Author Topic: Compression Ratio Question.......  (Read 3464 times)

Offline Oldschool

  • Administrator
  • Permanent Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 13195
  • Member Since 9-05-06
Compression Ratio Question.......
« on: December 24, 2014 - 11:14:40 AM »
Hypothetically speaking, let's say you have a 500CI engine that makes 500 HP with 10.5-1 compression. Using that same engine and assuming everything else remains the same, how much would the HP change if you took the compression ratio up to 11.5-1? Also, would the torque change much? I have a buddy running a 496 in a Charger and he is looking at options over the winter. Fuel is not an issue as he will buy higher octane fuel if needed. Thanks fellas.....
Ken  --  In Georgia

MOPAR-------"Built To Run------Here To Stay"




Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: Compression Ratio Question.......
« Reply #1 on: December 24, 2014 - 11:22:28 AM »
 I'll guess 25 hp
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline Oldschool

  • Administrator
  • Permanent Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 13195
  • Member Since 9-05-06
Re: Compression Ratio Question.......
« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2014 - 11:24:04 AM »
I'll guess 25 hp

That's kind of what I was thinking. Torque guesstimate?
Ken  --  In Georgia

MOPAR-------"Built To Run------Here To Stay"

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: Compression Ratio Question.......
« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2014 - 11:29:10 AM »
That's kind of what I was thinking. Torque guesstimate?


not sure about torque.  But with a longer duration cam, and higher CR, hp gain would be quite a bit more.
I know the old wedge engines were advertised to be 20 hp more when going from
11.5 to 13.5 CR.

found this:

http://bgsoflex.com/crchange.html
« Last Edit: December 24, 2014 - 11:34:58 AM by cudabob496 »
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: Compression Ratio Question.......
« Reply #4 on: December 25, 2014 - 01:32:48 AM »
I've read that in the old days, before there were all these high tech cams, they
made more power by increasing CR.  But now, CR its not that big of a deal, when
they can match a performance cam to your existing CR.
« Last Edit: December 25, 2014 - 03:43:49 AM by cudabob496 »
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: Compression Ratio Question.......
« Reply #5 on: December 25, 2014 - 11:39:30 AM »
Peak hp will increase about 2.2%.....say 11 hp.  You can find a table without much searching.

Torque improvement will depend upon the cam duration so it could be a bit more percentage size,

There are a lot of low compression engines..say around 8-1 that make very high peak hp at high rpm with good heads and a big cam.  They usually need a much higher stall converter to get moving, tho.


Power increase is a sliding scale so that the gain from 8 to 9-1 is a larger percentage than 12-13-1 would be.  Also, the increases shown in the table are for iron heads.  Aluminum heads, being less thermally efficient with regard to combustion, will gain slightly more going from 10 to 11-1 than would iron heads.  We are talking about a fraction of a percentage point given that all other things are equal other than head material.
« Last Edit: December 25, 2014 - 11:46:09 AM by Strawdawg »

Offline HP_Cuda

  • Hit the skinny little pedal on the right!
  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5268
  • Mopar or No Car!
Re: Compression Ratio Question.......
« Reply #6 on: December 25, 2014 - 03:26:55 PM »

Way too many variables but in large part depends on the cam, cooling but jumping one point might get you 20hp.

Heck you could outdo that with a better exhaust system.
1970 Cuda Clone 440 4 speed - sublime green
1970 Cuda 383 4 speed - yellow - SOLD

Offline moper

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2368
Re: Compression Ratio Question.......
« Reply #7 on: December 26, 2014 - 07:33:52 PM »
I think it's more of a "when" as oposed to "how much".more compression will bring the torque rpm peak down, and flatten the curve. It will add a little, but not that much. You'd get more from changing mufflers. but it will feel more snappy.

Offline Racer57

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1489
Re: Compression Ratio Question.......
« Reply #8 on: December 26, 2014 - 09:56:35 PM »
Compression comparisons don't mean squat unless both engines have the exact same camshaft.

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: Compression Ratio Question.......
« Reply #9 on: December 26, 2014 - 10:24:22 PM »
The initial question assumed everything else was the same.
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: Compression Ratio Question.......
« Reply #10 on: December 26, 2014 - 11:12:24 PM »
Hypothetically speaking, let's say you have a 500CI engine that makes 500 HP with 10.5-1 compression. Using that same engine and assuming everything else remains the same, how much would the HP change if you took the compression ratio up to 11.5-1? Also, would the torque change much? I have a buddy running a 496 in a Charger and he is looking at options over the winter. Fuel is not an issue as he will buy higher octane fuel if needed. Thanks fellas.....


It always helps to read the original question....  :)

Or read Bob's post above....:D
« Last Edit: December 26, 2014 - 11:16:58 PM by Strawdawg »

Offline Racer57

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1489
Re: Compression Ratio Question.......
« Reply #11 on: December 27, 2014 - 08:45:00 AM »
I was only commenting for those that may not know about camshafts effecting compression.

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: Compression Ratio Question.......
« Reply #12 on: December 27, 2014 - 07:04:14 PM »
no problemo
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000