Why a 3.9" stroke ? I would just do a 430 CI using a 440 crank more common kit to use . now you would basically have a 440 with 7 lbs less rotating mass
You need to decide what you are doing , a 4 or 5 spd combo is a very different animal to a 2800 stall auto .
With a 4 spd you can control the lock up point , so cam choice is more workable & efficiency is much better , with 2800 stall you need to be sure you are running over that RPM @ typical highway speed or you will be constantly slipping & building heat / less fuel milage .
The cam choice is critical depending on what the rest of the combo looks like . You will need a bronze tip fuel pump rod if using a mechanical pump & a bronze dist drive with the roller cam .
I always use 3 bolt cams & have been using JP billet timing chains with 7 keyways so you can dial in the cam correctly , I like the Crane iron rockers if you can find a set , the PRW stainless are good too or Comp stainless but close to 2x the price .
You may find 2.5" pipes are more effcient with an X pipe .
Do not use a High volume oil pump with a stock pan , high pressure yes , high volume no , you can suck the oilpan completely dry with a high volume pump !
If you go 4 spd do not skimp on the clutch , a Mcleod twin dis is a good idea as you will have a lot of torque , I used a 10.95 disc behind my Duster & it lasted 3 weeks with just a strong 440 !
Hi Chryco,
I was originally thinking about a 496 c.i. stroker kit such as 440Source's but don't want to deal with short pistons, extra wear in the cylinders, etc. so backed down to the 3.9" kit as the largest/next best alternative. I've read your previous comments that longer rods are better and the Muscle motors kit uses longish 6.7" rods close to the 6.76" rod in the 430 kits. Your comment about 7 less pounds of rotating mass, how is that so? What are you comparing? I thought almost all of these stroker kits were lighter than original 383 or 440's? And other than Moper's warning about Muscle Motors slow shipping on 383 kits, are there better kits out there with the 440's 3.75" stroke? I figured quality stroker kits seem to all cost roughly the same regardless of stroke so might as well get the extra 20 cubes the 3.9" kit offers.
Transmission choice has been a tough one for me. Right now the entire 383, 727 & 8.75 drivetrain is original but I've always wanted a pistol grip manual in the car, never liking the column shift automatic. I'll keep your converter slippage advice in mind when picking stall / rear gear ratios if I stay with the auto.
2.5" pipes would actually work better as I'll definitely be running the original style tips out back and the 3" versions really don't look right. Would an 'H' pipe work as well? Sound wise I might prefer it based on what I've read, not as raspy?
I think I meant hi pressure, but I'll be careful which one I order. I have an original 440 six quart pan to replace the 383's five quart, but I would consider a bigger Milodon or other pan as long as it didn't hang down too far.
Lastly, I've read yours & others comments here that Mcleod is the way to go clutch wise so no problem there.
Thanks for the feedback, Jim