1966 charger 500

Author Topic: 1966 charger 500  (Read 4156 times)

Offline JS27N0B

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4809
  • Member since Jan 28th 2003.
Re: 1966 charger 500
« Reply #30 on: June 05, 2005 - 09:06:16 PM »
6pak,

I agree with you wholeheartedly, I got your back buddy.  I have never(well maybe) seen such a pile of :bs:

I can't believe you guys are buying it because of a piece of paper. I suppose everyone here believes that there were Daytonas made for the 70 model year as well.

There are classes at the Mopar Nats besides stock original, could have won a modified trophy BTW.
 6pak, just relax and let these guys do the reasearch and they will then know you were right.
1970 Challenger R/T Convertible 383/auto 1 of 516 *now sold after owning for 18yrs
2007 Chrysler Aspen Limited AWD
2013 Tige' RZR 343hp
2016 PCP Challenger SRT Hellcat





Offline The Cuda Guy

  • Support Our Troops
  • Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 3899
  • Pearl Harbor, HI
    • C-C.com
Re: 1966 charger 500
« Reply #31 on: June 05, 2005 - 09:14:28 PM »
   your right i didnt read that "paper" on the history of nacsar!! because i already know my history of cars i dont need to reed some mocked up print of someone opinions of how winged cars came about becouse i know the facts!!! maybe you should learn some history before you start knockin on someone woh know a nuts load load more then you!! congratulation youve sucssfully pissed me off!!

Ok wise guy dont go flexing your "nuts" here and with me, this isnt the place 1. and 2. your proved my point for me.  

I said:  "I dont think he read the paper."  

and you said: "your right i didnt read that "paper" "  

So I was right in my opinion, and I dont see how that pissed you off.  But if you would like to make any more of this I might be at Carlisle, and we can figure your problem out there?   :boxer:

Cuda Guy
« Last Edit: June 05, 2005 - 09:25:50 PM by The Cuda Guy »
The Cuda Guy Project is on going!

Member Since January 14, 2002

Offline Andrew

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2521
Re: 1966 charger 500
« Reply #32 on: June 05, 2005 - 10:04:31 PM »
there were 3 daytonas made for the '70 model year
their vin's state that they were r/t's and offically thy were r/t's
but they came with the daytona option package
http://www.wwnboa.org/70csed.htm

Offline Mr. 6pak2go

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2266
  • Restore it dont crush it!
Re: 1966 charger 500
« Reply #33 on: June 06, 2005 - 08:37:15 AM »
Ok wise guy dont go flexing your "nuts" here and with me, this isnt the place 1. and 2. your proved my point for me.  

I said:  "I dont think he read the paper."  

and you said: "your right i didnt read that "paper" "  

So I was right in my opinion, and I dont see how that pissed you off.  But if you would like to make any more of this I might be at Carlisle, and we can figure your problem out there?   :boxer:

Cuda Guy     
OK number one i apologize for losing my cool !! the reason you pissed me off is because you "in so many words" said i was  stupid and didnt know anything about history of cars!!! or thats the way i took it anyways!! so im sorry i got mad!! Im sorry to andrew also because andrew "didnt even do anything wrong" and he is the one who got the heat" SO SORRY ANDREW!! AND SORRY CUDA GUY!!  :spank: :spank:   :spank:  Oh yea cuda guy im not gonna fight you at carlisle 1 youll kick my ass 2 thell kick me out!!  :thumbs:  have a nice day!
My family, My cars, My guns three things il fight for!!

Offline Mr. 6pak2go

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2266
  • Restore it dont crush it!
Re: 1966 charger 500
« Reply #34 on: June 06, 2005 - 08:48:17 AM »
that last message was all screwy it was supoosed to say youll kick my butt and they will kick me out!! beside violince is not the way to settle a verbal dispute!!!  i made my peace  i got mad i apologized for it!!    :beer:
My family, My cars, My guns three things il fight for!!

Offline 4drbrnko

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 532
Re: 1966 charger 500
« Reply #35 on: June 06, 2005 - 09:40:54 AM »
Wow, 0-flame in 1.5 pages.  :laughing: :laughing:
Can ya feel the luv?
The most imprtant thing you can learn in life is almost anythings possible.
It's also kinda hard knowing for sure one way or the other about an issue/car that was built 30-40 years ago.
I do know there is a lead time on new car models that would place this charger right in the "window of oportunity(sp)" as a proto.  :dontknow:
*insert popcorn smilie here*
<-------<<<  Clickylinks..... My vehicles

Offline The Cuda Guy

  • Support Our Troops
  • Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 3899
  • Pearl Harbor, HI
    • C-C.com
Re: 1966 charger 500
« Reply #36 on: June 06, 2005 - 05:12:46 PM »
No problem, things got out of hand, these things happen here from time to time.

Cuda Guy
The Cuda Guy Project is on going!

Member Since January 14, 2002

Offline Mr. 6pak2go

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2266
  • Restore it dont crush it!
Re: 1966 charger 500
« Reply #37 on: June 06, 2005 - 07:11:25 PM »
cool!  :thumbs:  :beer:  :wasted:
My family, My cars, My guns three things il fight for!!

Offline JS27N0B

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4809
  • Member since Jan 28th 2003.
Re: 1966 charger 500
« Reply #38 on: June 06, 2005 - 09:22:25 PM »
there were 3 daytonas made for the '70 model year
their vin's state that they were r/t's and offically thy were r/t's
but they came with the daytona option package
http://www.wwnboa.org/70csed.htm


This was all proven as bogus in the pages of MCG this last year.
1970 Challenger R/T Convertible 383/auto 1 of 516 *now sold after owning for 18yrs
2007 Chrysler Aspen Limited AWD
2013 Tige' RZR 343hp
2016 PCP Challenger SRT Hellcat


Offline The Cuda Guy

  • Support Our Troops
  • Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 3899
  • Pearl Harbor, HI
    • C-C.com
Re: 1966 charger 500
« Reply #39 on: June 06, 2005 - 09:28:46 PM »
I read that article, seemed like that old mas story was a little off!!!

Cuda Guy
The Cuda Guy Project is on going!

Member Since January 14, 2002

Offline Andrew

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2521
Re: 1966 charger 500
« Reply #40 on: June 06, 2005 - 10:48:54 PM »
hmm...
interesting :iagree: