Author Topic: QA1 K-member  (Read 686 times)

Offline dodj

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6197
QA1 K-member
« on: November 14, 2015 - 08:19:52 AM »
Recently been looking over the QA1 k-member. Looks kinda flimsy actually. Has there been any third party testing or even opinions as to whether it is more rigid? I like the idea of more open space under there, but not at the cost of strength?
Scott
1973 Challenger  440 4 spd 
2007.5 3500 6.7 Cummins Diesel, Anarchy tuned.
Good friends don't let friends do stupid things. ........alone.




Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: QA1 K-member
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2015 - 08:33:39 AM »
Recently been looking over the QA1 k-member. Looks kinda flimsy actually. Has there been any third party testing or even opinions as to whether it is more rigid? I like the idea of more open space under there, but not at the cost of strength?

 :iagree: Not for me, compared to a stock k-frame not much weight savings either IMO?
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0