Author Topic: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc  (Read 3457 times)

Offline GreenFish

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1281
affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« on: December 15, 2015 - 10:49:59 AM »
How much affect would i see on compression by decreasing my combustion chamber by 6cc.

I'm considering a switch from Performer RPM heads (84cc) to the TF240s (78CC)

My compression will go up but by how much? Is there a mathematical equation that can figure this out?
70 cuda, 440, KB pistons, 10.5:1 compression, edlebrock heads,RacerBrown cam, 5-Speed Tremec, Megasquirt EFI




Offline ChallengerHK

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 7338
  • I'm working on it - No, really
Re: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2015 - 11:12:48 AM »
Add the swept volume, the volume of the head gasket height, and the combustion chamber volume. Divide this by the combustion chamber volume alone. Do this calculation for both chamber values and that will give you an idea of the change in static compression.


"She'll make point five past light speed. She may not look like much, but she's got it where it counts, and I've made a lot of special modifications myself."

- Han Solo, Star Wars

Advice Thread - Taking Pictures Of Cars

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2015 - 03:55:30 PM »
google compression ratio calculator .... then add it your specs
http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline ChallengerHK

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 7338
  • I'm working on it - No, really
Re: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2015 - 06:16:18 PM »
Much easier  :bigsmile:


"She'll make point five past light speed. She may not look like much, but she's got it where it counts, and I've made a lot of special modifications myself."

- Han Solo, Star Wars

Advice Thread - Taking Pictures Of Cars

Offline blown motor

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3013
Re: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2015 - 07:19:22 PM »
What is swept volume?  :dupe:
In search of the eternal buzz!

Offline ChallengerHK

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 7338
  • I'm working on it - No, really
Re: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2015 - 07:50:27 PM »
The volume of the part of the cylinder that the piston sweeps during movement.


"She'll make point five past light speed. She may not look like much, but she's got it where it counts, and I've made a lot of special modifications myself."

- Han Solo, Star Wars

Advice Thread - Taking Pictures Of Cars

Offline moparstyle

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 313
Re: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2015 - 09:16:30 PM »
Add the swept volume, the volume of the head gasket height, and the combustion chamber volume. Divide this by the combustion chamber volume alone. Do this calculation for both chamber values and that will give you an idea of the change in static compression.

Wow, you guys have knowledge........ :clapping:

Greenfish, i have a similar setup as you and is considering the same head swap.
If you are able to figure this quiz out, please post. I will just sit back and....  :popcorn:
72 Challenger, 440 stroker, 727 (70 clone)
70 Barracuda Gran Coupe
And on the side:
67 Pontiac GTO
63 Lincoln Continental

Offline blown motor

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3013
Re: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2015 - 10:24:55 PM »
The volume of the part of the cylinder that the piston sweeps during movement.

Thanks. Now that I've learned something today I can go to bed. Good night.
In search of the eternal buzz!

Offline jimynick

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4512
Re: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2015 - 11:53:36 PM »
How about a S.W.A.G.? I'll guess a half a point of CR.  :popcorn:

Offline 1 Wild R/T

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4594
Re: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« Reply #9 on: December 16, 2015 - 12:28:10 AM »
How about a S.W.A.G.? I'll guess a half a point of CR.  :popcorn:

Thats really a wag & nothing more.... on a large displacement (440) 8-1 engine 6cc won't make much difference... On a 10.5 or 11-1  small displacement (273-318) it could be a full point easily...

Use the calculator but if you do't know the right (accurate) numbers to put in the boxes then again it's just a guess...  IE Garbage in Garbage out....
JS27N0B 70 Challenger R/T Convertible  FJ5 Sublime, Show Poodle w/90,000 miles since resto
WS27L8G 68 Coronet R/T Convertible  PP1 Bright Red, Project
RM21H9E 69 Road Runner Coupe R4 Performance Red, Sold...
5H21C  65 Falcon 2 dr Wagon... Dog Hauler...

