Author Topic: This Lady should run for President! (Read 3379 times)

moparnut · « **on:** April 16, 2008 - 11:18:57 PM »

I don't know who wrote it but they should have signed it. Some powerful words. This woman should run for president.

Written by a housewife from New Jersey and sounds like it! This is one ticked off lady.

"Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was it not started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September 11, 2001?

Were people from all over the world, mostly Americans, not brutally murdered that day, in downtown Manhattan , across the Potomac from our nation's capitol and in a field in Pennsylvania ?

Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or crushing death that day, or didn't they?

And I'm supposed to care that a copy of the Koran was "desecrated" when an overworked American soldier kicked it or got it wet?..Well, I don't. I don't care at all.

I'll start caring when Osama bin Laden turns himself in and repents for incinerating all those innocent people on 9/11.

I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East start caring about the Holy Bible, the mere possession of which is a crime in Saudi Arabia

I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off Nick Berg's head while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat.

I'll care when the cowardly so-called "insurgents" in Iraq come out and fight like men instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in mosques.

I'll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search of nirvana care about the innocent children within range of their suicide bombs.

I'll care when the American media stops pretending that their First Amendment liberties are somehow derived from international law instead of the United States Constitution's Bill of Rights

In the meantime, when I hear a story about a brave marine roughing up an Iraqi terrorist to obtain information, know this: I don't care.

When I see a fuzzy photo of a pile of naked Iraqi prisoners who have been humiliated in what amounts to a college-hazing incident, rest assured: I don't care.

When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take it to the bank: I don't care.

When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and fed "special" food that is paid for by my tax dollars, is complaining that his holy book is being "mishandled," you can absolutely believe in your heart of hearts: I don't care.

And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled "Koran" and other times "Quran." Well, Jimmy Crack Corn and-you guessed it-I don't care !!

If you agree with this viewpoint, pass this on to all your E-mail friends. Sooner or later, it'll get to the people responsible for this ridiculous behavior!

If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete button. Should you choose the latter, then please don't complain when more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great Country! And may I add:

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the Marines don't have that problem" -- Ronald Reagan

I have another quote that I would like to add AND.......I hope you forward all this.

"If we ever forget that we're One Nation Under God, then we will be a nation gone under." Also by.. Ronald Reagan

One last thought for the day:

In case we find ourselves starting to believe all the Anti-American sentiment and negativity, we should remember England 's Prime Minister Tony Blair 's words during a recent interview. When asked by one of his Parliament members why he believes so much in America , he said: "A simple way to take measure of a country is to look at how many want in.. And how many want out."

Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you:

1. Jesus Christ

2. The American G. I.

One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.

YOU MIGHT WANT TO PASS THIS ON, AS MANY SEEM TO FORGET BOTH OF THEM. AMEN!

72hemi · « **Reply #1 on:** April 16, 2008 - 11:30:01 PM »

That is awesome.

ChallengerHK · « **Reply #2 on:** April 16, 2008 - 11:30:44 PM »

Grancoupe · « **Reply #3 on:** April 16, 2008 - 11:37:09 PM »

I would love to see this not only spread throughout our own country but to a few of our so called allied countries as well.

moparnut · « **Reply #4 on:** April 16, 2008 - 11:46:40 PM »

In my opinon,we should clean out all our prisons,hand them all an AK,drop them off in Iraq and let-um Get-R-done.Kill 2 birds with one stone.Now i call that "Tax Relief"

72hemi · « **Reply #5 on:** April 16, 2008 - 11:51:22 PM »

Quote from: moparnut on April 16, 2008 - 11:46:40 PM

In my opinon,we should clean out all our prisons,hand them all an AK,drop them off in Iraq and let-um Get-R-done.Kill 2 birds with one stone.Now i call that "Tax Relief"

:iagree:THat is a great idea. My dad has been saying that for years.

Ornamental · « **Reply #6 on:** April 17, 2008 - 04:48:33 AM »

Quote from: Grancoupe on April 16, 2008 - 11:37:09 PM

I would love to see this not only spread throughout our own country but to a few of our so called allied countries as well.

Sadly, you're absolutely right.
There are many here in Norway who needs to hear this.

We have a coalition government, which includes the Socialist Leftparty. To keep them in the government, and saving the coalition rule, some of their demands must be met. One of their demands is that norwegian soldiers are not allowed to fight in the south. Some norwegians have joined the danish army to do so. The will is there on boot level, but to some in the pathetic excuse for a government we have, it's more important to be against USA (And Israel) than being for a positive change in Afghanistan.
Often, it's heard from the saloon-radicals that "war never solves anything". How they can have NOT heard about for instance WWII is beyond me. Many honestly believes that just throwing money after the problem will solve it, not for one moment stopping to think about corruption, and where the money eventually ends up. No, it's all about "caring". Making an actual difference would involve security, which requires the will to do bad things to bad people, and we can't have that, can we now...?

