Author Topic: Secondaries: Vacuum or Mechanical?  (Read 2242 times)

Offline 71chmark

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 771
Secondaries: Vacuum or Mechanical?
« on: March 09, 2006 - 09:28:25 AM »
Which is better?
I may be schizophrenic,
but at least I have each other




Offline MEK-Dangerfield

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 20946
  • I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
Re: Secondaries: Vacuum or Mechanical?
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2006 - 10:10:41 AM »
That's a toughie without more info. Stock or built-up? Auto, or stick shift?

  Mike

Mike

1970 Challenger - SOLD
2016 SXT+.  1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.

kudakidd

  • Guest
Re: Secondaries: Vacuum or Mechanical?
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2006 - 10:28:30 AM »
With a stick, I've always prefered mechanical secondaries (double pumper) :thumbsup:

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Secondaries: Vacuum or Mechanical?
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2006 - 01:05:21 PM »
I prefer double pump carbs too

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline MEK-Dangerfield

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 20946
  • I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
Re: Secondaries: Vacuum or Mechanical?
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2006 - 02:30:08 PM »
I prefer double pump carbs too

Yeah,
   Even in my automatic car, the old Holley double-pumper is a killer.  :burnout:

  Mike

Mike

1970 Challenger - SOLD
2016 SXT+.  1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.

Offline EVIL72

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Secondaries: Vacuum or Mechanical?
« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2006 - 04:38:15 PM »
 I've always liked Double pumpers better, but I've always run single plane intakes with an automatic.  How is the Double pumper for a duel plane with an automatic compared to a vac secondary? Is the double pumper still better?
 I picked up my first duel plane which is an Air Gap RPM for my 340 and happen to have a 700 DP laying around.
ROB
1972 Dodge Challenger 340ci
1970 Pro Street Duster (Under Construction)

Offline MEK-Dangerfield

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 20946
  • I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
Re: Secondaries: Vacuum or Mechanical?
« Reply #6 on: March 09, 2006 - 05:45:10 PM »
I've always liked Double pumpers better, but I've always run single plane intakes with an automatic.  How is the Double pumper for a duel plane with an automatic compared to a vac secondary? Is the double pumper still better?
 I picked up my first duel plane which is an Air Gap RPM for my 340 and happen to have a 700 DP laying around.

I am by NO means an expert, but I just could never get a vacuum secondary carb to work for me(I have an automatic). I have a duel plane, but that isn't the problem. I always had a slight bog when I floored it. I tried messing with different secondary springs, but I never solved the problem. Since the double-pumper always did the trick, I'm sticking with it.  :burnout:

  Mike

Mike

1970 Challenger - SOLD
2016 SXT+.  1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.

Offline sccarts1

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Re: Secondaries: Vacuum or Mechanical?
« Reply #7 on: March 09, 2006 - 11:25:04 PM »
i always prefered mechanical 'cause the let you control the WHEN !!! especially on multi-carb cars. there's nothing more annoying or more dangerous than a high powered car that launches on you unexpectedly.. also they make launching.
with street tires more do-able.

Offline Rob C

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 191
Re: Secondaries: Vacuum or Mechanical?
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2006 - 10:25:49 AM »
Vacuum secondarys are very good for gas mileage, heavy cars and general performance useage.
Mech. secondarys are great for 4spd cars, very hi po auto trans cars and excellent for the track. Light cars as well.
This is not to say that the list as writin above can not be reversed, it's just best sutied in this manor and easier to do in that order.
The amount of power the car has along with cars weight, intended purpose, cam size, intake style, rear gears and tire size would be good info to make a recomendation on what carb style and size to use. Sometimes, the info will almost dictate what should be the best choice for your car.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2006 - 10:29:10 AM by rumblefish360 »
'73 Cuda, 360, 4psd & 4.10's
'79 Dodge Magnum, 360, 727, 9-1/4 W/3.55's

Offline Robb

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1006
  • Member since: March 20, 2003 - 09:52:47 AM
Re: Secondaries: Vacuum or Mechanical?
« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2006 - 03:01:32 PM »
I am by NO means an expert, but I just could never get a vacuum secondary carb to work for me(I have an automatic). I have a duel plane, but that isn't the problem. I always had a slight bog when I floored it. I tried messing with different secondary springs, but I never solved the problem. Since the double-pumper always did the trick, I'm sticking with it.  :burnout:

  Mike

 :icon16:   me too.     Chevys, Olds' and Mopars...   double pumpers always came through when the vac secondaries were just flops. 

70 Challenger SE  (440 SIX PACK / Keisler 5 speed, R/T SE replication)       68 Sport Satellite Convertible 383 Super Commando / 727  Survivor

2002 Trans AM WS6 convertible:  DD
1999 4Runner 4x4:  lifted-locked-armored  expedition vehicle
1990 Jeep XJ 4x4:  Front Dana 60, GM-14bolt rear, 3 link, 4link, 5.38 detroits, beadlocked 40's, stretched to 110" wb  Rock Crawler

Offline JCWCuda

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 478
Re: Secondaries: Vacuum or Mechanical?
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2006 - 12:01:02 AM »
Big fan of the Good Old Holley Double Pumper myself  :bigsmile:

1974 Barracuda 360
2008 Ram 1500 Quad Cab 5.7l Hemi
1990 Jeep Cherokee 4.0l
Gone but not forgotten
1967 Barracuda 273
1976 Charger 318
2003 Dakota Quad Cab 4.7l
1988 Jeep Cherokee 4.0l

Offline EVIL72

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Secondaries: Vacuum or Mechanical?
« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2006 - 12:24:37 AM »
I am by NO means an expert, but I just could never get a vacuum secondary carb to work for me(I have an automatic). I have a duel plane, but that isn't the problem. I always had a slight bog when I floored it. I tried messing with different secondary springs, but I never solved the problem. Since the double-pumper always did the trick, I'm sticking with it.  :burnout:

  Mike
I've always had better luck with the DP too.
ROB
1972 Dodge Challenger 340ci
1970 Pro Street Duster (Under Construction)