Author Topic: Rocker Question  (Read 2002 times)

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Rocker Question
« on: January 19, 2016 - 03:34:52 AM »
If 1.5 stamped steel rockers have 150,000 miles on them, how much lower
would the 1.5 ratio be, due to wear?
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000




Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Rocker Question
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2016 - 08:25:14 AM »
nothing , as long as here is no free play , the rockers tips are probably worn though

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline dodj

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6197
Re: Rocker Question
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2016 - 10:17:54 PM »
1.49999899979
Scott
1973 Challenger  440 4 spd 
2007.5 3500 6.7 Cummins Diesel, Anarchy tuned.
Good friends don't let friends do stupid things. ........alone.

Offline vinb

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2163
Re: Rocker Question
« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2016 - 06:14:15 PM »
I used to check many  340 stock stamped rockers, ratios were 1.41 to may be 1.46  , Your push rod will  put a hole in one before the ratio changes. :smilielol:

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: Rocker Question
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2016 - 06:58:45 PM »
so the cup the pushrod is in, and the tip, wear at the same
rate, so the ratio does not change??  I'm confused.
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline jhaag

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 616
Re: Rocker Question
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2016 - 11:32:13 PM »
Rocker arm ratio is measured on a horizontal plane. The ratio is the distance from the center or pivot point to the center of the tip that contacts the valve, divided by the distance from the pivot point to the center of the pushrod cup. As an example 1.5 / 1 equals a 1.5 rocker ratio. Wear does not affect the ratio. Only moving the pivot point changes the ratio. (everything else being equal) Any wear that occurs has no affect on ratio. So explain why you think wear changes ratio...
love 70 Challengers

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: Rocker Question
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2016 - 12:41:38 AM »
Rocker arm ratio is measured on a horizontal plane. The ratio is the distance from the center or pivot point to the center of the tip that contacts the valve, divided by the distance from the pivot point to the center of the pushrod cup. As an example 1.5 / 1 equals a 1.5 rocker ratio. Wear does not affect the ratio. Only moving the pivot point changes the ratio. (everything else being equal) Any wear that occurs has no affect on ratio. So explain why you think wear changes ratio...

I will, but first can you explain this?

"Another important note is that the Rocker Ratio is always changing because the Rocker Arm tip is moving on an arc around it's center pivot point, but the valve stem goes straight up and down. This means that as the Rocker Arm moves, the distance from the pivot point to the contact point on the valve stem is always changing.  If this distance is changing, the Rocker Ratio is also changing.  Typically, the amount of change for a nominal 1.5 Rocker Ratio in a pushrod engine is from 1.45 to 1.55 as it goes through it's arc. For Over Head Cam valve trains, the change in Rocker Ratio is much more dramatic.  It is not unusual for the ratios to change from 3.0 to 1.5 during the entire valve lift event."

« Last Edit: January 22, 2016 - 04:14:36 AM by cudabob496 »
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Rocker Question
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2016 - 09:46:39 AM »
as the hydraulic lifter adjusts for play the ratio has to stay the same so if one end moves X the other end has to move Y

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: Rocker Question
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2016 - 11:53:59 PM »
The rocker moves in an arc rather than straight up and down.  Thus when you measure from a horizontal plane as mentioned above, the tip of the rocker has a slightly different length from the rotation axis when a line is projected down from the horizontal plane.  At maximum "throw", the effective length is minutely less so the rate of valve movement with rocker displacement is not linear. 

It has nothing to do with wear.  It's simply geometry at work.

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: Rocker Question
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2016 - 12:35:42 AM »
I guess I must have been thinking about "effective" rocker ratio then. Obviously per the strict definition,
it does not change, if its just a ratio of lengths.  I think my mindset was, if you increase rocker ratio, you increase
valve lift. If you decrease rocker ratio, you decrease valve lift.  So, if figured, if the tip of the rocker arm wears, due to
age, that will decrease valve lift, which also occurs if you decrease rocker ratio. But, the two are really not related, I suppose.

72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000