Home
Member Rides
Forum
Sponsor Sites
Tools
Contact
News:
Home
Help
Search
Chat
Login
Register
Cuda-Challenger.com
»
Chryco's Tech Shop
»
Engine & Go Fast Goodies
(Moderator:
Chryco Psycho
) »
another ballast resistor question
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: another ballast resistor question (Read 484 times)
r15303
Jr. Member
Posts: 354
another ballast resistor question
«
on:
June 16, 2009 - 02:56:51 PM »
I just replaced my ballast resistor (the original burned out) and I think I notice a difference in performance. The car seems to run rich at idle. The new resistor is 1.2 ohms. Can this cause a weaker spark and therefore affect performance. The car starts and runs but seems different. What value resistor should I use on a 440-6 1970 Challenger with electronic ignition? It is a 2 pole resistor.
Logged
Bullitt-
Permanent Resident
Posts: 12167
Better Things To Come Member Since 2/16/06
Re: another ballast resistor question
«
Reply #1 on:
June 16, 2009 - 03:00:57 PM »
I had just the opposite experience... I think 1.2-ohms is the standard
Logged
Wade 73 Rallye 340..'77 Millennium Falcon...13 R/T Classic
Huntsville, AL
Screwed by Photobucket!
MEK-Dangerfield
C-C.com Expert
Posts: 20946
I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
Re: another ballast resistor question
«
Reply #2 on:
June 16, 2009 - 05:48:43 PM »
Are you using a Mopar ignition module, or some other brand? 1.2 Ohms is fine for a Mopar ignition module, but others use slightly less resistance.
Mike
Logged
Mike
1970 Challenger - SOLD
2016 SXT+. 1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.
r15303
Jr. Member
Posts: 354
Re: another ballast resistor question
«
Reply #3 on:
June 16, 2009 - 06:23:43 PM »
thanks guys. It is a standard mOPAR MODULE SO THE 1.2 IS CORRECT.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Cuda-Challenger.com
»
Chryco's Tech Shop
»
Engine & Go Fast Goodies
(Moderator:
Chryco Psycho
) »
another ballast resistor question