Are they really Mopars?

News:

  • Home
  • Help
  • Chat
  • Login
  • Register

    • « previous next »
    Pages: [1] 2

    Author Topic: Are they really Mopars?  (Read 2017 times)

    Offline ESGEE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1448
    • 1970 Challenger RT/SE
      • SG´s site
    Are they really Mopars?
    « on: August 21, 2006 - 07:26:12 PM »
    Is AMX and Javelin Mopars? At some Moparmeets im seen those cars turn up, dident Javelin base their cars on GM stuff or im totally wrong here :dunno:
    Logged
    70 Challenger RT/SE(Looking for 383 Magnum N0B196875)
    70 Challenger RT/SE(Looking for 383 Magnum N0B115166)
    70 Challenger SE(RT/SE clone)
    69 Charger RT/SE 4speed Trackpac
    70 Charger 500


    Offline Carlwalski

    • C-C.com Expert
    • ********
    • Posts: 20672
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #1 on: August 21, 2006 - 07:34:33 PM »



    AMC = American Motors Company. They used different engines, trans and parts from the big 3 manufacturers.
    They were a "hybrid" car if you please. A cousin to MoPar if any though.


     :2cents: :cheers:
    Logged
    1970 Dodge Challenger R/T
    White, License Plate, 0A-5599
    540ci Aluminium Hemi, F.A.S.T EFI
    TF-727 Gear Vendor OD, Dana 60

    Offline ESGEE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1448
    • 1970 Challenger RT/SE
      • SG´s site
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #2 on: August 21, 2006 - 07:37:04 PM »
    Ok, thanks :cheers:
    Logged
    70 Challenger RT/SE(Looking for 383 Magnum N0B196875)
    70 Challenger RT/SE(Looking for 383 Magnum N0B115166)
    70 Challenger SE(RT/SE clone)
    69 Charger RT/SE 4speed Trackpac
    70 Charger 500

    Offline Topcat

    • C-C.com Expert
    • ********
    • Posts: 15376
    • Member since 9/16/04
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #3 on: August 21, 2006 - 07:42:00 PM »
    Here's some other hybrids. International Harverster...Scout II Torqueflite trans
                                        Jensen....440 ci engine. Seen these at Mopar meets before.
    Logged
    Mike, Fremont, CA.

    Offline challenger72rt

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 675
    • My l'il girl w' Dodge hat
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #4 on: August 21, 2006 - 08:48:21 PM »
    to be more specific, Chrysler bought AMC in the 80's, so when the Gremlin. Javelin and AMX came around, they were their own entities entirely..but since bought later on, they are kinda the 'red-headed step-child' of the MoPar community.  Accepted at the functions, but they gotsta sit at the kiddy table.
    Logged
    "Once upon a time I had a really bad Monday"

    Offline 71GTX

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1144
    • It's a fine line between a hobby & mental illness!
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #5 on: August 21, 2006 - 10:17:00 PM »
    In the past there were some AMC products that would put a hurtin on the competition....I welcome and embrace my fellow AMC car collectors to the MOPAR family!
    Logged
    69 RoadRunner (clone)
    70 Cuda 383 4 speed (project) one of the first few off the line at Hamtramck with a 1017XX VIN
    70 Cuda convertible 340 4 speed (project)
    70 Barracuda (project)
    71 GTX 440 4 speed (project)
    72 Cuda 340 3 speed (project)
    3 Harleys
    95 Dodge Ram 2500 Diesel 4x4

    Expensive Pee is the end result of Expensive Beer!

    Offline Street_Challenged73

    • Sr. Resident
    • ******
    • Posts: 8826
    • '73 FC-7 Challenger..Member since October 20, 2002
      • My '73 Challenger Restoration Page
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #6 on: August 21, 2006 - 10:19:28 PM »
    AMC's are the red-headed stepchilds of MoPar, but some of their cars are quite impressive. (and were unique just like MoPar muscle cars.)  Oh, and it's cool to know they were originally made here in Wisconsin. (Kenosha) :bigsmile:
    Logged
    1973 Dodge Challenger......................The ongoing project. (00/----\00)
    1991 Dodge Stealth R/T Twin-Turbo....The sunny day cruiser (RTBoost)
    1990 Toyota Celica GT Liftback...........The new daily & winter driver.
    All-American Muscle: 'Cudas and Challengers...Still the Elite and always will be.

