Author Topic: 340 6 pak -vs- Eddy performer rpm + 750 cfm carb  (Read 1051 times)

Offline Tonefiend

  • ▬▬▬▬ ♫ ♠ ♫ ▬▬▬▬
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 987
  • '70 Challenger
    • Ian A. Guitars
340 6 pak -vs- Eddy performer rpm + 750 cfm carb
« on: June 12, 2010 - 02:58:09 AM »
I'm just thinking out loud here about my 340 build.  The 6 pack would run approx $1300 more than the Edelbrock performer RPM with a good carb in the 750 cfm range.  I am thinking it might be a worthwhile endeavor to spring for the extra bucks and get the SIX PAK. 

I wouldn't mind loosing a few ponies to get the 3 duces, but too many might be a problem.  What would be the performance difference between the 2 setups? 
« Last Edit: June 12, 2010 - 03:05:35 AM by tonefiend »




Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: 340 6 pak -vs- Eddy performer rpm + 750 cfm carb
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2010 - 03:04:18 AM »
no comparison the 6 pack will work better
better yet would be a RPM intake & a Proform or Holley HP 750 double pump

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline Tonefiend

  • ▬▬▬▬ ♫ ♠ ♫ ▬▬▬▬
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 987
  • '70 Challenger
    • Ian A. Guitars
Re: 340 6 pak -vs- Eddy performer rpm + 750 cfm carb
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2010 - 03:08:33 AM »
no comparison the 6 pack will work better
better yet would be a RPM intake & a Proform or Holley HP 750 double pump

Thanks Chryco.  I edited it to indicate a Performer RPM.  Thats the one I have had my eye on. 

I like the idea of the 6 pack. I guess it's the stories my dad told me as a kid about the T bucket with 3 deuces.   I wouldn't mind sacrificing a little hp for the 6 pack but if I am going to see really good gains from the performer rpm and good carb I might think otherwise.