Author Topic: '04 Neon VS '65 Belvedere  (Read 14628 times)

Offline jimynick

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4512
Re: '04 Neon VS '65 Belvedere
« Reply #15 on: March 18, 2014 - 08:45:48 PM »
My heart was with the Fury, but my son has a 04 PT turbo and Lordy, that thing will haul a$$ for a 2.5 or 150ci 4 banger. But, like the men said, there's no replacement for displacement and a hemi says it best- with regrets to Pillsbury.  :thumbsup:




Offline Oldschool

  • Administrator
  • Permanent Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 13195
  • Member Since 9-05-06
Re: '04 Neon VS '65 Belvedere
« Reply #16 on: March 19, 2014 - 09:09:02 AM »
The Neon dude:

Ken  --  In Georgia

MOPAR-------"Built To Run------Here To Stay"

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: '04 Neon VS '65 Belvedere
« Reply #17 on: March 19, 2014 - 09:13:23 AM »
I'm warming up to Neon's. If I had extra time/money/space I might have one to play with! :2thumbs:
Still love "oldschool" CID much better though.
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline Killer_Mopar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1886
Re: '04 Neon VS '65 Belvedere
« Reply #18 on: March 19, 2014 - 10:52:25 AM »
I'm warming up to Neon's. If I had extra time/money/space I might have one to play with! :2thumbs:
Still love "oldschool" CID much better though.

I've had (2) SRT4s, they are great cars for what they are. Run 13s stock, in a blink of an eye they run 12s, and with not much work (no internal work) 11s. There are plenty that make 500hp on stock internals - Keep in mind that it's 148 CI, so that's well over 3hp per CI. I've never seen any big block mopar come close to ratio on stock internals. My full srt4s took everything I threw at them and then some, biggest problem was traction.....
70 Challenger R/T SE - The never-ending project........

Offline moparman82

  • MOPAR or No car
  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2834
  • Livin' the dream
Re: '04 Neon VS '65 Belvedere
« Reply #19 on: March 19, 2014 - 01:02:27 PM »
That's a fun video, just to clarify, that was a belvedere vs a srt4, not a neon :). I know someone is gonna say they are the same, I'm just sayin, it doesn't say NEON anywhere on a srt4. Lol just poking at people here, I love em both, muscle cars are the coolest thing ever haha but can't complain about a 4cyl mopar runnin 12s with a few bolt ons getting 28mpg all day long
Scott in Omaha
Searching for the right 70 Cuda driver
1973 challenger in go-mango, on it's way to a 70 T/A clone SOLD
2015 crew cab Hemi ram SOLD
2019 Ram Laramie
2016 Tahoe LTZ SOLD
1976 Ramcharger 383 4spd SOLD
2016 Audi

24 mopars past and 2 present

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: '04 Neon VS '65 Belvedere
« Reply #20 on: March 19, 2014 - 01:11:32 PM »
I know a guy  that just bought an SRT neon to build up for a circle track race car in the 4cyl division. Should be a strong runner, let the whining begin! :lol:
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline cudamadd

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1070
    • cudamad157071@gmail.com
Re: '04 Neon VS '65 Belvedere
« Reply #21 on: May 02, 2014 - 02:53:33 AM »
Go old mopar go great little clip cheers  :smokin:
Go 4 a spin Ya Why Not.

Offline joe1978c

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 20
Re: '04 Neon VS '65 Belvedere
« Reply #22 on: August 22, 2014 - 04:22:19 PM »
I'm pretty sure the SRT-4 engine is completely different than the old Mistubishi engines in the Avenger.  The SRT engine is all Chrysler.  It was used in the Neon SRT-4, PT Cruiser turbo and the Caliber SRT-4.

FWD Mopars are a strainge breed.  The muscle car guys in general hate them and the import guys don't respect them either.

It's odd but now u mention it that is kinda true.  What WASN'T mentioned (maybe in threads futher down I didn't get too) in reference to the Mitsubishi and dodge/Plymouths sharing engines, is how about the old stealth R/T TT?  Had VR4 3000GT motor.  Now I AM MUCH more of a muscle car guy (68 440 GTX, 70 340 Cuda currently) but I am STILL looking for a low mile, clean example of the stealth to buy.  Twin-turbo, AWD, VERY fun, VERY EASILY modified into a VERY fast car.  A friend had one in college and I fell in love w/it.  Sorry everyone.  Still, I wouldn't mind an SRT4 Neon to mod and then just use as a gas saver/commute to work vehicle by any means.  It would probably be faster and get better gas mileage (though just not as nice/convenient/comfortable) as my current car I use for this purpose, which is an Acura 3.2 TL Type-S
-------------------------------------------------------
[OO][=l=l=l=GTX=l=l=l=][OO]
-1968 Plymouth GTX, 440,727,8.75
-------------------------------------------------------
(O|[=^====|====^=]|O)
-1970 Plymouth 'Cuda, Shaker 340/727/8.75
-------------------------------------------------------
2012 Challenger RT, 5.7/6 spd. 3.92 gears, functional OEM MP shaker, Mr Norms CUDA fenders, tune, 180 tstat ( SOLD) WELL, actually traded towards SRT8
________________________________________

2011 SRT8 Challenger... 6.4/6 spd. LOADED (seriously don't think ANY options left off), RARE Green with envy paint w twin black stripes. Only mods aware of are AirRaid CAI and mufflers already done when I got car.) 19,000 miles!!
________________________________________________
- M.P. NOS 300hp Crate Magnum 360, currently being modified to est. 475-500hp for temp use in 'Cuda (going to rebuild current 340 and change car to manual tranny, Magnum 360 then going in ? (hopefully I'll find a nice, light Dart or Duster!))