Author Topic: talking about prices...  (Read 581 times)

Offline banana70

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 47
  • 70/440 and 74/318 challengers
talking about prices...
« on: January 21, 2007 - 11:27:26 PM »
I was cheking on my D&P RED BOOK learning moere about other mopars and unterstanding all this "coronet/super bee/belvedere/gtx/road runner/superbird" names for just two cars with different trims... (thank god theese days trims are named with initials and numbers)....

The truth of the matter is that I started noticing about how close the prices were those days between the full size (coronet), the mid-size? (charger) and the small/pony (challenger)... price gap between one and other was very close, i.e. '70 charger r/t was $3.711, coronet r/t was $3.569 and challenger r/t was $3.266.  :clueless:

I ask why the charger being smaller (Am i right?) was a little bit more expensive than the coronet? and also noticed that chargers up until 1970 didn't have their plymouth homologue... it was a class of its own..

Since 1969 is the year I was born, can any of you older (meaning wiser) fellas elaborate a little bit more on this matter?... 




Offline Andrew

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2521
Re: talking about prices...
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2007 - 11:58:54 PM »
The charger was a higher trim level than the coronet (as far as I can tell).
The charger was to the coronet what the GTX was to the Satellite (although there are obvious exceptions, like sport satellite and coronet R/T)

Also, I think challenger was mid size, and a-bodies were the small ones (coronets and chargers were full size, with monacos, polaras etc. Uber-size)

Il take a look at the dimensions.

Offline SilverChally

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1105
Re: talking about prices...
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2007 - 12:14:26 AM »
More material = higher price... back then they were just new cars.
70 challenger project
68 satellite

Offline Andrew

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2521
Re: talking about prices...
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2007 - 12:17:32 AM »
Here are the sizes for the various dodge models (I suspect plymouth were similar)

Charger:
Wheelbase...117"
Overall length, width, height...208.0"/76.6"/53.2"
Track; front/rear...59.5"/59.2"

Dart:
Wheelbase...111"
Track, front/rear...57.4"/55.6"
GTS, Swinger 340 track, f/r...58.1"/56.3"
Overall length...195.4"    (seems a little odd to me?)
Overall width...69.6"
Overall height (6-cylinder sedan)...54.4"

Coronet
Sedan (dont have 2-door dimensions)
Wheelbase...117"
Track, front/rear (6-cyl.)...59.5"/58.5"
Track, front/rear (V8)...59.5"/59.2"
Overall Length...206.6"
Overall width...76.7
Overall height (6-cyl)...54.5

Polara
4-door Sedan

Wheelbase...122"
Track, front/rear...62.1"/60.7"
Overall Length...220.8"
Overall width...79.3"
Overall height...56.8

Monaco 4-door Dimensions are exactly the same as polara

These are the advertised dimensions of 1969 dodge models.