Author Topic: The Big Sheetmetal Product Review Board (AMD, Goodmark, etc.)  (Read 15939 times)

Offline Lunchbox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1948
The Big Sheetmetal Product Review Board (AMD, Goodmark, etc.)
« on: February 28, 2008 - 02:24:25 AM »
I was thinking it would be nice to have a centralized location to find write ups on the many new AMD products. So...post your pics and your reviews for all to read. I will start first.

I bought the lower windshield kit for around $190. The kit comes with...


-The hard part was removing the old pieces from the car. There were a few hard to get at spot welds but after that they came out pretty easy.
-The AMD pieces fit nice. The only area that needed a little tweeking was where I will have to splice the A-pillar. The AMD pieces were a little bit higher then the cars profile, but I was able to flatten the AMD part in the vise slightly and now it fits like it should.
-The two smaller pieces in the kit I will not be using since mine are in good condition. However they also look like they would fit good.
-The metal thickness is very close to the originals.
-The holes that are located in the parts match up the same as the orignals for the door hinge bolts.

« Last Edit: November 27, 2008 - 12:01:03 AM by Lunchbox »




Offline gkring

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 825
Re: The Big AMD Product Review Board
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2008 - 11:15:37 AM »
where do the little pieces go? The curved window channel on my convert are rusted so I was considering these.
Greg
1970 Challenger convertible-in process
1970 Barracuda driver

Offline Lunchbox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1948
Re: The Big AMD Product Review Board
« Reply #2 on: February 29, 2008 - 03:01:25 AM »
Look at the last pic, I believe it is F.

Lunch

Offline CHUCKS71

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1123
  • "IF YOUR NOT FIRST YOUR LAST"
Re: The Big AMD Product Review Board
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2008 - 08:45:45 AM »
 :iagree: They fit very well and I did what Lunchbox said  to flatten the AMD part in the vise slightly to make it fit like it should.                                      Nice hint!  Chuck
 
:burnout::22yikes::burnout:    www.ronpaul2008.com
71 Challenger 4spd   www.conservativepunk.com
03 Ram diesel 6spd    http://s105.photobucket.com/albums/m222/chucknutz/1971%20Challenger/

Offline mopardave

  • Sponsor
  • Resident
  • ***
  • Posts: 3294
  • 1973 Challenger F8 in and out, 68 383,727 3.23 pos
    • rosevillemoparts
Re: The Big AMD Product Review Board
« Reply #4 on: April 07, 2008 - 09:15:38 PM »
hey guys, glad to see the parts on the cars and that they actually fit. common question of does the repop parts work, good job, we are doing some restoration work at the dealer now and using the parts that we sell to help with those questions
Mopar Dave
Rosevillemoparts.com

if I haven't replied to your post or PM email me direct    dradcliffe@mikeriehls.com




70 FK5 Challenger RT/SE
70 FC7 70 Road Runner - Sold
71 FM3 Challenger RT
71 Cuda (in process for restoration)
73 F8 Challenger
1990 XJ - sold
2000 Dakota Quad Cab
2010 Ram Crew Cab 2500 4wd - sold
2015 Ram Crew Cab 2500 4wd Black Out

Offline A R T

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
  • Looks like some one needs to be frisked....
    • Auto Rust Technicians/Safe-T-Cap
Re: The Big AMD Product Review Board
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2008 - 03:40:12 PM »
We just did a 1970 AAR Cuda with a lot of the new parts from AMD.
Excellent stuff. As we have found over the years, no 2 cars are alike, and you might need to tweak some stuff. Nothing major, just minor corrections. We also did a 71 Challenger Convertible, with the OEM quarters, and shaker hood as well as the trunk floor, and cowl side boxes. Very good fit, very good quality.
You will be happy with any of the new stuff, we are.

Dave

 :cheers:
Nothing to see here folks, Its just a Bluesmobile.

Offline A110235

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 414
  • '71 Challenger JH23G1B
Re: The Big AMD Product Review Board
« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2008 - 10:54:31 PM »
I just got my inner wheelhouse today.  It looks good and it matches up well with the outer wheelhouse and the trunk floor extension.  Thanks AMD!