Offline Todd440

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 35
Re: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« Reply #10 on: December 16, 2015 - 06:26:29 PM »
Is this the same 440 build in your sig line?  If so, which KB piston do you have?  Flat top or step head quench head?  If it's the quench head, that may not allow you to swap heads. 
Compression ratio, for you guys who like to do it "long hand":
(Bore/2) squared=A
A times stroke times pie times 16.387
This is your swept cylinder volume in CC's.
Now, in a seperate equation:
Add head volume, dish volume, gasket volume, and down fill volume.   Add this total to the swept total, then divide by the same number.
Is that confusing!

Example for normal .030 over 440:
4.350/2 then squared=4.730
4.730x3.75 stroke x pie x 16.387= 913.26 total swept volume
84cc heads +9.9 cc head gasket+4cc's valve relief + 2 cc down fill= 99.9
So, 913.26 +99.9= 1013.16
1013.16 / 99.9=10.1417

Down fill is the amount the piston is in the hole, or below deck.  Use the swept volume equation but replace the stroke with the amount your piston is down, like .018.
Domes and quench or step heads have a opposite volume, so you subtract this amount from the second equation.

God, I must be bored!


Offline ChallengerHK

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 7338
  • I'm working on it - No, really
Re: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« Reply #11 on: December 16, 2015 - 07:06:49 PM »
God, I must be bored!

Being stroked might be better  :bigsmile:


"She'll make point five past light speed. She may not look like much, but she's got it where it counts, and I've made a lot of special modifications myself."

- Han Solo, Star Wars

Advice Thread - Taking Pictures Of Cars

Offline GreenFish

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« Reply #12 on: December 17, 2015 - 10:15:40 AM »
Add the swept volume, the volume of the head gasket height, and the combustion chamber volume. Divide this by the combustion chamber volume alone. Do this calculation for both chamber values and that will give you an idea of the change in static compression.

 :clueless:  :banghead: yeah I suck at math, going to use the calculator instead.  :roflsmiley:
70 cuda, 440, KB pistons, 10.5:1 compression, edlebrock heads,RacerBrown cam, 5-Speed Tremec, Megasquirt EFI

Offline GreenFish

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« Reply #13 on: December 17, 2015 - 10:22:27 AM »
pretty sure my KBs are flat top. The block was 0 decked.
70 cuda, 440, KB pistons, 10.5:1 compression, edlebrock heads,RacerBrown cam, 5-Speed Tremec, Megasquirt EFI

Offline GreenFish

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: affects of decrease combustion chamber by 6cc
« Reply #14 on: December 17, 2015 - 10:23:54 AM »
Is this the same 440 build in your sig line?  If so, which KB piston do you have?  Flat top or step head quench head?  If it's the quench head, that may not allow you to swap heads. 
Compression ratio, for you guys who like to do it "long hand":
(Bore/2) squared=A
A times stroke times pie times 16.387
This is your swept cylinder volume in CC's.
Now, in a seperate equation:
Add head volume, dish volume, gasket volume, and down fill volume.   Add this total to the swept total, then divide by the same number.
Is that confusing!

Example for normal .030 over 440:
4.350/2 then squared=4.730
4.730x3.75 stroke x pie x 16.387= 913.26 total swept volume
84cc heads +9.9 cc head gasket+4cc's valve relief + 2 cc down fill= 99.9
So, 913.26 +99.9= 1013.16
1013.16 / 99.9=10.1417

Down fill is the amount the piston is in the hole, or below deck.  Use the swept volume equation but replace the stroke with the amount your piston is down, like .018.
Domes and quench or step heads have a opposite volume, so you subtract this amount from the second equation.

God, I must be bored!

now i'm more confused than before.
70 cuda, 440, KB pistons, 10.5:1 compression, edlebrock heads,RacerBrown cam, 5-Speed Tremec, Megasquirt EFI