Even had a leftist friend spew some utter BS about how we who went to serve in Afghanistan are brainwashed, that stupid effing heliumhead appearently gets all her information pre-packaged by extreme leftist gurus, and muslim fanatics. Guess what, she didn't know anything at all about key players in Afghanistan, or anything about recent history other than that "everything is the west's fault". I try to offer a different point of view, but it's like pissing against the wind.

The halfbrained lefties just want to bask in their own glorious aura of "tolerance", "peacefulness", and "absolute certainity of being Right" but when something actually has to be done, they blame USA for not doing it, unless USA does so. Then it's time to be upset because USA does it "wrong".

Ornamental · « **Reply #7 on:** April 17, 2008 - 05:11:34 AM »

Came to think the last two questions in a Der Spiegel (German magazine) interview with John Bolton, you can read it here:
http://www.globalpolitician.com/23923-politics

SPIEGEL: What kind of foreign policy will the next president pursue?

Bolton: If you get a President (Hillary) Clinton, you might well find, just as after Vietnam, that there is a retraction from Iraq and of American influence in the world. And in a couple of years the Europeans will be complaining about that too. See how long American troops last in Europe under an administration that thinks it is time for America to come home.

SPIEGEL: Is that a threat?

Bolton: No. The European Union can now act like a major power, at least that is what the European Union tells us. So they should do so -- they can experiment with Russia.

SPIEGEL: Mr. Ambassador, thank very much for taking the time to speak with us.

Chryco Psycho · « **Reply #8 on:** April 17, 2008 - 05:15:45 AM »

Aussie Challenger · « **Reply #9 on:** April 17, 2008 - 05:52:14 AM »

That statement is well put, here in Australia we have wall to wall socialist governments making any excuse and sucking up to the green fantasy living in a dream party.

They bury their heads in their own backsides and cannot see what really is happening.

Honest and caring people all over the world are being subjected to a barrage of negative dribble from the do-goody supporting press.

This type of honesty should be spread far and wide, let the truth be told.

burnt orange · « **Reply #10 on:** April 17, 2008 - 06:31:02 PM »

Chryco Psycho · « **Reply #11 on:** April 18, 2008 - 02:27:00 AM »

Subject: A Must Read - Chilling!!

A Must Read - Terrorism
>
>
>
> This is worth the read � it was authored by an Attorney in a letter to his sons.
>
> This is such a sobering letter ......
>
> >
> Muslim terrorists and the U.S.A. :
>
> A different spin on the war in Iraq: This WAR is REAL
>
>
>
> To get out of a difficulty, one usually must go through it. Our country is now facing the most serious threat to its existence, as we know it, that we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which includes WWII).
>
>
>
> The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the fact that there are very few of us who think we can possibly lose this war and even fewer who realize what losing really means.
>
>
>
> First, let's examine a few basics:
>
>
>
> 1 When did the threat to us start?
>
>
>
> Many will say September 11, 2001. The answer, as far as the United States is concerned, is 1979, 22 years prior to September 2001, with the following attacks on us:
>
> * Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979; * Beirut , Lebanon Embassy 1983; * Beirut, Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983; * Lockerbie , Scotland Pan-Am flight to New York 1988; * Firs t New York World Trade Center attack 1993; * Dhahr an , Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military complex 1996; * Nairobi , Kenya US Embassy 1998; * Dares Salaam , Tanzania US Embassy 1998; * Aden , Yemen USS Cole 2000; * New York World Trade Center 2001;
>
> * Pentagon 2001.
>
>
>
> (Note: during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581 terrorist attacks worldwide.)
>
>
>
> 2 Why were we attacked?
>
>
>
> Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms. The attacks happened during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton and Bush 2. We cannot fault either the Republicans or Democrats, as there were no provocations by any of the presidents or their immediate predecessor, President Ford.
>
>
>
> 3 Who were the attackers?
>
>
>
> In each case, the attacks on the US were carried out by Muslims.
>
>
>
> 4 What is the Muslim population of the World?
>
>
>
> 25%.
>
>
>
> 5 Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?
>
>
>
> Hopefully, but that is really not material. There is no doubt that the predominately Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under the dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also Christian), that made no difference. You either went along with the administration or you were eliminated. There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by the Nazis for political reasons (including 7,000 Polish priests).
>
>
>
> (see
http://www.Nazis.testimony.co.uk/7-a.htm
>
>
>
> Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis as the six million holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom hear of anything other than the Jewish atrocities. Although Hitler kept the world focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy in killing anyone who got in the way of his extermination of the Jews or of taking over the world - German, Christian, or any others.
>
>
>
> Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the world on the US , but kill all in the way -- their own people or the Spanish, British, French or anyone else. The point here is that, just like the peaceful Germans were of no protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing -- by their own pronouncements -- killing all of us 'infidels' I don't blame the peaceful Muslims. What would you do if the choice was to remain silent or be killed?
>
>
>
> 6 So who are we at war with?
>
>
>
> There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than the Muslim terrorists. Trying to be politically correct and avoid verbalizing this conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to win if you don't clearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting.
>
>
>
> So with that background, now to the two major questions:
>
> 1 Can we lose this war?
>
>
>
> 2 What does losing really mean?
>
>
>
> If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions:
>
>
>
> We can definitely lose this war and, as anomalous as it may sound, the major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the answer to the second question - What does losing mean?
>
>
>
> It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means hanging our heads, bringing the troops home, and going on about our business, like post-Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one can get.
>
>
>
> What losing really means is:
>
>
>
> We would no longer be the premier country in the world. The attacks will not subside, but, rather, will steadily increase. Remember, they want us dead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not have produced an increasing series of attacks against us over the past 18 years. The plan was, clearly, for terrorists to attack us until we were neutered and submissive to them.
>
>
>
> We would, of course, have no future support from other nations, for fear of reprisals and for the reason that they would see; we are impotent and cannot help them.
>
>
>

