1971 Challenger Convertible Crash

Author Topic: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash  (Read 8391 times)

Offline whitesatinmopar

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 7273
  • Member Since 3/30/02
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #15 on: June 24, 2005 - 01:19:16 PM »
At least both drivers will recover. And the front clip and at least some interrior parts can be salvaged, Wrencher it would be worth while looking into buying the car as salvage/parts. Wonder if it was a BB car?
1969 Polara 500 vert.
1970 Charger 500
1971 Dart Swinger
1972 R/R 440+6 (wanabe)
1973 Challenger




Offline Wrencher

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 456
  • 73 Plain Jane 318 Auto Project
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #16 on: June 24, 2005 - 01:45:27 PM »
I'm not sure.  I've thought about contacting him about buying the salvage but I'm not sure that would be very well received right now.  If the car had comp/collison ins, the ins company will probably salvage it thru their network. 

Offline AprilsPink72Cuda

  • Global Moderator
  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4783
  • 1972 'Cuda 340/Wappingers Falls, NY
    • Klondike's Website (Check it out!)
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #17 on: June 24, 2005 - 03:35:37 PM »
I am glad to hear that everyoe involved is going to be OK.  What a shame for such a thing to happen to such a beautiful car.  It makes me feel sick inside!

Offline RusTy/SE

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5456
  • Just havin' fun
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #18 on: June 24, 2005 - 04:41:05 PM »
I want to know how fast the girl was going, as it would take alot of force to rip an old steel car in half like that....

Would a set of welded-in sub frame connectors have helped minimize the damage?
Russ
2001 Durango     1B4HS
1970 Challenger  JS29U
Restoration thread: http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=27173.0
Member since December 13, 2002

Offline CHARGER_FAN

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 872
  • Undercover Charger
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #19 on: June 24, 2005 - 04:53:37 PM »
Man, that sucks! I'm glad nobody was killed. That looks like it was really a beauty too. :'(

'70 Charger 500

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #20 on: June 25, 2005 - 11:30:35 PM »
Would a set of welded-in sub frame connectors have helped minimize the damage?

 anyhting would help , a 35 year old frame may have been weakened by now as well depending on the climate it was in

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline Andrew

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2521
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #21 on: June 25, 2005 - 11:44:57 PM »
yeah, but judging by its appearence, it was recently restored, which means they may have been replaced

Offline torredcuda

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6218
  • Epping NH joined 11/23/03
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #22 on: June 26, 2005 - 02:57:33 AM »
That`s too bad but at least he`ll recover.The 19 yr old inexperienced driver caused the accident,NOT the SUV.My wife and I have been driving SUV`s for a lot of years now and not even one close call.Obviuosly an accident can happen to anyone but it`s all in how you drive them.
Jeff
72 Barracuda 340/4spd  Torred
70 roadrunner 383/auto  In-Violet
70 Duster 360/auto drag car  (Petty Blue soon)
04 Ram 2500 5.7 Hemi

Offline camjam

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 626
  • Rare-it-T
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #23 on: June 26, 2005 - 09:40:55 AM »
I agree with torredcuda. I have a ram 3500. I am well aware of how easy it is for the back end to break out on you. I adjust my speed and driving to suit the road conditions. Speed is always a factor. If the road was noted for bad potholes then she should have been driving slower.
71 Challenger R/T 383 4spd - 1 of 10 known to have been built for canada - restored
70 Charger R/T SE 440 auto - restored


Offline GoMango

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 371
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #24 on: June 26, 2005 - 08:09:33 PM »
 :iagree: with torredcuda completely. We have our share of those type of accidents happen in the Atlanta area :boxer:

I'm glad Mason Dixon is on the road to recovery and is in such good spirits considering the way his Chally looked.
70 Challenger R/T
(Back on the road--1st time since '96)

Offline ragtopdodge

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4065
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #25 on: June 26, 2005 - 10:55:55 PM »
People drive SUVs like they're just regular cars.  They're not only unsafe in emergency maneuvers, but their 4000-6000lb curb weights make them the perfect killing machines.

Drive a car (Subaru or other AWD for up north), minivan, or truck.  I see no use for SUVs.   :boxer:
'70 318-auto Chally 'vert
'71 383-auto 'Cuda 'vert (sold)
06 300c SRT8
04 2500 QCLB 4x4 HO

Offline Andrew

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2521
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #26 on: June 26, 2005 - 10:57:55 PM »
 :iagree:

Offline torredcuda

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6218
  • Epping NH joined 11/23/03
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #27 on: June 27, 2005 - 07:32:31 AM »
So the 3/4 ton trucks guys drive are safer than an SUV?I don`t think so,might as well outlaw anything bigger than a vw bug I guess?  :dontknow:
Jeff
72 Barracuda 340/4spd  Torred
70 roadrunner 383/auto  In-Violet
70 Duster 360/auto drag car  (Petty Blue soon)
04 Ram 2500 5.7 Hemi

Offline ragtopdodge

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4065
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #28 on: June 27, 2005 - 05:17:25 PM »
So the 3/4 ton trucks guys drive are safer than an SUV?I don`t think so,might as well outlaw anything bigger than a vw bug I guess?  :dontknow:

I don't see folks driving trucks nearly as much as SUVs.  'specially womenfolk.

People have basically replaced cars w/SUVs, whether they need them or not.
'70 318-auto Chally 'vert
'71 383-auto 'Cuda 'vert (sold)
06 300c SRT8
04 2500 QCLB 4x4 HO

Offline Andrew

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2521
Re: 1971 Challenger Convertible Crash
« Reply #29 on: June 28, 2005 - 12:16:52 AM »
the reason people replace cars with suv's is because they think it will minimise the damage in a crash, when all it really does is transfer the damage to the other car, so it does make the passengers in the suv safer at the expense of the people in the smaller car, not only is this disturtbingly selfish, if everyone had an suv, it wouldnt work, both drivers will have the same safeness in their suv than smaller cars, therefore we would be back to square one, except with a whole lot more reasons

i have no problem with people who have a legitimate reason to drive an suv, i also believe in freedom of choice in what to drive, but often people (especially women) get into suv's and think their bulletproof, and that kind of attitude is what gets people killed (among other things)