Author Topic: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump  (Read 7465 times)

Offline JMB340Challenger

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 46
High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« on: March 21, 2016 - 11:04:48 AM »
Well, I went dragracing Saturday night. The Challenger ran good! Drove about 25 miles to the track, ran 5 times and drove home! My issue is this; every single run, about 80 feet before I crossed the 1/8 mile mark, it seems I ran out of gas. Excellent pull through first and second gear to about 6000 RPM, but as I approached 80 mph, I think my fuel bowls were empty. I literally "cruised" through the 1/4 mile finish line at 14.6 @ 81 mph. (My 1/8th mile was 9.0 @ 79mph spinning like mad on BFG Radial T/As). As you can see from those numbers, I did not gain any mph in the last 1/8 mile of the track because I had to let off and just drive through.  Assuming I am diagnosing the problem correctly and it is an old worn-out fuel pump,  what would you recommend as a replacement? Mechanical vs electric? Regulators? Thanks in advance!
« Last Edit: March 21, 2016 - 02:07:04 PM by JMB340Challenger »
1970 Challenger. 11:1 340 .030 over 2.02/1.60 Ported 915s, Harland Sharp roller rockers, Victor 340 intake, Holley 750 mech secondary DP, 232/242@ .050 .528 hyd cam, MSD 6AL, MSD mech advance distributor, full manual reverse valve body 727 3500 stall, 8 3/4 489 w/ 4.10s, Truetrac differential




Offline 70chall440

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6484
Re: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2016 - 12:03:18 PM »
I would upgrade to a better mechanical to begin with.
Current Mopar
70 Challenger RT 440-6 EFI, 73 Cuda 416-6 EFI
05 Hemi Durango, 01 Ram 4x4, 14 Ram 2500 4X4, 10 PCP Challenger 6 spd RT, 01 Viper GTS ACR, 52 B3B w/330 Desoto Hemi, 70 Hemi RR (under const)
Past Mopars
9 x Challengers. AAR Cuda, 4 RR, 2 GTX, 4 Chargers, etc... (too many to list)

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2016 - 01:48:46 PM »
5/16 fuel line may be too small

but there could be other issues restricting fuel delivering

An electrice fuel pressure gauge is very helpful
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline 70chall440

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6484
Re: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2016 - 05:01:44 PM »
5/16 fuel line may be too small

but there could be other issues restricting fuel delivering

An electrice fuel pressure gauge is very helpful

 :iagree: BTW you can run a gauge with a mechanical pump (just in case you were/are wondering). If you are racing, you might think about running a gauge to the cowl (outside the car) so you can watch it. You can run them inside, but you need some special parts to keep from a fuel leak inside the car. 5/16 is pretty small if you are pushing the car.
Current Mopar
70 Challenger RT 440-6 EFI, 73 Cuda 416-6 EFI
05 Hemi Durango, 01 Ram 4x4, 14 Ram 2500 4X4, 10 PCP Challenger 6 spd RT, 01 Viper GTS ACR, 52 B3B w/330 Desoto Hemi, 70 Hemi RR (under const)
Past Mopars
9 x Challengers. AAR Cuda, 4 RR, 2 GTX, 4 Chargers, etc... (too many to list)

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2016 - 06:02:59 PM »
:iagree: BTW you can run a gauge with a mechanical pump (just in case you were/are wondering). If you are racing, you might think about running a gauge to the cowl (outside the car) so you can watch it. You can run them inside, but you need some special parts to keep from a fuel leak inside the car. 5/16 is pretty small if you are pushing the car.


Actually, my electric fuel pressure gauge comes off a small diaphram/transducer attached to the fuel line by the carb.
So all I have is a wire going to my dash area.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/sww-412m
« Last Edit: March 21, 2016 - 06:04:58 PM by cudabob496 »
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline 70chall440

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6484
Re: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2016 - 06:11:56 PM »
Actually, my electric fuel pressure gauge comes off a small diaphram/transducer attached to the fuel line by the carb.
So all I have is a wire going to my dash area.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/sww-412m


Yea I have one of those too on my Cuda.
Current Mopar
70 Challenger RT 440-6 EFI, 73 Cuda 416-6 EFI
05 Hemi Durango, 01 Ram 4x4, 14 Ram 2500 4X4, 10 PCP Challenger 6 spd RT, 01 Viper GTS ACR, 52 B3B w/330 Desoto Hemi, 70 Hemi RR (under const)
Past Mopars
9 x Challengers. AAR Cuda, 4 RR, 2 GTX, 4 Chargers, etc... (too many to list)

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2016 - 06:24:28 PM »
+ or - to both  I like the quiet simple HV mechanical pumps. Electric can be noisy but a good Mallory 110 pump works well .
 there could be a number of issues though , 5/16 line can be too small upgrading to a 3/8" line may be nessisary but do not forget about the pick up tube , it needs to be 3/8" as well  , if the filter is before the pump that can be a big problem too .
 I assume this is a 340 small block so the fuel pump pushrod is not an issue as it can be in a big block ?

