Home
Member Rides
Forum
Sponsor Sites
Tools
Contact
News:
Home
Help
Search
Chat
Login
Register
Cuda-Challenger.com
»
Off Topic
»
Everything Else
(Moderators:
4Cruizn
,
ChallengerHK
,
Oldschool
) »
Great design, but is it viable?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: Great design, but is it viable? (Read 504 times)
asm74
Jr. Member
Posts: 307
Great design, but is it viable?
«
on:
November 05, 2008 - 02:06:45 AM »
http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/11/the-40-mpg-450.html
Who's at SEMA? someone get more info on this!
Read the comments. Scam?
«
Last Edit: November 05, 2008 - 02:09:22 AM by asm74
»
Logged
73 Challenger
certifiablecuda
Rust Loves Me
Jr. Member
Posts: 88
Re: Great design, but is it viable?
«
Reply #1 on:
November 05, 2008 - 05:59:56 AM »
If it were true, then the civic type vehicles would really get a boost.
I mean half of them get almost 40 now, 33% on top would be in the 50-60 range... pretty sweet.
Logged
1971 `Cuda 383 Auto
2005 Dodge Ram CTD 2500
1976 Jeep CJ-5 - RED
1976 Jeep CJ-5 - ORANGE
1978 Jeep CJ-7 - SILVER
1982 Jeep CJ-8 a.k.a Daughter Scramber Project
moparmaniac59
Resident
Posts: 3772
Drive it like ya stole it!
Re: Great design, but is it viable?
«
Reply #2 on:
November 05, 2008 - 08:39:04 PM »
What a sweeeeeet looking ride!! It uses the same technology used by nuclear submarines to create oxygen for breathing. Sounds pretty viable to me!! I'd love to have one. I'll bet if it's made into a production run that it will be pretty pricy!!
Matt B.
Logged
Matt
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Cuda-Challenger.com
»
Off Topic
»
Everything Else
(Moderators:
4Cruizn
,
ChallengerHK
,
Oldschool
) »
Great design, but is it viable?