Chryco Psycho · « **Reply #12 on:** April 18, 2008 - 02:27:59 AM »

> They will pick off the other non-Muslim nations, one at a time. It will be increasingly easier for them. They already hold Spain hostage It doesn't matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw its troops from Iraq Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists bombed their train and told them to withdraw the troops. Anything else they want Spain to do will be done. Spain is finished.
>
>
>
> The next will probably be France Our one hope with France is that they might see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are finished, too, in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without us. However, it may already be too late for France France is already 20% Muslim and fading fast.
>
>
>
> Without our support, Great Britain will go, also. Recently, I read that there are more mosques in England than churches.
>
>
>
> If we lose the war, our production, income, exports, and way of life will all vanish as we know it. After losing, who would trade or deal with us if they were threatened by the Muslims? If we can't stop the Muslim terrorists, how could anyone else?
>
>
>
> The radical Muslims fully know what is riding on this war, and therefore are completely committed to winning, at any cost. We'd better know it, too, and be likewise committed to winning at any cost.
>
>
>
> Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing? Simple. Until we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite and really put 100% of our thoughts and efforts into winning. And it is going to take that 100% effort to win.
>
>
>
> So, how can we lose the war?
>
>
>
> Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the war by 'imploding.' That is, defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the enemy and their purpose and failing to dig in and lend full support to the war effort. If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. If we continue to be divided, there is no way that we can win.
>
>
>
> Let me give you a few examples of how we simply don't comprehend the life and death seriousness of this situation:
>
>
>
> President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation. Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men between 17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow profiling. Does that sound like we are taking this thing seriously? This is war! For the duration, we are going to have to give up some of the civil rights to which we have become accustomed. We had better be prepared to lose some of our civil rights temporarily or we will most certainly lose all of them permanently.
>
>
>
> And don't worry that it is a slippery slope. We gave up plenty of civil rights during WWII, and immediately restored them after the victory and, in fact, added many more since that time.
>
>
>
> Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before him?
>
>
>
> No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our Political Correctness and all of our civil rights during this conflict and have a clean, lawful, honorable war. None of those words apply to war. Get them out of your head.
>
>
>
> Some have gone so far in their criticism of the war and/or the Administration that it almost seems they would literally like to see us lose.
>
>
>
> I think some actually do. I hasten to add that this isn't because they are disloyal. It is because they just don't recognize what losing means. Nevertheless, that conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we are divided and weakening. It concerns our friends and it does great damage to our cause.
>
>
>
> Of more recent vintage, the uproar fueled by the politicians and media regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war perhaps exemplifies best what I am saying. We have recently had an issue involving the treatment of a few Muslim prisoners of war, by a small group of our military police. These are the type prisoners who just a few months ago were throwing their own people off buildings, cutting off their hands, cutting out their tongues, and otherwise murdering their own just for disagreeing with Saddam Hussein.
>
>
>
> And, just a few years ago, these same type prisoners chemically killed 400,000 of their own people for the same reason. They are also the same type of enemy fighters who recently were burning Americans and dragging their charred corpses through the streets of Iraq And, still more recently, the same type of enemy that was and is providing videos to all news sources internationally of the beheading of American prisoners they held.
>
>
>
> Compare this with some of our press and politicians, who for several days have thought and talked about nothing else but the 'humiliating' of some Muslim prisoners -- not burning them, not dragging their charred corpses through the streets, not beheading them, but 'humiliating' them.
>
>
>
> Can they be for real?
>
>
>
> The politicians and pundits have even talked of impeachment of the Secretary of Defense. If this doesn't show the complete lack of comprehension and understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are fighting, the life and death struggle we are in, and the disastrous results of losing this war, nothing can.
