Author Topic: Question on rear springs  (Read 3174 times)

Offline loco340cuda

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 819
Question on rear springs
« on: September 29, 2007 - 02:45:50 PM »
I just installed a set of ESPO 1" over rear springs on my 70 Cuda and I'm a little dissapointed in that it sits kind of high in the back. I went with the 1" extra due to everybody that I talked to said the standard arch makes the car look to low in the back so go 1" over.

What I don't care for in the way that it looks is that the rear tire now looks small in the wheel well as well as the rear end sits to high. I'm running a BF Goodrich T/A 255/60/15.

My question is will the springs settle a little so it does not look so high or is this something I'm going to have to live with?
1970 Cuda 340 4-speed - now stroked to 416ci (SOLD)
2017 Mustang Shelby GT350




Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Question on rear springs
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2007 - 04:37:35 PM »
they Shoudl settle some but how much I am not sure

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

BS23VOB_FJ5_Faker

  • Guest
Re: Question on rear springs
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2007 - 05:35:28 PM »
The springs do tend to settle, but not much unless they are not very good quality.  With the good things I have heard here about Espo springs, I would not count on them settling too much.  I would really like to see a photo of how it looks with the new springs, as I was planning on ordering a set with 2" extra, and will probably go with 1" if yours is sitting the way I want mine to be. 


Offline cowboy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1615
  • Denmark
    • CowboyCars.dk
Re: Question on rear springs
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2007 - 05:52:50 AM »
  I would really like to see a photo of how it looks with the new springs, as I was planning on ordering a new set, and will probably go with 1" if yours is sitting the way I want mine to be. 



 :iagree:   :picture:
MoPar's for Cruizin, Racing & Pro-touring: www.CowboyCars.dk

1930 Plymouth Hot Rod wannabe - 1957 DeSoto Fireflite Sportsman - 1967 RaceCuda  -  1968 Barracuda  -  1971 Challenger R/T Conv.


Offline MEK-Dangerfield

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 20946
  • I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
Re: Question on rear springs
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2007 - 07:09:42 AM »
I have 255/15/60's on the back of my car with the 6 leaf springs arched 2" over stock. Mine came out exactly as I wanted it to look. It will be interesting to see how your's compares loco340cuda.


  Mike

Mike

1970 Challenger - SOLD
2016 SXT+.  1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.

Offline Bullitt-

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 12167
  • Better Things To Come Member Since 2/16/06
Re: Question on rear springs
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2007 - 08:25:09 AM »
Is it possible that the order was wreng & you received someone elses springs?



               Good excuse to get bigger tires!!!!
Wade  73 Rallye 340..'77 Millennium Falcon...13 R/T Classic   Huntsville, AL
Screwed by Photobucket!

Offline loco340cuda

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 819
Re: Question on rear springs
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2007 - 09:01:23 AM »
Unfortunately I'm leaving today to go out of town for the next couple of weeks so it will be a little while before I get some picts posted.  MEK, from looking at your picture I think my car sits just a little higher then yours in the back.

I put about 200lbs of weight in the trunk and will let it sit while I'm gone.  My thought is that maybe it will settle the springs down a little.  If that does not help, I will investigate if they sent me the wrong springs, or what I can do to lower the back end.
1970 Cuda 340 4-speed - now stroked to 416ci (SOLD)
2017 Mustang Shelby GT350

Offline matt63

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1855
Re: Question on rear springs
« Reply #7 on: September 30, 2007 - 11:00:11 AM »
AR Engineering makes front spring hangers with an extra set of holes for lowering the car 1.5".

http://www.arengineering.com/suspension/hanger/hanger.html
Matt in Edmonton

'68 Valiant
'73 Cuda 340 4 speed (408) SOLD

Offline HP2

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4478
Re: Question on rear springs
« Reply #8 on: September 30, 2007 - 11:28:30 AM »
I've got a brand new set of those, never installed. $60 if your intersted.


Offline 71340RT

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3502
Re: Question on rear springs
« Reply #9 on: September 30, 2007 - 10:47:39 PM »
Here is my 70 Cuda with 1 inch over stock springs from espo. Mine has settled down from when they were put on last fall but only about a 1/2 inch from when I installed them.


70 Plymouth Cuda 340 4-speed
71 Dodge Challenger RT 340 automatic
1973 Dodge Challenger 360 automatic EFI
2002 Harley Davidson Dyna Wide Glide
2003 Dodge Stratus RT coupe
2009 Challenger RT Classic B5 Blue
2014 Ram Express 5.7 Hemi 4X4

Offline loco340cuda

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 819
Re: Question on rear springs
« Reply #10 on: October 01, 2007 - 09:27:33 AM »
71340RT, what tire size are you running on the rear?  The way your car sits is about how I thought mine would look.  Good to know the springs will settle out some what.
1970 Cuda 340 4-speed - now stroked to 416ci (SOLD)
2017 Mustang Shelby GT350

BS23VOB_FJ5_Faker

  • Guest
Re: Question on rear springs
« Reply #11 on: October 01, 2007 - 12:07:01 PM »
71340RT, are they the 6 leaf springs?  That car is beautiful, by the way. 

Offline 71340RT

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3502
Re: Question on rear springs
« Reply #12 on: October 06, 2007 - 12:05:40 AM »
71340RT, what tire size are you running on the rear?  The way your car sits is about how I thought mine would look.  Good to know the springs will settle out some what.
When I bought my Cuda it never came with any wheels and I had a set of 14X6 so I bought a set of 225x70 14 and put them on.


70 Plymouth Cuda 340 4-speed
71 Dodge Challenger RT 340 automatic
1973 Dodge Challenger 360 automatic EFI
2002 Harley Davidson Dyna Wide Glide
2003 Dodge Stratus RT coupe
2009 Challenger RT Classic B5 Blue
2014 Ram Express 5.7 Hemi 4X4

Offline 71340RT

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3502
Re: Question on rear springs
« Reply #13 on: October 06, 2007 - 12:07:36 AM »
71340RT, are they the 6 leaf springs?  That car is beautiful, by the way. 
I went the stock 5 leaf springs for a better ride and I have had both and there is a difference.


70 Plymouth Cuda 340 4-speed
71 Dodge Challenger RT 340 automatic
1973 Dodge Challenger 360 automatic EFI
2002 Harley Davidson Dyna Wide Glide
2003 Dodge Stratus RT coupe
2009 Challenger RT Classic B5 Blue
2014 Ram Express 5.7 Hemi 4X4

Offline AMXguy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1035
Re: Question on rear springs
« Reply #14 on: October 06, 2007 - 10:27:42 AM »
I put the Mopar springs on my Challenger and they sit a little low for my taste so I had to raise it a little.

 When you put your springs on did you put all the weight back on the springs before you tightened the axle U bolts? it will make a little difference. On my AMX's the ESPO springs settled about 1/2", so I wouldn't count on much more than that.  what I did with them was make about a 3/4" lowering block by taking the right size peice of metal , drilling a hole all the way through, then welding a bolt in the hole leaving room for the tie bolt at the top and enough sticking out the bottom to replace the tie bolt in the spring pad. then if the springs ever sags enough you can just remove it.
1970 R/T SE Challenger
 1970 Superbee
 1969 S code Mach 1
 1967  GTO