Author Topic: T/A AAR question  (Read 1672 times)

Offline 06Daytona

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1099
T/A AAR question
« on: April 02, 2013 - 01:21:58 PM »
Why didn't Mopar put 303's in the production AAR and T/As? I know it was a de-tuned 340, but Ferd has the Boss 302 and Cheby has the Z/28 and I think AMC even has a 303 so why didn't Ma Mopar?
1972 Cuda 340 4 barrel 4 speed that looks like a 71
2006 Dodge Charger R/T Daytona
2005 Dodge Ram 2500 Diesel 4X4
2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible (Kidmobile)
1972 Dodge Charger 318 auto
1970 Challenger 440/727 auto
1973 Plymouth Duster 340/auto (Making it Panther Pink for the wife)
2006 Honda Civic Hybrid (It doesn't save gas, it just diverts it to the Cuda/Challenger)
In desperate need of more property for my growing Mopar family




Offline moparman82

  • MOPAR or No car
  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2834
  • Livin' the dream
Re: T/A AAR question
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2013 - 01:43:06 PM »
If I'm not mistaken it wasn't a de-tuned 340, it was a de-stroked 340 that got its cubes down below the 305 ci limit, not sure why that motor didn't go in production cars, has to w a reason tho
Scott in Omaha
Searching for the right 70 Cuda driver
1973 challenger in go-mango, on it's way to a 70 T/A clone SOLD
2015 crew cab Hemi ram SOLD
2019 Ram Laramie
2016 Tahoe LTZ SOLD
1976 Ramcharger 383 4spd SOLD
2016 Audi

24 mopars past and 2 present

Offline 69ChargerRT

  • Administrator
  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2622
  • Its the car, right? Chicks love the car. - Batman
    • Daisy - My 1969 Dodge Charger R/T
Re: T/A AAR question
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2013 - 01:46:57 PM »
If I'm not mistaken it wasn't a de-tuned 340, it was a de-stroked 340 that got its cubes down below the 305 ci limit, not sure why that motor didn't go in production cars, has to w a reason tho

why have a 305 when you can have a 340 maybe?

Offline RzeroB

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1496
  • In The Lou and looking for a new (old) ride
Re: T/A AAR question
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2013 - 04:00:49 PM »
As with most things I would imagine it had to do with the bottom line - money. I would bet that for the actual race cars, the components (crank, rods and pistons) to destroke the motor down to 305 cubes were probably outsourced to somebody outside the company. For the production cars Chrysler would have had to create new tooling to create the necessary parts and that would cost money. There were no cube limits on selling the cars to the public, so they probably figured why spend the money if they didn't have to? They had already spent enough on the block, heads and induction system (In fact I'm surprised they actually put the special block and heads in the production cars. Thought that they would have just slapped the induction system on a standard 340) and probably didn't want to spend more to destroke the engine for the street? The extra cost would have ate into their profit margin or caused them to raise their price point above what they thought they could sell enough of the cars for. That's my guess
 :stirpot:
« Last Edit: April 02, 2013 - 04:02:21 PM by RzeroB »
Cheers!
Tom
St Louis, MO

Former owner of 16 classic Mopars. "It is better to have owned (Mopars) and lost then to have never owned at all" (apologies to Alfred Lord Tennyson)

Offline AARuFAST

  • AARuFAST
  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2154
Re: T/A AAR question
« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2013 - 08:27:54 PM »
Like R 0 8 mentioned, cost.
They actually put the special block and heads with beefed up mains.
They may have had insight that owners would want to modify the engine.
1970 AAR Cuda
1970 Gran Coupe Ragtop. 1 of 66
Gran Cpe Convertible 1 yr only.

" I Want to Ride "

" I tried to be normal once...
it was the most boring
2 minutes of my life!!!!"

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: T/A AAR question
« Reply #5 on: April 02, 2013 - 11:04:48 PM »
As I recal Keith Black handled the stroker / de -stroker kits for the T/A race cars

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline MizzouRT

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 540
Re: T/A AAR question
« Reply #6 on: April 02, 2013 - 11:44:06 PM »
I'd guess Chrysler was required by SCCA rules to put the special T/A blocks and heads into the cars to get those pieces cleared for actual racing.    SCCA rules were a mess and constantly changing, but hard to imagine Chrysler going to the extra effort and expense of putting the one-off T/A parts in the production cars unless that absolutely had to.
Daily Driver: 2013 Challenger SRT 6 speed
Toy: 1970 Challenger