Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?

News:

  • Home
  • Help
  • Chat
  • Login
  • Register

    • « previous next »
    Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

    Author Topic: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?  (Read 10679 times)

    Offline MEK-Dangerfield

    • C-C.com Expert
    • ********
    • Posts: 20946
    • I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
    Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
    « Reply #45 on: December 05, 2011 - 04:22:48 PM »
    Just speaking about the local scene here. 72-74 E-bodies are pretty much non-existent.   :sadwavey:
    Logged

    Mike

    1970 Challenger - SOLD
    2016 SXT+.  1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.


    Offline Challenger6pak

    • Resident
    • *****
    • Posts: 4084
    Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
    « Reply #46 on: December 05, 2011 - 06:16:07 PM »
    Wouldn't it be ironic if there ends up being less 72-74's around due to the fact they were used for parts to rebuild the less common 70 & 71's.
    Logged
    1969 Sport Satellite H code convertible, 1970 Cuda 440+6, 1970 Challenger R/T 440+6, 1970 Challenger 383 R/T auto, 1970 Challenger R/T 383 4 speed,1971 Challenger convertible.

    Offline burnt orange

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 782
    Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
    « Reply #47 on: December 05, 2011 - 06:53:32 PM »
    Quote from: kissalien on November 02, 2011 - 12:10:35 PM
    If it's not a '70 or '71 U R A LOSER.

    No really, I don't understand why people can't be happy with what they have. If you've got any year E-Body that's awesome. If someone turns up their nose at you then screw them. They probably don't have one at all, or if they do, they aren't worth your time.


    Reminds me of a story of a Mary Kay rep who had the perfect comeback to those who gave her a bad time about driving a pink Caddy.
    She simply smiled at them and said "Oh yes, and what color Cadillac did your employer buy you?"  End of story.
    Logged
    < ° ) ) >< 

    Offline HP2

    • Resident
    • *****
    • Posts: 4478
    Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
    « Reply #48 on: December 31, 2011 - 12:04:12 PM »
    One of my favorite post 71 Challengers. It was in mopar muscle a couple years ago.

    Logged

    Offline Super Blue 72

    • Permanent Resident
    • *******
    • Posts: 12711
    • "Big 'n Little" Member since 8/9/05
      • Phil's Super Blue '72
    Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
    « Reply #49 on: December 31, 2011 - 09:29:57 PM »
     :iagree:  I think I have that issue.

    This is one of my favorite semi-stock '72s... love the black with red stripes...

    Logged
    1972 Dodge Challenger Rallye 340, AT, Code TB3=Super Blue, SBD=8/17/1971.  Yes, a Rallye without the fender louvers from the factory because of the body side molding option.

    Pic #2 and 3 of my ARII 1/24 scale model car 

    Phil in New England-Massachusetts  Always thank God for what you have!

    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/456046/1972-dodge-challenger

    Offline dodj

    • Sr. Resident
    • ******
    • Posts: 6197
    Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
    « Reply #50 on: January 01, 2012 - 11:41:16 AM »
    Quote from: Challenger6pak on December 05, 2011 - 06:16:07 PM
    Wouldn't it be ironic if there ends up being less 72-74's around due to the fact they were used for parts to rebuild the less common 70 & 71's.
    The '70 and 71's are the most common. 70 in particular. So having a '72-'74 just means you have a more rare car than those run of the mill 70 & 71's  :stirpot:
    Logged
    Scott
    1973 Challenger  440 4 spd 
    2007.5 3500 6.7 Cummins Diesel, Anarchy tuned.
    Good friends don't let friends do stupid things. ........alone.

    Offline Super Blue 72

    • Permanent Resident
    • *******
    • Posts: 12711
    • "Big 'n Little" Member since 8/9/05
      • Phil's Super Blue '72
    Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
    « Reply #51 on: January 01, 2012 - 03:21:33 PM »
    Still have yet to see a '70 or '71 car turned into a '72....oh wait a minute!  :thinkerg:

    Mod Squad Challenger...



    Gone in 60 Seconds...



    Logged
    1972 Dodge Challenger Rallye 340, AT, Code TB3=Super Blue, SBD=8/17/1971.  Yes, a Rallye without the fender louvers from the factory because of the body side molding option.

    Pic #2 and 3 of my ARII 1/24 scale model car 

    Phil in New England-Massachusetts  Always thank God for what you have!

    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/456046/1972-dodge-challenger

    Offline 73Chally

    • Resident
    • *****
    • Posts: 2381
    Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
    « Reply #52 on: January 01, 2012 - 07:56:47 PM »
    I'm quite happy with my 73.
    Logged

    Offline 72bluNblu

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1836
    Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
    « Reply #53 on: January 01, 2012 - 10:25:04 PM »
    Quote from: dodj on January 01, 2012 - 11:41:16 AM
    The '70 and 71's are the most common. 70 in particular. So having a '72-'74 just means you have a more rare car than those run of the mill 70 & 71's  :stirpot:

     :iagree:

    Production #'s for Challengers:

    1970- 76,935
    1971- 26,299
    1972- 22,919
    1973- 23,930
    1974- 11,354

    So really the '74 Challenger is the most rare. More Challengers were made in 1970 than from '72-74 combined. In fact, from '71-'74 84, 502 Challengers were built, compared to the 76,935 that were built in '70. So, 1970 is by FAR the most common.

    I would guess that the Barracuda's numbers are pretty similar. Although, for the 'Cuda's I don't think it makes much of a difference, '71 is really the only year that looks significantly different... :poopoke:
    Logged

    Offline aris_unlimited

    • Project in full swing
    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 800
    Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
    « Reply #54 on: January 02, 2012 - 12:54:37 AM »
    I'm 100% okay with any e-body out there, no matter the year lol. I personally have a 72 cuda and like it just fine, in fact I am restoring it! Yep restoring (and modding) an ebody that is not a 70-71 lol. I personally like the look of the 71 cudas the best, but as far as I am concerned all ebodies look killer and I am satisfied to simply have one at all.
    Logged
    Cuda is gone :(

    74 satellite, daily driver/project now

    Offline moparmaniac59

    • Resident
    • *****
    • Posts: 3772
    • Drive it like ya stole it!
    Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
    « Reply #55 on: January 02, 2012 - 10:34:32 AM »
    I've had 4 Barracudas and 1 Challenger which I currently own. It's a '74 and at the time I bought it,  the market was at it's peak. I wanted another 70-71 "E" body, but folks were asking (and getting) as much as 5K just for a rolling shell without even a drivetrain. So I opted for a super clean one owner '74 Challenger, garage kept with a nicely built 440 which I gladly paid 12K for. I love ANY old Mopar!! Sure, some are worth more than others, but it's owning one that is fun, not what it's worth because I'll probably never sell mine nor will I be able to get the 30K I have in it. It's just the love of ownership!  :woo: On another note, I have a '68 Barracuda coupe. It's just a driver with a mildly built 360. Far from being a show car, but I love driving it and it's had a decent resto job done. I was at a local show when the lady (I use that term loosly) next to me asked about my car. She was driving a museum piece, I think an early Packard and it was a very nice car, but she was a snooty, rude snob and made a rude comment on my car to which I simply replied that it was finished and at least I could drive mine to shows, park it anywhere and it didn't require a trailer!! Touche'.... :roflsmiley: :smilielol: :roflsmiley: Mopars rule!!  :bigsmile:

                                                                                Matt B.
    Logged
    Matt

    Offline MJS73

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1522
      • Mike's 1973 Challenger
    Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
    « Reply #56 on: January 02, 2012 - 02:30:46 PM »
    I've actually heard that the '73 Challengers are very cool...
    Logged
    www.mikes73.com
    Don't PM me - send me an e-mail at mjsavage2001@yahoo.com

    Offline 71340RT

    • Resident
    • *****
    • Posts: 3502
    Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
    « Reply #57 on: January 09, 2012 - 10:38:58 PM »
    I have never let it bother me as I have owned a 73 Cuda, 2-73 Challengers of which one I still wish I owned as it was a matching numbers Rallye 340 4-speed black with white interior, rallye dash, console, AC, PS, PD brakes, light group. It needed restored and had been hit hard in the left front and had had frame rail work. It drove good and ran good but cars come and go. I have had 2-70 cuda's and 2-71 challenger RT's. I'm restoring a 73 B5 blue challenger right now and some parts are cheaper to buy on the 72-74 models. I say buy what you can afford and enjoy the crap out of them as these cars will never be built again. I drive all of mine and people think I'm crazy but life is short so don't let it slip by. 
    Logged


    70 Plymouth Cuda 340 4-speed
    71 Dodge Challenger RT 340 automatic
    1973 Dodge Challenger 360 automatic EFI
    2002 Harley Davidson Dyna Wide Glide
    2003 Dodge Stratus RT coupe
    2009 Challenger RT Classic B5 Blue
    2014 Ram Express 5.7 Hemi 4X4

    Offline dawerks

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 102
    Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
    « Reply #58 on: January 11, 2012 - 07:26:06 PM »
    I just bought a 73.  I didn't really know there was a 'preference' for the early cars, just that I have never seen a Challenger on the road, so I didn't get to be picky with the year!  Don't kick me out! :)
    Logged
    Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
    « previous next »