>
>
>
> To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over this prisoner issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome burned -- totally oblivious to what is going on in the real world. Neither we, nor any other country, can survive this internal strife. Again, I say, this does not mean that some of our politicians or media people are disloyal. It simply means that they are absolutely oblivious to the magnitude of the situation we are in and into which the Muslim terrorists have been pushing us for many years.
>
>
>
> These people are a serious and dangerous liability to the war effort. We must take note of who they are and get them out of office. Remember, the Muslim terrorists stated goal is to kill all infidels. That translates into ALL non-Muslims -- not just in the United States, but throughout the world. We are the last bastion of defense.
>
>
>
> We have been criticized for many years as being 'arrogant.' That charge is valid. We are arrogant in that we believe that we are so good, powerful, and smart that we can win the hearts and minds of all those who attack us, and that, with both hands tied behind our back, we can defeat anything bad in the world. We can't!
>
>
>
> If we don't recognize this, our nation, as we know it, will not survive, and no other free country in the world will survive if we are defeated.
>
>
>
> And, finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world that allow freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, equal rights for anyone -- let alone everyone, equal status or any status for women, or that have been productive in one single way that contributes to the good of the world.
>
>
>
> This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this war or we will be equated in the history books to the self- inflicted fall of the Roman Empire If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow history books to be written or read.
>
>
>
> If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the Muslims take over France in the next 5 years or less. They will continue to increase the Muslim population of France and continue to encroach, little by little, on the established French traditions.
>
>
>
> The French will be fighting among themselves over what should or should not be done, which will continue to weaken them and keep them from any united resolve. Doesn't that sound eerily familiar?
>
>
>
> Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by some external military force. Instead, they give their freedoms away, politically correct piece by politically correct piece.
>
>
>
> And they are giving those freedoms away to those who have shown, worldwide, that they abhor freedom and will not apply it to you or even to themselves, once they are in power.
>
>
>
> Muslims have universally shown that when they have taken over, they then start brutally killing each other over whom the few will be controlling the masses.
>
>
>
> What is happening in Iraq is a good example. Will we ever stop hearing from the politically correct about the 'peaceful Muslims?'
>
>
>
> I close on a hopeful note by repeating what I said before: If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. I hope now, after the election, the factions in our country will begin to focus on the critical situation we are in, and will unite to save our country. It is your future we are talking about. Do whatever you can to preserve it. I reiterate: our national election is under way.
>
>
>
> After reading the above, we all must do this, not only for ourselves, but for our children, our grandchildren, our country, and our world. Whether Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal .. and that includes the Politicians and media of our country and the free world.
>
>
>
> Please forward this to any you feel may want, or NEED to read it. Our 'leaders' in Congress ought to read it, too There are those who find fault with our country, but it is obvious to anyone who truly thinks through this, that we must UNITE!
>
>
>
>

CHARGER_FAN · « **Reply #13 on:** April 18, 2008 - 08:56:53 PM »

Yep...

moparmaniac59 · « **Reply #14 on:** April 18, 2008 - 10:03:00 PM »

Well put. We need someone to lead like this woman. Who is not afraid to stand up to terrorists and tyrants and call then exactly like what they are & treat them with firm resolve!! Semper Fi!!!

Matt B.

Author Topic: This Lady should run for President! (Read 3379 times)

moparnut

This Lady should run for President!

72hemi

Re: This Lady should run for President!

ChallengerHK

Re: This Lady should run for President!

Grancoupe

Re: This Lady should run for President!

moparnut

Re: This Lady should run for President!

72hemi

Re: This Lady should run for President!

Ornamental

Re: This Lady should run for President!

Ornamental

Re: This Lady should run for President!

Chryco Psycho

Re: This Lady should run for President!

Aussie Challenger

Re: This Lady should run for President!

burnt orange

Re: This Lady should run for President!

Chryco Psycho

Re: This Lady should run for President!

Chryco Psycho

Re: This Lady should run for President!

CHARGER_FAN

Re: This Lady should run for President!

moparmaniac59

Re: This Lady should run for President!