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline 70chall440

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6484
Re: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2016 - 06:45:45 PM »
"I assume this is a 340 small block so the fuel pump pushrod is not an issue as it can be in a big block ?" Correct, no push rod on a SB, there is the eccentric on the cam.
Current Mopar
70 Challenger RT 440-6 EFI, 73 Cuda 416-6 EFI
05 Hemi Durango, 01 Ram 4x4, 14 Ram 2500 4X4, 10 PCP Challenger 6 spd RT, 01 Viper GTS ACR, 52 B3B w/330 Desoto Hemi, 70 Hemi RR (under const)
Past Mopars
9 x Challengers. AAR Cuda, 4 RR, 2 GTX, 4 Chargers, etc... (too many to list)

Offline JMB340Challenger

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 46
Re: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2016 - 09:46:44 PM »
Thank you for all the input. I'm thinking of trying a HP mechanical like this Edelbrock http://m.summitracing.com/parts/edl-1720 . It has 3/8 connections so I can adapt to it on the inlet and use 3/8 to the filter and carb. If I'm still having issues I'll upgrade to 3/8 from the tank.
1970 Challenger. 11:1 340 .030 over 2.02/1.60 Ported 915s, Harland Sharp roller rockers, Victor 340 intake, Holley 750 mech secondary DP, 232/242@ .050 .528 hyd cam, MSD 6AL, MSD mech advance distributor, full manual reverse valve body 727 3500 stall, 8 3/4 489 w/ 4.10s, Truetrac differential

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2016 - 11:32:26 PM »
won't make any diff, since the tank is 5/16.
Need a 3/8 sender that goes in gas tank.

sure your filter is not clogged
also, there is a sock filter inside tank that might be clogged. Inspect it first.

Dont open tank near gas water heater flame.

had a neighbor blowup and burn to death, not to mention his house burned down.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2016 - 12:42:02 AM by cudabob496 »
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline dave73chally

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1304
Re: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2016 - 09:18:40 AM »
Sorry to hijack but relevant to what I was about to post...I have a 440 with the stock 5/16" fuel lines. Plan to upgrade line size later but not yet. Anyone have a part # for a good hv mechanical fuel pump to work with my line size? The only one I see is a Carter that puts out 4-5psi which is not high volume...
73 Challenger
512 / 4spd / Hotchkis & QA1 Suspension

Offline dfrazz

  • 1970 Cuda - 1968 Charger
  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4070
Re: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« Reply #11 on: March 22, 2016 - 09:28:57 AM »
Sorry to hijack but relevant to what I was about to post...I have a 440 with the stock 5/16" fuel lines. Plan to upgrade line size later but not yet. Anyone have a part # for a good hv mechanical fuel pump to work with my line size? The only one I see is a Carter that puts out 4-5psi which is not high volume...


I would not invest money in a hv pump for your current lines if they are just temporary.  I installed a 3/8 line from Dave at Roseville, kept the 5/16 line as a return, and went with this 440source pump.  http://store.440source.com/High-Volume-Mechanical-Fuel-Pump/productinfo/138-1013/

Offline GreenFish

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2016 - 11:42:17 AM »
I'd stick with a Mechanical if i were you. I ran a Carter mech pump before switching to EFI and I was running 11's. Like others said,  Run 3/8 lines, get a gauge, and make sure there are no clogs
70 cuda, 440, KB pistons, 10.5:1 compression, edlebrock heads,RacerBrown cam, 5-Speed Tremec, Megasquirt EFI

Offline JMB340Challenger

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 46
Re: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« Reply #13 on: March 22, 2016 - 12:32:32 PM »
Good advice; thanks!
1970 Challenger. 11:1 340 .030 over 2.02/1.60 Ported 915s, Harland Sharp roller rockers, Victor 340 intake, Holley 750 mech secondary DP, 232/242@ .050 .528 hyd cam, MSD 6AL, MSD mech advance distributor, full manual reverse valve body 727 3500 stall, 8 3/4 489 w/ 4.10s, Truetrac differential

Offline rUNCHARGER

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1169
Re: High Perf. Mechanical vs Electric Fuel pump
« Reply #14 on: March 22, 2016 - 01:06:20 PM »
With my second Challenger, I pulled 7000RPM in high gear with a dual AFB Hemi with a stock Hemi fuel pump and 5/16" line. So, I don't believe a 3/8" line is necessary. If you want to change to a 3/8" it won't hurt but I don't think it is a must do.
I prefer mechanical pumps however the electric pumps are nice for filling up the carbs when this new gas evaporates at rest in hot weather. I hate the noise of an electric pump though. So I would try a larger mechanical pump with regulator first.

Sheldon