                                                                                                 
                     
    Street_Challenged73 from Wisconsin

    Offline ESGEE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1448
    • 1970 Challenger RT/SE
      • SG´s site
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #7 on: August 22, 2006 - 04:37:26 AM »
    Thanks for letting me know, since i have wonder for a while what the f... those car turn up at Moparmeets :bigsmile:
    Logged
    70 Challenger RT/SE(Looking for 383 Magnum N0B196875)
    70 Challenger RT/SE(Looking for 383 Magnum N0B115166)
    70 Challenger SE(RT/SE clone)
    69 Charger RT/SE 4speed Trackpac
    70 Charger 500

    Offline rallyechall

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 390
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #8 on: August 22, 2006 - 05:52:13 AM »
    Don't forget Austin and Willy's. They too are under our wings. What other companies did Chrysler purchase. good trivia thread.
    Logged

    Offline ROMI

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 759
    • 71 Challenger R/T 340 4 speed, Lapeer Michigan
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #9 on: August 22, 2006 - 05:56:19 AM »
    Mitsubishi !
     :roflsmiley: :roflsmiley: :roflsmiley: :roflsmiley: :roflsmiley:
    Logged

    Offline EBODYWANNABEE

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 6
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #10 on: August 22, 2006 - 06:23:28 AM »
    Well... they did use a 360 engine didn't they :bananasmi- but I bet it wasn't the same as Chryslers. I had a friend who years ago pulled his 360 out of his mint 1970 AMX and put in a 340 with 727 out of his ragged out duster. Could you call that "Amopar"? Gary
    Logged

    Offline ESGEE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1448
    • 1970 Challenger RT/SE
      • SG´s site
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #11 on: August 22, 2006 - 06:32:09 AM »
    Quote from: ROMI on August 22, 2006 - 05:56:19 AM
    Mitsubishi !
     :roflsmiley: :roflsmiley: :roflsmiley: :roflsmiley: :roflsmiley:

    Dont scare me like that... :bigsmile:
    Logged
    70 Challenger RT/SE(Looking for 383 Magnum N0B196875)
    70 Challenger RT/SE(Looking for 383 Magnum N0B115166)
    70 Challenger SE(RT/SE clone)
    69 Charger RT/SE 4speed Trackpac
    70 Charger 500

    Offline inot2old

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1820
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #12 on: August 22, 2006 - 08:21:21 AM »
    I think Wiilys was originally bought by AMC.  When Chrysler bought AMC, they inherited the Jeep, that is the only one of AMC vehicles that is still produced.

     
    Quote from: ROMI on August 22, 2006 - 05:56:19 AM
    Mitsubishi !
     :roflsmiley: :roflsmiley: :roflsmiley: :roflsmiley: :roflsmiley:

    Mitsubishi has produced a lot of cars sold under the Chrysler label, starting with the Colts of the '70's, I think.  Even my '97 Sebring convertible shares the same platform with the Eclipse.
    Logged
    '71 Cuda 

    '70 Charger project
    '05 Crossfire Roadster

    Offline 360 'CUDA

    • Sr. Resident
    • ******
    • Posts: 5784
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #13 on: August 22, 2006 - 09:07:15 AM »
    nah
    Logged

    Offline ESGEE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1448
    • 1970 Challenger RT/SE
      • SG´s site
    Re: Are they really Mopars?
    « Reply #14 on: August 22, 2006 - 09:49:42 AM »
    Yeah but those Colts look like s... to :bigsmile: But that the Sebring shared platform whats was :faint:
    Logged
    70 Challenger RT/SE(Looking for 383 Magnum N0B196875)
    70 Challenger RT/SE(Looking for 383 Magnum N0B115166)
    70 Challenger SE(RT/SE clone)
    69 Charger RT/SE 4speed Trackpac
    70 Charger 500
    Pages: [1] 2
    « previous next »