In trying to get engine-building advice, what combinations of this or that to use, I have noticed something that seems to be endemic to engine builders. The prevailing attitude seems to be "the parts I use and the way I do things is THE ONLY WAY, and everyone else's way is not as good, and the parts they use are junk". This may be somewhat of an overstatement, but most of the time that's what I notice. I'm just a carpenter- engines aren't my forte. It seems to me someone who is very experienced in their field would be less dogmatic in their advice. If someone was really knowledgable, it would seems their attitude would be a little more humble, as in "that part will work just fine for your application", or "you really don't need to be too concerned about this or that for the power level of your engine", or "that's a waste of your money". I sense builders fall into two camps- all-out racers who would have you sink $8k in a 350hp 383, or backyard builders (like backyard dog breeders) who will through any pile of parts together with no regard as to whether they will work or not. I am speaking out of frustration, because I have two engines to build, and get advice running the gamut of the engine-building spectrum. I know there are good guys out there who really know their stuff, who know more than one way to skin a cat. It's just that I'm having trouble finding them. Any suggestions?