What a crook!!

News:

  • Home
  • Help
  • Chat
  • Login
  • Register

    • « previous next »
    Pages: 1 [2] 3

    Author Topic: What a crook!!  (Read 2520 times)

    Offline burnt orange

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 782
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #15 on: November 26, 2007 - 11:20:36 AM »
    Logged
    < ° ) ) >< 


    Offline wunderless

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 191
    • But existing is basically all I do!
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #16 on: November 26, 2007 - 12:04:24 PM »
    The pictures are a little less misleading, at least now you can see it's not a 426.  But the add is still written in a misleading manner. 
    Logged
    But existing is basically all I do!

    Offline bb71challenger

    • Sr. Resident
    • ******
    • Posts: 6549
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #17 on: November 26, 2007 - 04:37:41 PM »
    Yeah it is still misleading, he answers the question of whether it has a hemi crate engine by saying it is "date coded engine from the period" WTF????? since when does a 354 from the mid 50's equate to a period correct engine for a car built after 1970???  That guy is  :crazy:
    Logged
    1971 Challenger (OO==== ====OO) getting close!
    1970 Challenger (OO########OO) long ways off
    *Brett*

    Offline wunderless

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 191
    • But existing is basically all I do!
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #18 on: November 26, 2007 - 06:22:25 PM »
    Well it's period correct for the period of 1945 to 1975.  I wonder if that's what he meant?
    Logged
    But existing is basically all I do!

    Offline 73Chally

    • Resident
    • *****
    • Posts: 2381
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #19 on: November 26, 2007 - 07:11:17 PM »
    I've emailed this seller a couple times with legitimate questions, but have yet to get a response.  Anyone else try?  :dunno:

    Oops. just got a response back.  I asked what the motor is, since it obviously is not a 426.  His response:

    nope. it is a 392 stroked to a 425
    I think it is a 1970 code

    Gregg
     :clueless:
    « Last Edit: November 26, 2007 - 07:17:14 PM by 73Chally »
    Logged

    Offline 71GTX

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1144
    • It's a fine line between a hobby & mental illness!
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #20 on: November 26, 2007 - 07:39:44 PM »
    I believe that the 392 were only produced for 2 or 3 years total for cars. 57, 58, and I am thinking 59.
    Logged
    69 RoadRunner (clone)
    70 Cuda 383 4 speed (project) one of the first few off the line at Hamtramck with a 1017XX VIN
    70 Cuda convertible 340 4 speed (project)
    70 Barracuda (project)
    71 GTX 440 4 speed (project)
    72 Cuda 340 3 speed (project)
    3 Harleys
    95 Dodge Ram 2500 Diesel 4x4

    Expensive Pee is the end result of Expensive Beer!

    Offline IMNCARN82

    • Resident
    • *****
    • Posts: 3547
    • LeDZeP
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #21 on: November 26, 2007 - 07:54:09 PM »
    43 thousand dollars!!    :screwy:   
    Logged
    '73 340 5 speed,RMS,BAER,... "Supercuda" (O[   ]||||[   ]O)  
    '69 Dodge Charger 383,Auto                  (OiiiiiiiiiiIiiiiiiiiiiO)
    13' Challenger R/T BlacktoP  6spd. (OO________OO)
    71' Demon
    75' Duster
    87' Conquest TSI
    56' Plaza
    Boulder CO
    Robert    "cuda bob"

    Offline 73Chally

    • Resident
    • *****
    • Posts: 2381
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #22 on: November 26, 2007 - 07:55:24 PM »
    Quote from: 71GTX on November 26, 2007 - 07:39:44 PM
    I believe that the 392 were only produced for 2 or 3 years total for cars. 57, 58, and I am thinking 59.

    That's what I was thinking, also, and I mentioned it to the seller.  He wrote back and said he thought it was a '69 motor.  I would not be the least bit surprised if the buyer from the previous auction disputed this as a misrepresented listing, and that's why it's back on.
    Logged

    Offline 73Chally

    • Resident
    • *****
    • Posts: 2381
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #23 on: November 26, 2007 - 08:21:52 PM »
    This guy is definitely being deceptive.  He just wrote me back saying that there is no mention of 426 Hemi in the listing.  Apparently he missed the first line about the 426 badging and dressing, or his response to the first question about it being an original period correct motor.  Is this worth reporting to Ebay as fraud, or should it just play out and hope no one falls for his deception?
    Logged

    Offline Super Blue 72

    • Permanent Resident
    • *******
    • Posts: 12711
    • "Big 'n Little" Member since 8/9/05
      • Phil's Super Blue '72
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #24 on: November 26, 2007 - 08:31:19 PM »
    Quote from: MJS73 on November 21, 2007 - 11:51:14 AM
    Hard to tell what engine is in it, but how does he get a "real" JS R/T in '72?

    Mike

    Yep, misleading all the way.... although it should be a Rallye car in his listing,  my Consumer Information Sheet for my '72 JS Rallye Challenger says "Challenger R/T" on it from the factory.  :dunno:
    Logged
    1972 Dodge Challenger Rallye 340, AT, Code TB3=Super Blue, SBD=8/17/1971.  Yes, a Rallye without the fender louvers from the factory because of the body side molding option.

    Pic #2 and 3 of my ARII 1/24 scale model car 

    Phil in New England-Massachusetts  Always thank God for what you have!

    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/456046/1972-dodge-challenger

    Offline Hopalong

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 1054
    • HEAD OFF! Apply directly to the neck line!
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #25 on: November 26, 2007 - 08:32:04 PM »
    Well, he was truthful on one thing.  Sub Lime is a rare color, for 1972.
    Logged
    {oo/===\oo}

    nivvy

    • Guest
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #26 on: November 26, 2007 - 08:53:11 PM »
    still a cool hemi.........
    Logged

    Offline 73Chally

    • Resident
    • *****
    • Posts: 2381
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #27 on: November 26, 2007 - 08:57:57 PM »
    It is definitely nice, I just feel bad for someone who might plunk down the BIN thinking its a 426.  The seller should have specifically stated its a 392 instead of doing everything he could to insinuate that it is a 426, that's what has me bugged.  I know too many people who have been deceived on Ebag before.
    Logged

    Offline 426HEMI

    • Sr. Resident
    • ******
    • Posts: 5187
    • My M46 Barracuda! Member Since:October 01, 2005
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #28 on: November 26, 2007 - 09:01:36 PM »
    He should be up front with everyone about the engine size.  Yes he does have a hemi but it is not the 426.
    Logged
    Got a pretty good start on my M46 optioned Barracuda restoration but now it is on hold till I can gather more funds.  Still need a few parts for it.  SIU Graduate 75 AAS Automotive Tech, 94 BS Advanced Tech Studies, 1997 MSED Workforce Education and Development

    1970 M46 Barracuda
    1998 Dodge Darango

    Gordon

    Offline gkring

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 825
    Re: What a crook!!
    « Reply #29 on: November 26, 2007 - 10:21:58 PM »
    Covering his butt a little better on the second auction by removing the fake motor pics and putting in pics of the actual motor in the car. Still deliberately misleading. He knows it's a 392, but won't state it in the ad. Even a Chevy guy who doesn't know any better doesn't deserve to get taken. Surely no Mopar person would ever be fooled.
    Logged
    Greg
    1970 Challenger convertible-in process
    1970 Barracuda driver
    Pages: 1 [2] 3
    « previous next »