Have read most of the posts here on what the preferences are of the forum members when looking at purchasing a new clutch. Thought I had my mind made up with a McLeod B&B/Long clutch but after speaking with someone today by phone (whose name is well known by most all of you that owns a business that specializes in 4-spd transmissions and clutches), I am now undecided. His recommendation was a standard McLeod B&B pressure plate.
Let me give you my set-up and driving intentions and let you chime in with your opinion and advice:
71 Challenger
440 Magnum (HP unknown but guess around 425)
stock 906 heads
Eddy AVS 1812 carb
Dougs 2" headers
Magnaflow 2.5" X-pipe exhaust
Engle Cam - 517 lift, 235 dur @.50, 108 lobe centers
3.23 sure-grip
15x8 rear wheels with 255/60/15 BFG Rad T/A
143 flywheel - 11" clutch needed
Just finished doing a 3 yr rotisserie restoration and left in old Valeo B&B style PP with performance disc to see how it ran. Lasted only a month before starting to slip and also had a 4th gear synchronizer that needs replacing (didn't rebuild tranny during restoration hoping it was in good shape). So I've removed tranny to do a rebuild and to replace clutch.
Car will be an occasional driver (and frequently driven hard
). Maybe will go to local track for an 1/8 mile run for fun once or twice a year. No serious racing intended.
Is the B&B/Long overkill? Am I getting more potential problems than the solutions it may solve? How about pedal pressure comparison between the two styles?
One final area of questions-if I were to go with the B&B/Long, do you think getting one with counterweights is advisable or is that asking for a headache? I've seen a 360900 with no c/w and 2200# plate load, a 360904 with c/w and 2000#, and a 360903 with c/w and 2200# load. Which, if any, would be best in my situation? Also, any advise on clutch disc would be helpful. Standard organic or a performance organic/ceramic?
Thanks to all for chiming in!