Author Topic: Compression ratio??  (Read 1035 times)

Offline bennydodge

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Compression ratio??
« on: September 09, 2008 - 07:55:46 PM »
I'm running a 416 stroker SB with zero-deck Ross flat-tops(w/ deep valve reliefs). Anyone know what the comp. ratio would be with open chamber j-heads? Currently with E-heads it's about 11.5 to 1. How much drop with the iron j(587) heads? 
1973 Dodge Rallye Challenger 340(416 stroker), 727 ,3.23 SG, 76,xxxmi.
2010 Ram 3500 CC Dually 4x4, Cummins, loaded
2015 Challenger R/T classic B5 5.7 8spd




Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Compression ratio??
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2008 - 08:11:39 PM »
to myt knowlegde the Eddy heads are close to the same volume as the J heads so no actual change BUT Alum disapates more heat than iron so the effective compression ratio @ 11.5 : 1 would be the same as 10.5 with iron heads so using the iron heads will increase the heat by approx 1 point of compression to a real 11.5 :1 

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline bennydodge

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: Compression ratio??
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2008 - 08:18:11 PM »
I didn't realize they were so close. The E-head has a 63cc closed combustion chamber and the J-head is open. I thought the open chamber would be closer to 70cc. Am I overlooking something, Chryco? 
1973 Dodge Rallye Challenger 340(416 stroker), 727 ,3.23 SG, 76,xxxmi.
2010 Ram 3500 CC Dually 4x4, Cummins, loaded
2015 Challenger R/T classic B5 5.7 8spd

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Compression ratio??
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2008 - 01:53:39 AM »
the J heads is listed at 68 cc , I thought the E heads was larger with the 340 piston clearance ?

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline bennydodge

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: Compression ratio??
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2008 - 07:40:25 PM »
My Eddy heads are not clearanced for the early 340 pistons. So how would 68-70cc affect compression vs. a 63cc chamber?
1973 Dodge Rallye Challenger 340(416 stroker), 727 ,3.23 SG, 76,xxxmi.
2010 Ram 3500 CC Dually 4x4, Cummins, loaded
2015 Challenger R/T classic B5 5.7 8spd

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Compression ratio??
« Reply #5 on: September 11, 2008 - 03:21:18 AM »
you would drop into the 11:1 range but the alum head acts as if it was 10.5:1 with the heat disapation so you would still end up with more effective compression

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline moper

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2368
Re: Compression ratio??
« Reply #6 on: September 11, 2008 - 07:05:08 AM »
Most J heads if they have been checekd fall in the 71-74cc range from that factory. Any valve jobs will increase that, and milling deacreases it. Edelbrocks are generally 63-64cc. Using the KB calculator, I get 12:! static with auminum, anad this will drop to 11.5 or so using 68ccs on the Js. I have two questions... RPMs are way better in terms of chamber design, engine setup, and ports, plus lighter... Why the "step backward" to a set of Js? You also lose any quench. What cam do you run now? Are you experiencing issues?

Offline bennydodge

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: Compression ratio??
« Reply #7 on: September 11, 2008 - 05:48:39 PM »
Looking to go back to a stock look. I know the iron heads will support 500hp when ported properly. The whole "lookin' stock and cleanin' clocks" deal appeals to me now. I don't think I can bring myself to put the stock exhaust manifolds back on, though(soooo restrictive). The cam that's in it for now is a Crane Retro-fit hyd. roller. My oil pressure issues have been well documented on here. I might just go back to solid flat tappet......
1973 Dodge Rallye Challenger 340(416 stroker), 727 ,3.23 SG, 76,xxxmi.
2010 Ram 3500 CC Dually 4x4, Cummins, loaded
2015 Challenger R/T classic B5 5.7 8spd