Author Topic: Six Pack or Six Shooter ???  (Read 12191 times)

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Six Pack or Six Shooter ???
« Reply #30 on: May 02, 2007 - 10:00:00 AM »
We actually found the opposite , using a K&N filter HP was up by 5 with the AC on

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t




Offline Dave-R

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 154
    • Challenger Message Board
Re: Six Pack or Six Shooter ???
« Reply #31 on: May 03, 2007 - 06:46:03 AM »
I was relying on K&Ns own formula to calculate that! :clueless:

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Six Pack or Six Shooter ???
« Reply #32 on: May 03, 2007 - 07:33:59 AM »
possibly the shape of the AC is helping air flow into the carbs

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline Dave-R

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 154
    • Challenger Message Board
Re: Six Pack or Six Shooter ???
« Reply #33 on: May 04, 2007 - 01:12:50 AM »
Sorry. I was in too much of a hurry yesterday to explain clearly. I was late for something.

The figures I quoted are for K&N filters. The stock one is even worse!

Yes I got a vey small increase in power by fitting the K&N but top end power was still dropping off too fast just before each shift which did not match the dyno curve.

I did two things to improve things so i don't know which worked best.

I swapped out the 5/16ths fuel line I had been forced to use as a repair (between the mechanical fuel pump and the stock hard lines into the carbs) and fitted -8AN hose.

I also removed the air cleaner assembly.

My next run on the track was a disaster as that was when I lost a couple of push rods so I have no 1/4 mile time. But I can tell you my 1/8th mile never felt stronger.

I doubt the bigger fuel lines helped much because I never got to the end of the strip and the stock hard lines are less than 3/8ths anyway. So i am sure it was the effect of no air filter.

After that was when I went to the K&N website and got this formula;

CFM Formulas for Filters

Round: Diameter x Height x 6 x 3.14
Flat Panel: Length x Width x 6
Universal Round Taper: (Base + Top) / 2 = A
Take A x Length x 6 x 3.14
Universal Round Straight: Diameter x Length x 6 x 3.14

Square inches of filter required for an engine = CID x Maximum RPM / 20839

I have measured my 6 pack air filter to be 58-inches around and 2-inches tall. Unless the formula is not correct or I have made a mistake then this equates to just 696cfm of airflow.

Try it for yourself and see if we get the same result. I have a bit of brain damage at the moment and make mistakes all the time.