Kyle







Nashville, TN         Member since October 09, 2004

Offline Lunchbox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1948
Re: The Big AMD Product Review Board
« Reply #7 on: May 04, 2008 - 05:35:31 PM »
I just got my inner wheelhouse today.  It looks good and it matches up well with the outer wheelhouse and the trunk floor extension.  Thanks AMD!

Kyle







Looks good, thanks for the post. Nice to see these are being made now.  :2thumbs:

Offline AZDAN

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 191
Re: The Big AMD Product Review Board
« Reply #8 on: May 06, 2008 - 09:29:05 PM »
I have the 70-71 Tail panel and it seems to be a good piece and fit well on the test fit.

Offline Lunchbox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1948
Re: The Big AMD Product Review Board
« Reply #9 on: May 07, 2008 - 05:11:22 PM »
I have the 70-71 Tail panel and it seems to be a good piece and fit well on the test fit.


:useless:

Er, I mean post up some pics for us   :bigsmile:

Offline Lunchbox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1948
Re: The Big AMD Product Review Board
« Reply #10 on: May 30, 2008 - 02:10:38 AM »
Well I bit the bullet and spent my economic stimulus check on a new AMD cowl. I had been working on my original and it was looking good for awhile but I just wan't happy with the way it was turning out. Since I had good luck with AMD's lower windshield

The product overall was pretty good there were a few issues that bothered me but should be a pretty easy fix.

-The sides of the cowl where it is spot welded to the firewall was different compare to my 70.
-Then bends where the edge of the windsheild sits wern't crips enough to fully seat in the firewall bend.
-The tabs that the dash bolts too, weren't bent at the proper angle.
-It was tought to get all the holes to line up and the cowl sit properly on the car (i.e. a/c hoes, accelerater cable, boster bolts)
-The drain hole located in the center windshield recess is in the wrong place, and a slight amount of water would remain in the recess.

For the most part the cowl was pretty good repo. The defects shouln't be to hard to fix if one wanted.

Offline larry4406

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 366
Re: The Big AMD Product Review Board
« Reply #11 on: May 30, 2008 - 05:52:21 AM »
aren't the VIN numbers stamped in the cowl on E-bodies?  I assume you loose the VIN when you install this?  Do you cut the VIN section out and move it to the new repo piece?

Offline mopardave

  • Sponsor
  • Resident
  • ***
  • Posts: 3294
  • 1973 Challenger F8 in and out, 68 383,727 3.23 pos
    • rosevillemoparts
Re: The Big AMD Product Review Board
« Reply #12 on: May 30, 2008 - 08:53:47 AM »
Lunch,
good to see your progress and post on the AMD product,
Mopar Dave
Rosevillemoparts.com

if I haven't replied to your post or PM email me direct    dradcliffe@mikeriehls.com




70 FK5 Challenger RT/SE
70 FC7 70 Road Runner - Sold
71 FM3 Challenger RT
71 Cuda (in process for restoration)
73 F8 Challenger
1990 XJ - sold
2000 Dakota Quad Cab
2010 Ram Crew Cab 2500 4wd - sold
2015 Ram Crew Cab 2500 4wd Black Out

Offline Lunchbox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1948
Re: The Big AMD Product Review Board
« Reply #13 on: May 30, 2008 - 11:37:16 AM »
aren't the VIN numbers stamped in the cowl on E-bodies?  I assume you loose the VIN when you install this?  Do you cut the VIN section out and move it to the new repo piece?

Yes you would loose the body numbers if you went repo. I haven't decided what I am going to do yet.  :clueless:
« Last Edit: May 30, 2008 - 11:42:30 AM by Lunchbox »

Offline DMZ73

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1482
    • http://www.pbase.com/dmz73/
Re: The Big AMD Product Review Board
« Reply #14 on: May 30, 2008 - 05:24:39 PM »
Lunch,

You are going to town on that car!

Glad to see the progress.
I am equally frustrated with repros. It seems like they are designed as a single unit rather than a system.
ex.( dutchman does not mate to the rear quarter symmetrically, changing the gap tolerance from the quarter to the decklid.)
Does the firewallknow the part it needs to connect to-i.e. the HVAC unit?
I hope these issues arecorrected in futire releases.
I am waiting on door-skins.

Dan
One E body saved, 7 years and counting.