Author Topic: why didn't we buy em when they were new....  (Read 4265 times)

Offline TreeFrog

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2848
  • Can Ya HEMI Now! If you can't dodge it Ram it!
    • TreeFrog
Re: why didn't we buy em when they were new....
« Reply #30 on: January 04, 2007 - 08:35:15 AM »
I was made in 70 so there ya go....
65 Satellite     361 Ruby Red Poly
72 Challenger    360 Top Banana     
73 Challenger    340 Triple Black
87 Dodge Ram     318 Blue
88 Dodge Ram     360 Grey (+)
04 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 4.7L Pewter Met.




Offline Blackcuda

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 978
Re: why didn't we buy em when they were new....
« Reply #31 on: January 04, 2007 - 08:55:38 AM »
After talking to my cousin who is old enough to remember about this same topic, he said that Mopars had a bad rap of being junk, rattle traps brand new with very bad build quality. He remembers a guy who owned a gas station near where I grew up that bought a new 70 Hemi Cuda. He said the guy would drag the car and was beat by small block Camaros, and Nova's all the time. Big block Chevells, 442's, some Ford Mustangs and Pontiac GTO's were the cars people were buying.
The guy with the Hemi Cuda blew the motor in the early seventies, and the car was parked behind the gas station for some 15 year rusting away. He says he thinks the cars motor was pulled and the car was junked.
He said if he only knew what they would be worth today, he could have bought the car for $500 in 1975.

Offline Jacksboys

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5540
  • Here Since 08/28/06 GEORGIA
Re: why didn't we buy em when they were new....
« Reply #32 on: January 04, 2007 - 10:04:48 AM »

Whats kinda funny is the 318 block in the cuda was cast 9/17/71....my bday is 9/17/87  :biggrin: :screwy:

Sounds like a good story (combined with your adventures) that could be made into a movie.  :2thumbs:
1971 Dodge Challenger:  360/904/3.23
   
Success is the maximum utilization of the ability that you have. - Zig Ziglar

Offline ChallengerGary

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3040
    • Challenger Gary
Re: why didn't we buy em when they were new....
« Reply #33 on: January 04, 2007 - 10:53:20 AM »

Whats kinda funny is the 318 block in the cuda was cast 9/17/71....my bday is 9/17/87  :biggrin: :screwy:
 

Too Fuuny - I've got a 340 block in my shop that is cast on 6-16-71, my birthday is 6-16-67.  I am always looking for a Challenger with a 616 build date and figure if I find one that's a /6, 318 or a non-numbers match 340 car, I'll build that motor for it and KEEP that car.  I found one 71 Challenger R/T 383 car that had my b-day on the fender tag but the guy was not interested in selling it  :stomp:
2006 Dodge Ram 1500 Mega Cab 5.7 Hemi

1972 Dodge Demon - "new" project

AND TOO MANY OTHER MOPARS THROUGH MY HANDS TO COUNT

Offline whitesatinmopar

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 7273
  • Member Since 3/30/02
Re: why didn't we buy em when they were new....
« Reply #34 on: January 04, 2007 - 03:25:05 PM »
 

Too Fuuny - I've got a 340 block in my shop that is cast on 6-16-71, my birthday is 6-16-67. 


That makes you exactly 7 days older than one of those boys in my previous post  :roflsmiley: My oldest son was born 6-23-67...............2 days befoe my birthday of 6-25. Y'd think a woman could at least wait two darn days, right?  :roflsmiley:   :smilielol:
1969 Polara 500 vert.
1970 Charger 500
1971 Dart Swinger
1972 R/R 440+6 (wanabe)
1973 Challenger

Offline Carlwalski

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 20672
Re: why didn't we buy em when they were new....
« Reply #35 on: January 04, 2007 - 03:26:36 PM »


I would have purchased them but I was 32 years too late.  :violin: :thumbsup:
1970 Dodge Challenger R/T
White, License Plate, 0A-5599
540ci Aluminium Hemi, F.A.S.T EFI
TF-727 Gear Vendor OD, Dana 60

Offline Moparmatt

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
  • Mopar or No Car - Member Since 10/09/03
Re: why didn't we buy em when they were new....
« Reply #36 on: January 04, 2007 - 08:46:53 PM »
Well, I wasn't born early enough (1988) to buy one off the showroom floor, nor off a used car lot, nor old enough for the first boom and bust cycle (80s-90s). By the time that I was old enough, I didn't have the money. Now that I have the money, the market has taken off, and I can't afford one.

