Author Topic: emax hotchkis challenger  (Read 9994 times)

Offline GoodysGotaCuda

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5392
Re: emax hotchkis challenger
« Reply #15 on: October 19, 2015 - 06:53:13 PM »

I thought 285's on a 18x9.5 wheel would hit.  Do you think it would fit since you run a 295 on a 9"?


It's been several years since I was playing with tires on the car, so I can't quite comment. I am also running a 45 series tire, so it's fairly tall.
Build Page: Goody's 'Cuda Build Page
1976 Dodge Warlock
1972 Barracuda - 5.7 Hemi + T56 Magnum

Wheel & Tire Specs:Link




Offline 72bluNblu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1836
Re: emax hotchkis challenger
« Reply #16 on: October 19, 2015 - 07:21:23 PM »

FWIW, on a 9" wheel. I don't think I'd run a 295 on a 10", personally, it might add some response to the car, but the tire will be more load sensitive and likely break traction easier.

A 295 has a ~10.9" tread width and a ~11.9 section width. Even with a 295/45/17 the minimum recommended rim width is 9.5". You're giving up tire wear and traction in all directions. Squeezing it down onto a too-small rim won't put the contact patch down the way it was designed, so it doesn't improve straight line traction.

I'm running 295/40/18 on an 11" rim with  DrDiff 1" relocation kit.

That's the way to do it!  :2thumbs: I run a 295/35/18 on my Duster with 18x10's. Even with those I'm at the minimum recommended width, which usually sacrifices some handling responsiveness on the tire. But going up to an 11" wide rim limits the choice of affordable rims pretty significantly.

I thought 285's on a 18x9.5 wheel would hit.  Do you think it would fit since you run a 295 on a 9"?

It'll depend on the car and whether or not you want to trim your fenders. Some cars will probably be fine, others might have issues with rubbing during cornering, carrying passengers etc. It will also depend a lot of your suspension- what your ride height is, how stiff your springs are, whether you run sway bars etc. The more body roll you get the more clearance you need.

You'd be surprised how many people will tell you they have massive tires on their car, but leave out the part where the tires stick out of the quarters and how the back of the car is 3' up in the air.  :icon16:
« Last Edit: October 19, 2015 - 07:26:15 PM by 72bluNblu »

Offline GoodysGotaCuda

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5392
Re: emax hotchkis challenger
« Reply #17 on: October 19, 2015 - 10:11:53 PM »
A 295 has a ~10.9" tread width and a ~11.9 section width. Even with a 295/45/17 the minimum recommended rim width is 9.5". You're giving up tire wear and traction in all directions. Squeezing it down onto a too-small rim won't put the contact patch down the way it was designed, so it doesn't improve straight line traction.

I have an 18" rear wheel. 6-7 years ago, when I purchased the tires, a 9" wheel was the minimum width recommended. I've looked and Nitto has since updated that at some point. Regardless, the street car that mine was, on old, worn out, crummy stock suspension wouldn't know the difference between a 9" or 9.5" wheel on any street surface.  :2cents:
Build Page: Goody's 'Cuda Build Page
1976 Dodge Warlock
1972 Barracuda - 5.7 Hemi + T56 Magnum

Wheel & Tire Specs:Link

Offline crash340

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1291
Re: emax hotchkis challenger
« Reply #18 on: October 19, 2015 - 11:27:53 PM »
I got 3/16"  on the front I get 1/4" (315/30R18) :wave:

I'm using Falken Azenis RT615K and they have a rim protector built into the tire , if that factors into anything?
 http://falkentire.com/tires/car-tires/azenis-rt615k-tire

Thanks Mate, thats great, right now I have 15x10's and want to eventually go 18x11, with your response I can work out if things will fit
Greg

73 Cuda
Brisbane, Australia