Author Topic: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience  (Read 9999 times)

Offline 70chall440

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6484
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #30 on: November 25, 2016 - 04:24:21 PM »
Oh I am sure you would see that as well, more efficiency = more power. However I do not know if you would feel/see it without a dyno or time slips perhaps.
Current Mopar
70 Challenger RT 440-6 EFI, 73 Cuda 416-6 EFI
05 Hemi Durango, 01 Ram 4x4, 14 Ram 2500 4X4, 10 PCP Challenger 6 spd RT, 01 Viper GTS ACR, 52 B3B w/330 Desoto Hemi, 70 Hemi RR (under const)
Past Mopars
9 x Challengers. AAR Cuda, 4 RR, 2 GTX, 4 Chargers, etc... (too many to list)




Offline GoodysGotaCuda

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5392
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #31 on: November 26, 2016 - 07:45:38 AM »
what is advantage of multi-port?

Better drive ability and more precise fuel delivery. This is still being used today in modern cars, but is being phased out by direct injection. We won't see direct injection as a retrofit, likely ever. Due to the injector needing to be within the cylinder, similar to a diesel.

Peak power between TBI and multi port will likely be the same, I suspect you will have better throttle response and perhaps more area under the curve with multi port.

Peak power and torque is cool if you are drag racing or holding that rpm a high percentage of the time. But it's not the only thing that makes a good street car.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Build Page: Goody's 'Cuda Build Page
1976 Dodge Warlock
1972 Barracuda - 5.7 Hemi + T56 Magnum

Wheel & Tire Specs:Link

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #32 on: November 26, 2016 - 01:32:03 PM »
Better drive ability and more precise fuel delivery. This is still being used today in modern cars, but is being phased out by direct injection. We won't see direct injection as a retrofit, likely ever. Due to the injector needing to be within the cylinder, similar to a diesel.

Peak power between TBI and multi port will likely be the same, I suspect you will have better throttle response and perhaps more area under the curve with multi port.

Peak power and torque is cool if you are drag racing or holding that rpm a high percentage of the time. But it's not the only thing that makes a good street car.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Good info!
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline Mickm

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 257
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #33 on: November 26, 2016 - 08:39:13 PM »
I have been keeping up with thread but may be missing something, so I will just ask.

I have a stock 340 in the 'Cuda and have gotten a complete F.A.S.T. V1.0 EFI and a Tanks tank, fuel pump and sender.

Am I going to be happy with this??? Any advice, experiences, thoughts are appreciated.

Cheers!
Mickm
MickM

Offline 70chall440

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6484
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #34 on: November 26, 2016 - 09:37:03 PM »
it will depend on what you expect/want. It will be awesome over your carb/s, but if you are EFI smart and are trying to build a big HP/Drag car that you intend to milk every ounce of HP, I would say maybe not as you would need a more robust package. That said, I cannot speak with a lot of authority on the FAST system as I don't have enough experience with one to say (I do have one, just haven't installed it yet).
Current Mopar
70 Challenger RT 440-6 EFI, 73 Cuda 416-6 EFI
05 Hemi Durango, 01 Ram 4x4, 14 Ram 2500 4X4, 10 PCP Challenger 6 spd RT, 01 Viper GTS ACR, 52 B3B w/330 Desoto Hemi, 70 Hemi RR (under const)
Past Mopars
9 x Challengers. AAR Cuda, 4 RR, 2 GTX, 4 Chargers, etc... (too many to list)

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #35 on: November 27, 2016 - 07:01:34 PM »
Come on China, make EFI systems even cheaper!

China could probably produce the whole system and sell it for $100.

I think the first VCR player was $3000
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline Mickm

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 257
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #36 on: November 27, 2016 - 07:11:20 PM »
Thanks for the insight,
I am not build a track car , only a driver.

Anyone have experience with the F.A.S.T. system?
Cheers,
Mickm
MickM

Offline EMCD

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 849
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #37 on: November 27, 2016 - 08:11:46 PM »
Fast, Holley & MSD all collectively stink.

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #38 on: November 27, 2016 - 10:58:17 PM »
Fast, Holley & MSD all collectively stink.

Aren't they all about a $1000 or more expensive as well?
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline 70chall440

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6484
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #39 on: November 27, 2016 - 11:47:50 PM »
Guess it depends on the systems being compared. You would have to list it all side by side to really see, however FAST and Holley are generally more expensive that FI Tech or perhaps MSD.

I like my Holley system thus far, we will see how the FAST system compares in performance once I get that sorted on my Cuda.
Current Mopar
70 Challenger RT 440-6 EFI, 73 Cuda 416-6 EFI
05 Hemi Durango, 01 Ram 4x4, 14 Ram 2500 4X4, 10 PCP Challenger 6 spd RT, 01 Viper GTS ACR, 52 B3B w/330 Desoto Hemi, 70 Hemi RR (under const)
Past Mopars
9 x Challengers. AAR Cuda, 4 RR, 2 GTX, 4 Chargers, etc... (too many to list)

Offline Mickm

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 257
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #40 on: November 28, 2016 - 08:48:18 AM »
I agree about the high price but I actually have had one, in the box, for the last three years so I  just wanting to get input towards do I want to install it, sell it aND go wit the fitch or sTay wit my Holly carb setup. I know very little about efi so I am seeking knowledgeable input.
I have also read where some have purchased the tank setup from TANKS and I have purchased that as well  but I have not read thoughts after it was installed.
Any input is appreciated.
Cheers!
Mickm
« Last Edit: November 28, 2016 - 08:51:27 AM by Mickm »
MickM

Offline dfrazz

  • 1970 Cuda - 1968 Charger
  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4070
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #41 on: November 28, 2016 - 08:51:00 AM »
I have also read where some have purchased the tank setup from TANKS and I have purchased that as well  but I have not read thoughts after it was installed.
Any input is appreciated.
Cheers!
Mickm

I have the Tanks system on my Cuda (although it is a 392 Hemi) and it works great!  Very knowledgable and nice to work with and everything fit perfectly.

Offline EMCD

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 849
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #42 on: November 28, 2016 - 10:10:14 AM »
How did you run your main and return lines? Do you have any pictures? Did you upgrade the fuel pump unit?

Offline 73cudabr

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 134
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #43 on: November 28, 2016 - 10:13:10 AM »
When I told 440 source that I was looking to purchase a TBI system such as fiTech they cautioned that "overlap" on the more aggressive street cams may mess with the computer controls (vacuum readings) on them and cause the car to not run as well? I would think that if this was a problem, nobody would ever buy one, but nonetheless Id rather ask now. Any issues at WOT and 6000 RPMs with those that run these units?

Offline EbodyMod

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 467
  • Will it ever be finished????
Re: Aftermarket EFI systems.....My practical experience
« Reply #44 on: November 28, 2016 - 10:23:05 AM »
With the self learning and tuning systems they are only as good as the programming, there are limits to what they will spend time on as far developing tuning for wild cams due to the limited size of the market. with a programmable system the only limit is the guy playing with the computer. With my MSD setup they do not recommend using a cam with a duration over 250, but it is a self tuning system.  mine is a bit over 250, but seems to be ok.
 
When I told 440 source that I was looking to purchase a TBI system such as fiTech they cautioned that "overlap" on the more aggressive street cams may mess with the computer controls (vacuum readings) on them and cause the car to not run as well? I would think that if this was a problem, nobody would ever buy one, but nonetheless Id rather ask now. Any issues at WOT and 6000 RPMs with those that run these units?
:wavingflag:  Quit being offended by everything, I am sure you are doing something that upsets me, but I am not complaining about you!!! It is a free county get over yourself!