If the Hellcat Challenger or Charger do not thrill you

[KZ]

then maybe a Hellcat Jeep Cherokee is more your style?

http://myclassicgarage.com/social/posts/101488-jeep-grand-cherokee-hellcat-trailhawk-confirmed?wv_email=zachmank@mail.nih.gov&utm_source=Email&utm_medium=WeeklyEmail&utm_campaign=15email

[4406v]

I drove a 2012 SRT Grand Cherokee during my SRT Track Experience day. I under estimated how much I would like the SRT Grand Cherokee can't imagine the Hellcat version wouldn't be FREAKIN AWESOME!!!

[KZ]

I haven't had the pleasure of driving any SRT OR Hellcat, but I would be worried in a Hellcat powered Cherokee, with its higher profile, that it would easier to flip

[4406v]

During the track experience we drove a Charger, the Challenger, the 300, and then the Grand Cherokee. In that exact order the vehicles just got better. The Charger felt a lot rougher and handled o.k., The Challenger was just a little better, The 300 of the cars was smoother, handled better than the other 2, The Grand Cherokee was just better than the rest. I'm telling you "By the seat of the pants" It was just the best one of all 4. Even during the road race course they just plain stuck to the road and hauled a$$!!!

Chrysler has it all wrong. If they want to sell more cars and more SRT products they should let people go to the "SRT Track Experience" BEFORE you buy one. Pay the $700 (Yes $700) for the day and now that you've driven all 4 models you can make a better choice. I would have bought the 300 or the Grand Cherokee NOT the Challenger I already had!!! If you buy an SRT model they should take the $700 off the price. I'll bet they'd sell a lot more and people would be happier with their purchases.