Author Topic: To Stroke or not to Stroke  (Read 1656 times)

Offline punisher72

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 293
  • 70Challenger 440 4 speed yeeehaaaaa!!!!!!!
To Stroke or not to Stroke
« on: November 23, 2011 - 03:07:54 AM »
Hello again all.
Im tossing up wether to go a stroker or not?
I can buy a 440 short block with forgies steel crank,etc etc. It just needs to be bored to suit pistons,for a good price. This is standard stroke.
Then do a port job on my eddy heads and so on.
Or i could use my existing 440 and buy a stroker kit and go that way.
Im just wondering if my 23 spline 4 speed will handle around the 6 to 650 hp im looking for???
Yes its a street car but i like to go fast down the 1/4 and i want it to scream tuffness and scariness  :droolingbounce:
Now if i have to buy a new box to be able to handle that sort of power,then i will be saving for a lot longer.....
Or i could buy this other motor do it up so it can handle my abuse lose some power maybe and still keep my g box....
Id like some sort of plan here so i can say yay or nay to this short block.
Am i just confusing the matter here????
What are peoples opinions?




Offline Cooter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1207
  • There goes the lone Challenger............
    • christinecarclub.com
Re: To Stroke or not to Stroke
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2011 - 07:39:40 AM »
Ronnie Sox did it with a good 'ol A-833 4-speed. I don't see why you couldn't. However, be aware, it has no OD for freeway cruising...Brutal in strength though.
1958 plymouth Belvedere 2dr hd top "Christine" [OO)====V====(OO]
1969 dodge Charger "General Lee"         [___|______I______|___]                        
1968 Dodge Dart 2dr sedan 505" Stroker    (O]=0==========0=[O)                
1970 Challenger R/T Clone "Kowalski Special"   (OO) [___________] (OO)

Offline GranCuda1970

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5515
  • Rev 20:4. Mat 6:33 John 1:3 Mat 26:41
Re: To Stroke or not to Stroke
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2011 - 07:44:36 AM »
If it was good enough for the Boss' should be good enough for you!! :2thumbs:

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: To Stroke or not to Stroke
« Reply #3 on: November 23, 2011 - 09:07:57 AM »
I not sure what to say , a steel crank 440 is a good combo but to get 600 hp + the stroker is easier to make the extra power & about as affordable as reconditioning the factory parts so it makes sense to me to go bigger

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline GranCuda1970

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5515
  • Rev 20:4. Mat 6:33 John 1:3 Mat 26:41
Re: To Stroke or not to Stroke
« Reply #4 on: November 23, 2011 - 09:56:52 AM »
« Last Edit: November 23, 2011 - 10:06:01 AM by GranCuda1970 »

Offline punisher72

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 293
  • 70Challenger 440 4 speed yeeehaaaaa!!!!!!!
Re: To Stroke or not to Stroke
« Reply #5 on: November 24, 2011 - 12:54:06 AM »
Thanx guys  :2thumbs:
I should of asked if the box could handle 600 +hp.......
Im keen on the stroker idea  :bigsmile:
Theres this 500 stroker kit for sale here in  :aussie:
H Beam Connecting Rod w/ARP 2000 Bolts
440 Source 6760.990.2

Platinum Series Pistons - 4.350 - -4ft
440 Source 5093

Chrysler H Series Rod Bearings STD
440 Source CB-527HND

V Series Main Bearings STD RB Engine
440 Source MS-1795V

Total Seal Moly File Fit Rings - 4.350
440 Source CR6490-35

Crankshaft 440 Source 4404150676 0-6

Is this a good list of parts?
Also will my eddy RPM 84cc heads port up good to work with this combination? And id like to run a hyd roller cam......


Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: To Stroke or not to Stroke
« Reply #6 on: November 24, 2011 - 08:22:17 AM »
I prefer to run the 512 kit with 7.1" long rods over the 6.76 500" but if it is close to you that will work
 the 833 will not be the weak link

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline 440mike

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 91
Re: To Stroke or not to Stroke
« Reply #7 on: November 24, 2011 - 10:09:08 PM »
while it is true that there is no replacement for displacement, it is also true, that you can never exceed the heads, no matter how big the engine underneath.
well ported edelbrocks are good to about 500 cubic inch, thats about it, and tough to 6k rpm on a 500, even when ported.

Offline punisher72

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 293
  • 70Challenger 440 4 speed yeeehaaaaa!!!!!!!
Re: To Stroke or not to Stroke
« Reply #8 on: November 26, 2011 - 03:51:55 AM »
Ok so I'm thinking bout the 512 as chryco suggested.
Next thought is with the $ I spend on doing up my eddys could I buy a pair of bigger flowing heads for around the same price??
I don't know a lot about what heads are good or not?

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: To Stroke or not to Stroke
« Reply #9 on: November 26, 2011 - 07:48:59 AM »
to me the eddys are just an entry level head , the new Super Stealth looks interesting , Indy has a number of choices available , the EZ are more easily adapted to most builds

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t