News:

  • Home
  • Help
  • Chat
  • Login
  • Register

    • « previous next »
    Pages: [1]

    Author Topic: OK.. which was faster on paper..?  (Read 679 times)

    Offline 71fish

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1600
    • Bless you..
      • Ken's 71fish
    OK.. which was faster on paper..?
    « on: June 30, 2005 - 12:07:45 PM »
    Can be either E-body.

    A stock 383 (cuda or chally) vs the 340 ((cuda or chally) Single 4 brl. Pretty stock engines. Same gear ratio.. 355's or 3.91's, auto's
    Is there any Mopar road tests for these.. standing 1/4 etc..?

    71fish
    Logged
    71fish - Nobody better than an E-BODY!!


    Offline 1973challenger360

    • Resident
    • *****
    • Posts: 2385
    Re: OK.. which was faster on paper..?
    « Reply #1 on: June 30, 2005 - 07:58:14 PM »
    low 14's 
    Logged
    1965 barracuda. Was 273/2 904 car had 440 360 in plans
    1996 Dodge 1500 ST 5.2 Np3500 4x2 club cab short bed

    2008 Veracruz AWD Limited     I pay she drives
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »