Author Topic: 1970 Challenger R/T Convertible  (Read 1365 times)

Offline 74 340 4speed

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 481
1970 Challenger R/T Convertible
« on: June 16, 2007 - 09:19:31 PM »
Saw this on the yenko website and thought that you guys may be interested.

http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/274884/an/0/page/0/gonew/1#UNREAD
Andy
1967 Camaro SS: 406 sbc 505 hp/506 ft lbs|4 speed|Posi|3.73s
1969 C/10  350|Turbo 350
1969 Dodge D300 318|4 speed|Dana|4.88s
1972Nova: 350|Turbo 350
1974 'Cuda: 340|4 speed|Dana 60|4.10s|posi
1999 Camaro SS: Auto|Longtube Headers|True Duals|TT2s
2013 Challenger R/T: 6 speed|Hurst with pistol grip|mopar performance exhaust|super track pak




Offline inot2old

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1820
Re: 1970 Challenger R/T Convertible
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2007 - 10:46:20 AM »
The body doesn't look too bad, but the frame rail issue would scare me.  The price seems a little high for the condition to me, although more pics would help.
'71 Cuda 

'70 Charger project
'05 Crossfire Roadster

Offline bb71challenger

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6549
Re: 1970 Challenger R/T Convertible
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2007 - 02:19:56 PM »
Thats pretty much what I was thinking. Lot of money for a car with more steel in the body panels than in the frame  :eek4:
1971 Challenger (OO==== ====OO) getting close!
1970 Challenger (OO########OO) long ways off
*Brett*

Offline MEK-Dangerfield

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 20946
  • I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
Re: 1970 Challenger R/T Convertible
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2007 - 02:27:44 PM »
UGH!!


  I do agree with what has been said, but it is an R/T. I'll say it will go for more than 25K.   :2cents:



  Mike

Mike

1970 Challenger - SOLD
2016 SXT+.  1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.

Offline wiging19

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 601
Re: 1970 Challenger R/T Convertible
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2007 - 01:11:23 PM »
The outline looks alot like my car except mine isn't an R/T.   My car was original engine and transmission.  The key to the value of the car is does the whole drive train match?  Is the engine usable or blown?  What parts are missing on the car that should be there?  My experience is it costs alot to have a car like that.  Even if you don't keep it a numbers matching vehicle.  It would be easy to drop $40K into the car fixing it up.   The money I've put in my car in 1999 could have bought me an Iroc and the money I'm spending this year would allow me to buy a 2008 challenger. The joy of driving a car like that in good shape is beyond words.  To get it to that kind of shape few people who don't love that particular style have it in them to do (skill, money, will power, etc.). 

On the other hand a car like that will increase in value just because not everyone can have one and once they are gone you won't be able to recreate it like you would a 1969 camero or 1965 mustang.  In the end the car is worth what someone is willing to pay for.  Just making it safe to drive will increase its value significantly.

I have to agree with "MEK-Dangerfield"

Offline ragtopdodge

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4065
Re: 1970 Challenger R/T Convertible
« Reply #5 on: June 22, 2007 - 07:03:32 PM »
Frame rails are now being repro'd so not as big a deal anymore.

If you know of a good restoration shop, it'll take about $50k to restore that if you do a bit of the assembly yourself.

Then...you got $75k into an R/T 'vert.  About what they're going for restored, but at least you'll know the history.



'70 318-auto Chally 'vert
'71 383-auto 'Cuda 'vert (sold)
06 300c SRT8
04 2500 QCLB 4x4 HO