Author Topic: subrau wrx sti vs. mopar e-bodys (Read 10034 times)

mopar is king · « **Reply #60 on:** April 06, 2005 - 04:45:17 PM »

A STOCK DODGE CHALLENGER (440+6/426 HEMI) WITH 2.76:1 REAR END GEAR RATIO, IN STOCK TRIM CAN DO 171 MPH AND A 383 WITH THE SAME WOULD DO ABOUT 155 MPH. THAT BEATS OUT THE WRX STI 145 MPH.
1970 440+6 CHALLENGER WITH 2.76:1 = 171 MPH THAT A FASTER TOP SPEED THAN THE NSX,SUPRA,AND THE SKY LINE. JAPANES CARS SUCK!

Fleet 500 · « **Reply #61 on:** April 06, 2005 - 05:29:31 PM »

Quote from: Ghost on April 05, 2005 - 03:43:07 AM

....Pretty much the same thing someone was saying when they bought a brand new Roadrunner in 1968? :outtahere:

But the '68 Road Runner was a real car!

Ghost · « **Reply #62 on:** April 07, 2005 - 12:19:43 AM »

Quote from: Fleet 500 on April 06, 2005 - 05:29:31 PM

But the '68 Road Runner was a real car!

And, to alot of kids today, Rice is the cool car. And, it's semi performance, at an affordable price.

Fleet 500 · « **Reply #63 on:** April 07, 2005 - 01:23:54 AM »

Quote from: Ghost on April 07, 2005 - 12:19:43 AM

And, to alot of kids today, Rice is the cool car.� And, it's semi performance, at an affordable price.

But we, being wiser, not they're not (cool). Anything but! They are plastic, funny-looking blob cars of which I'm sick of seeing all over the place.

Author Topic: subrau wrx sti vs. mopar e-bodys (Read 10034 times)

mopar is king

Re: subrau wrx sti vs. mopar e-bodys

Fleet 500

Re: subrau wrx sti vs. mopar e-bodys

Ghost

Re: subrau wrx sti vs. mopar e-bodys

Fleet 500

Re: subrau wrx sti vs. mopar e-bodys