Author Topic: Let's have an exhausting discussion  (Read 5847 times)

Offline 74 challenge

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1247
Re: Let's have an exhausting discussion
« Reply #15 on: November 11, 2014 - 09:54:26 AM »
What don't you like about the 3" system?

Too large for a 318, loss of power. Would have done a 2.5.
1-8-4-3-6-5-7-2




Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Let's have an exhausting discussion
« Reply #16 on: November 13, 2014 - 10:51:11 AM »
Neil

I am guessing that "high RPM race build" means > 7k rpms eh?

B
Yes

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Let's have an exhausting discussion
« Reply #17 on: November 13, 2014 - 10:53:35 AM »
The Term Back pressure is thrown around a lot , but is wrong , you really do not want back pressure but you do need & want velocity , if the system is too big the exhaust will lose speed inside the system this will hurt the scavenging / vacuum to draw out the next exhaust pulse , on a small block 2 .25 is often better , 2.5 for the big block

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline Racer57

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1489
Re: Let's have an exhausting discussion
« Reply #18 on: November 13, 2014 - 09:57:43 PM »
The Term Back pressure is thrown around a lot , but is wrong , you really do not want back pressure but you do need & want velocity , if the system is too big the exhaust will lose speed inside the system this will hurt the scavenging / vacuum to draw out the next exhaust pulse , on a small block 2 .25 is often better , 2.5 for the big block

Its so refreshing to see that other people understand the difference.  :cheers:

But, as much as I understand the purpose of collectors and equal length head pipes and even anti-reversion cones commonly used on 2-1 headers, could you please explain (if you know) why none of that applies to NHRA Top Fuel ?  Is it a matter of just too much volume and any thing else would restrict it ?

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: Let's have an exhausting discussion
« Reply #19 on: November 13, 2014 - 11:22:14 PM »
Forced aspiration pushes the exhaust out so no scavenging is needed... Main thing is no back pressure to work against the blower.

Offline Racer57

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1489
Re: Let's have an exhausting discussion
« Reply #20 on: November 14, 2014 - 01:37:09 PM »
Forced aspiration pushes the exhaust out so no scavenging is needed... Main thing is no back pressure to work against the blower.

DUH ! :banghead:

Offline 73restomod

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 528
Re: Let's have an exhausting discussion
« Reply #21 on: December 07, 2014 - 09:51:03 PM »
I picked my mufflers based of a thorough chassis dyno comparison in (yipes) a fast fords article. I will see if I can get a link here shortly.

http://www.mustangandfords.com/parts/m5lp-0212-ford-mustang-muffler-comparison-test/

yeah it's done on fords, but it's a thorough article, and if you take the time to read the dyno chart the Borla Pro-XS's really shinned through out the RPM's.
« Last Edit: December 07, 2014 - 10:02:53 PM by 73restomod »

Offline HP_Cuda

  • Hit the skinny little pedal on the right!
  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5268
  • Mopar or No Car!
Re: Let's have an exhausting discussion
« Reply #22 on: December 08, 2014 - 02:57:29 AM »

Wow I'm impressed with Magnaflows ability to stay up with the top numbers and stay quieter at 2k and WOT.

Have to look into those!

B
1970 Cuda Clone 440 4 speed - sublime green
1970 Cuda 383 4 speed - yellow - SOLD