Offline 70RTdroptop

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 608
  • 1970 Challenger R/T 440-SixPack
Re: why didn't we buy em when they were new....
« Reply #37 on: January 04, 2007 - 08:53:33 PM »
I was 11 years old in '70, and too young back then to buy one, or appreciate these cars for what they are. I remember back in '82 when  I had my first '70 Challenger RT 383 slapstik, a guy at the gas station told me that the " RT " stood for " real trouble ". Still trying to figure out if he was right or not :clueless:
1970 Dodge Challenger R/T 440-6 convertible
1966 Ford Mustang convertible  - numbers matching (wife's car )

Offline Andrew

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2521
Re: why didn't we buy em when they were new....
« Reply #38 on: January 05, 2007 - 06:40:41 AM »
Well...
In 1970, my parents were 10, living at opposite ends of the country and the nearest cuda or challenger was probably on the other side of the world.

Ha! I have a better excuse than all of you! :icon16: :smilielol:

Offline tttaziz

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: why didn't we buy em when they were new....
« Reply #39 on: January 05, 2007 - 11:00:39 AM »
I was 16 in 1970 and in a kinda dream situation.  My Dad was an executive at Chrysler, so I got to order my first car on the executive lease program.  '70 Challenger SE, 383/auto, Top Banana with black vinyl roof, black/white houndstooth seats, pretty much every option but sunroof.  I remember that you were restricted on an e-body to no larger than the 383 engine and no convertible/sunroof unless you paid a premium rate (which Dad wasn't going to do for me).  During the summer, we cruised Woodward at least once a week.  Gas was 19.9 cents at the Total station during the occasional gas war. In '71 I had a Charger 500, but in '72 went back to e-body with a red/white 340 'Cuda ('73 and '74 did Charger SE's).  Build quality was worse on the e-bodies than the b-bodies. Do I wish I had them back?  Yes, and I'm looking for them.

Even at the time, you didn't see many Hemi cars.  They were an expensive option, tough to keep tuned, and not a real pleasant daily driver at least in the snow and cold areas.  A 440+6 was almost as fast and less tempermental.  The guys that ordered the Hemis were the more serious racers and didn't want the weight and flex of a convertible.  It's interesting that at the time my dream car was a Chrysler 300 letter car (in '76 I finally got a '57 300-C).  I remember going to the 300 meets at the time and we'd wonder if the then current cars would ever be collected or even last.  So yeah, I'm sure we'll be collecting the SRT cars in 20-30 years.

Ty

Offline BIGSHCLUNK

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 9341
  • Miss NIKKI - were you this hot at 48?
Re: why didn't we buy em when they were new....
« Reply #40 on: January 05, 2007 - 08:22:38 PM »
At the time the E's & B's were just " another tinny Dodge (or Plym as the case may be)". Although they were fast ,the build quality (squueeks/rattles)just wasnt there compared to GM's lineup.IMO. Comparitively they didn't have that solid of a "feel". The flip of the coin is the rarerity $$$ that they are today (comparitively). As for Coverts living here (Wis) .. back in those days (as some of you know) winters were real ass kickers here!! Nobody wanted a ragtop for only a few months a year. Times have changed haven't they? Keep the top down... the LINES look GREAT!
70 Chally R/T Convertible- Yes she's really got a HEMI, no she's not a Charger!
                                             [o o o o]
                                                  OO
                                                  OO 
                                              [o o o o]
https://www.aanddtruckautoparts.com/
http://www.facebook.com/pages/A-D-Truck-and-Auto-Parts/67427352555?ref=hl