)



Greg, in the middle of MA has:
1970 Dodge Coronet 440 "Zom Bee"
1972 Dodge Challenger convertible 440 5 speed.
1973 Dodge Challenger 318 "Brown Bomber"
2012 Dodge Challenger R/T Classic Blackberry Pearl.
2001 Jeep Wrangler locked, lifted and lighted.  "Jeep is a registered trademark of Chrysler Corporation"

Offline 72cudamaan

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3248
Re: Head Porting
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2011 - 09:02:53 AM »
Changing the port configuration could possibly disrupt the flow
pattern, but cleaning up the casting flashing will be fine. Think of ot this way.
The ports were designed and tested without the flashing, so you're just
putting the flow back to spec's.
If I cant fix it, it's broke
 
Andy  (phukker whither)

Offline Aussie Challenger

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3407
  • In Kansas loaded for Drive to West Coast.
Re: Head Porting
« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2011 - 09:17:42 AM »
Eddy heads are getting a reputation for poor quality control, ports not lining up properly, casting flashing etc.   :hyper:
I hear from most who have dismantled them and checked them before fitting say they are glad they did so the problems could be fixed first instead of having to remove and refit a second time. It seems to defeat the purpose of buying new heads if you need to overhaul them first, or at least the eddys anyway.   :2cents:
Dave

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Head Porting
« Reply #10 on: May 22, 2011 - 11:49:48 PM »
I agree , removing lumps & flashing will always help flow with poorly cast heads , the critical point is floor , you can kill flow messing with flow

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t