Engine block date vs car build date

Author Topic: Engine block date vs car build date  (Read 1276 times)

Offline scf100

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 795
  • FAST LANE FOREVER!
Engine block date vs car build date
« on: February 01, 2006 - 08:30:24 AM »
The  engine in my 1970 Challenger RT/SE is not the orig so I am toying with the idea of finding a date code correct block / heads....so how far out should casting dates on heads/block be vs cars build date?

PS my build date is Sept 1969. Orig motor 383 Magnum

PSS anyone got an extra?


thanks,
1970 Challenger R/T convertible 383…. 4-speed…3.91 suregrip

Triple Black




Offline moparnut

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2410
  • Nutin like a nice Piece of Hickory"Clint Eastwood
    • My Photo's
Re: Engine block date vs car build date
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2006 - 09:28:30 AM »
Why spend that kind of money on another engine when its non numbers anyway?To me i wouldnt give a rip once the original is gone it doesnt matter what the date code is,put a hemi in it.I can think of tons of other things to spend that money on.Just my 2 cents worth
70 Barracuda Gran Coupe,383-4bbl,# Match
2012 Subaru Forester
70 D100 Adventurer 383 pickup
02 F250 S'cab Powerstroke 7.3 4x4 6 speed Manual
06 Honda VTX1800S Spec 3

cudahob

  • Guest
Re: Engine block date vs car build date
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2006 - 09:53:45 AM »
In the future, it would be harder and harder to find a date code block that is also a decent engine.

Mine engine was build 3-5-70; car was built 6-18-70, so maybe 4 or 6 months.

I got another 340 with a date code of 1-7-70 that will run the car.

kudakidd

  • Guest
Re: Engine block date vs car build date
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2006 - 10:29:30 AM »
Why spend that kind of money on another engine when its non numbers anyway?To me i wouldnt give a rip once the original is gone it doesnt matter what the date code is,put a hemi in it.I can think of tons of other things to spend that money on.Just my 2 cents worth

 :iagree: The nut is absolutely correct.

Offline moparnut

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2410
  • Nutin like a nice Piece of Hickory"Clint Eastwood
    • My Photo's
Re: Engine block date vs car build date
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2006 - 11:22:42 AM »
I dont know who originally started this "date code" thing way back when.To me who cares if the original is gone?It will never be a numbers car again unless you find the original so why bother?Last year I sold my 68 charger r/t.4 speed dana track pack car,original engine was gone and most people didnt care and nobody asked if it was correct date code.I guess i just dont see the logic behind it.But to each his own,I'll get off my pedestool now,lol
70 Barracuda Gran Coupe,383-4bbl,# Match
2012 Subaru Forester
70 D100 Adventurer 383 pickup
02 F250 S'cab Powerstroke 7.3 4x4 6 speed Manual
06 Honda VTX1800S Spec 3

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Engine block date vs car build date
« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2006 - 11:34:38 AM »
anyhting 3-4 months ahead of the car build date is typical 6 months prior wuld be max generally

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline pink panther

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2547
Re: Engine block date vs car build date
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2006 - 03:39:26 PM »
the onlything date coded motor gives a person is the ability to forge numbers matching.  really date coded doesn't matter.
Scott   -  Member since 9/18/2005

Offline wart1de

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 300
    • Vivah
Re: Engine block date vs car build date
« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2006 - 08:10:06 PM »
I reckon this would be going on quite a bit.
1973 Plymouth 'Cuda
1980 Ford Falcon XD ESP
2012 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon