Author Topic: Caster  (Read 1613 times)

Offline dodj

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6197
Caster
« on: June 11, 2012 - 09:59:01 PM »
Hi all
I'm no front end geometry expert to say the least. I'm about to install the moog offset bushings. The instructions don't seem to jive with what I thought I was buying them for. ie positive caster. Just to be sure, I'm installing these to effectively move the upper ball joint towards the rear of the car...right?
Scott
1973 Challenger  440 4 spd 
2007.5 3500 6.7 Cummins Diesel, Anarchy tuned.
Good friends don't let friends do stupid things. ........alone.




Offline Bullitt-

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 12167
  • Better Things To Come Member Since 2/16/06
Re: Caster
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2012 - 12:31:06 AM »
That's the way I take it, I imagine the bushings could be used to correct other issues.
Wade  73 Rallye 340..'77 Millennium Falcon...13 R/T Classic   Huntsville, AL
Screwed by Photobucket!

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Caster
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2012 - 09:14:54 AM »
yes , the front bushing should push he arm out more so the tube through the bushing should be further away from the ball joint , reverse for the rear bushing.

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline dodj

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6197
Re: Caster
« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2012 - 11:32:13 AM »
Thanks for the replies B & CP. I think Moog just envisioned the bushings being used for camber adjustment.
Scott
1973 Challenger  440 4 spd 
2007.5 3500 6.7 Cummins Diesel, Anarchy tuned.
Good friends don't let friends do stupid things. ........alone.

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Caster
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2012 - 02:28:40 PM »
coat the eccentric bolts with Anti Seize !!

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline dodj

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6197
Re: Caster
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2012 - 03:30:59 PM »
coat the eccentric bolts with Anti Seize !!
You know, I put anti sieze on those bolts 20 years ago, which was the last time I changed the control arm bushings. That made removing the eccentric bolt/washers VERY easy. Total time (Car was already up on stands) to remove both brakes, release t-bars, remove rotors, split the uca's from the knuckle's with a p-fork and remove the cam bolts and remove the uca's, .....less than an hour. Very satisfying when everything goes smoothly.

Very good advice - anti-sieze is your friend. pushed the cam bolts out with my finger.
Scott
1973 Challenger  440 4 spd 
2007.5 3500 6.7 Cummins Diesel, Anarchy tuned.
Good friends don't let friends do stupid things. ........alone.

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Caster
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2012 - 06:26:08 PM »
 :2thumbs:

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline 72bluNblu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1836
Re: Caster
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2012 - 06:01:08 PM »
Don't install them as in the MOOG instructions!!!!

I believe this is how they should be installed to get the result that you want. The bushings were originally designed to correct for accident damaged cars that had bent shock towers, and the instructions were to get you to the STOCK alignment specs.

Install them like this to get the result that you're looking for...



Offline dodj

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6197
Re: Caster
« Reply #8 on: June 13, 2012 - 06:17:33 PM »
That's how I installed them. Thanks Blu'nBlu  :2thumbs:
Scott
1973 Challenger  440 4 spd 
2007.5 3500 6.7 Cummins Diesel, Anarchy tuned.
Good friends don't let friends do stupid things. ........alone.