Author Topic: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????  (Read 2622 times)

Offline Jacksboys

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5540
  • Here Since 08/28/06 GEORGIA
1971 Dodge Challenger:  360/904/3.23
   
Success is the maximum utilization of the ability that you have. - Zig Ziglar




Offline tactransman

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5401
  • 1973 Challenger- Member here since April 14, 2006
Re: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2008 - 01:19:44 PM »
Looks more like a '68 to me! :lol2:
Terry-tactransman 
Torqueflite/Automatic Transmission Specialist
Union, Mo.
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day,teach him to fish and he eats for a lifetime.

Offline Jacksboys

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5540
  • Here Since 08/28/06 GEORGIA
Re: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2008 - 01:38:05 PM »
1971 Dodge Challenger:  360/904/3.23
   
Success is the maximum utilization of the ability that you have. - Zig Ziglar

Offline Rare_T_A

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3916
    • Freiss Family Mopar Site
Re: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2008 - 02:03:14 PM »
What do you expect from a Chevy rag?
'09 Challenger R/T  5.7 HEMI Auto
'70Challenger T/A 340 727

Fargo, N. Dak.
My web Site:  http://freiss.co.nr

My Flikr Page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/102813164@N04/

I was born with nothing and I still have most of it left!

sleepychallenger

  • Guest
Re: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2008 - 02:06:36 PM »
What do you expect from a Chevy rag?
  :iagree:

maybe they think it came out with the slowmaro

Offline Pistol Gripper

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3124
  • Member since: Dirt was under warranty
Re: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????
« Reply #5 on: February 11, 2008 - 02:12:00 PM »
Nice !

I'm not familiar with the magazine, is it some local publication or maybe one of the largest in the freakin world ?  :pullinghair:

P.G.
O ne
B ig
A $$
M istake
A merica

Offline Street_Challenged73

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8826
  • '73 FC-7 Challenger..Member since October 20, 2002
    • My '73 Challenger Restoration Page
Re: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2008 - 02:24:32 PM »
That's one sweet In-voilet '67 Plymouth Challenger 354 Hemi!!! ::)  Seriously, it's a national publication, so you'd think they would at least get car details correct.
1973 Dodge Challenger......................The ongoing project. (00/----\00)
1991 Dodge Stealth R/T Twin-Turbo....The sunny day cruiser (RTBoost)
1990 Toyota Celica GT Liftback...........The new daily & winter driver.
All-American Muscle: 'Cudas and Challengers...Still the Elite and always will be.

                                                                                             
                 
Street_Challenged73 from Wisconsin

Offline FJ5_440

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 879
  • Wisconsin
Re: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2008 - 02:31:09 PM »
Even if they managed to get the cars year right, how in the world would you call an in-violet and white fully badged and striped Hemi Challenger RT a sleeper?  It is faster than I would expect a trailer queen to be, but is no sleeper in my book.

A four door 73 valiant with a twin turboed 340 is a sleeper.  A Hemi Challenger is not.
** Shane **

Offline 71340RT

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3502
Re: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????
« Reply #8 on: February 11, 2008 - 02:45:11 PM »
Makes me realize the person who wrote this feature must be very young or a brand X only person. They proof read this and no one caught it.


70 Plymouth Cuda 340 4-speed
71 Dodge Challenger RT 340 automatic
1973 Dodge Challenger 360 automatic EFI
2002 Harley Davidson Dyna Wide Glide
2003 Dodge Stratus RT coupe
2009 Challenger RT Classic B5 Blue
2014 Ram Express 5.7 Hemi 4X4

Offline HemiOrange70

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2062
Re: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????
« Reply #9 on: February 11, 2008 - 02:56:50 PM »
Looks more like a '68 to me!
Nope, the '68 had single : headlights
 :cheers:

Offline MJS73

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1522
    • Mike's 1973 Challenger
Re: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2008 - 03:38:26 PM »
Dave has since sold that car.

Mike
www.mikes73.com
Don't PM me - send me an e-mail at mjsavage2001@yahoo.com


sleepychallenger

  • Guest
Re: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????
« Reply #11 on: February 11, 2008 - 03:55:57 PM »
Even if they managed to get the cars year right, how in the world would you call an in-violet and white fully badged and striped Hemi Challenger RT a sleeper?  It is faster than I would expect a trailer queen to be, but is no sleeper in my book.

A four door 73 valiant with a twin turboed 340 is a sleeper.  A Hemi Challenger is not.
:iagree:

nivvy

  • Guest
Re: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????
« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2008 - 04:06:02 PM »
1.95 60fts and 122 miles per hour says thats a 10 second car with the right tires.....

Offline ChallengerGary

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3040
    • Challenger Gary
Re: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2008 - 04:17:54 PM »
A high impact Hemi Powered Pony Car a SLEEPER!?!?!? WTF?!?!?!  Not to mention the either poor editorial skills or total lack of knowledge...
2006 Dodge Ram 1500 Mega Cab 5.7 Hemi

1972 Dodge Demon - "new" project

AND TOO MANY OTHER MOPARS THROUGH MY HANDS TO COUNT

Offline Jacksboys

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5540
  • Here Since 08/28/06 GEORGIA
Re: 1967 Dodge Challenger - Super Sleeper ?????????
« Reply #14 on: March 07, 2008 - 02:56:54 AM »
I emailed them about the mistake and they tried to fix it:

http://www.hotrod.com/featuredvehicles/hrdp_0307_1970_dodge_challenger/index.html
1971 Dodge Challenger:  360/904/3.23
   
Success is the maximum utilization of the ability that you have. - Zig Ziglar