Author Topic: Cheapest year?  (Read 3512 times)

Offline ghoulfish

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
Cheapest year?
« on: August 25, 2008 - 09:27:20 PM »
I'm not sure if this really fits here but - what do you think the cheapest challenger hard top is?
Year, options etc.

Opinions welcome :)
No, I don't own a MOPAR, but I will
Certified Drivers Test Failure :)




Offline 71chally416

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3170
    • The Streetwalker
Re: Cheapest year?
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2008 - 09:38:17 PM »
'72 to '74 with the 318.   :thumbsup: 
Once we had Ronald Reagan, Bob Hope & Johnny Cash. Now we have Obama, No Hope and No Cash!

Offline 67vertman

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5125
  • Member since 9-23-2005
Re: Cheapest year?
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2008 - 09:44:14 PM »
'72 to '74 with the 318.   :thumbsup: 

 :iagree:

Good luck with your search.



Ron - Born and raised in Southern California

I got the 1970 Cuda, but still need the hot blonde to ride shotgun!

First car -1969 Road Runner 383 4sp

Current ride - 1970 Barracuda 440-6 4 sp Dana 60  (4:10)

Offline 72hemi

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4812
  • MEMBER SINCE JANUARY 2006
Re: Cheapest year?
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2008 - 09:59:20 PM »
I would say 74 would be the absolute cheapest.
1972 Dodge Challenger 340 6 Pack 4-speed
1996 Dodge Viper GTS Coupe

Offline ghoulfish

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
Re: Cheapest year?
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2008 - 10:01:15 PM »
Wouldn't the relative rarity drive prices up for 74 Challengers?
No, I don't own a MOPAR, but I will
Certified Drivers Test Failure :)

Offline 360 'CUDA

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5784
Re: Cheapest year?
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2008 - 11:30:31 PM »
'70 HEMI convertible....

seriously

You just have to find a good deal on a basic chassis.  Any '72 to '74 you can get a good deal on.  I don't believe it matters that much between those years.  Then try to weigh how much rust it has and how much bodywork it needs and add that amount to the total.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2008 - 12:47:20 AM by 360cuda »

Offline 72hemi

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4812
  • MEMBER SINCE JANUARY 2006
Re: Cheapest year?
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2008 - 11:45:16 PM »
Wouldn't the relative rarity drive prices up for 74 Challengers?

I think because of the 360 and the large bumper gaurds brings the prices down lower than the 72's. The price between 72-74 isn't any where near as big as compared to 70 or 71 but is noticable.
1972 Dodge Challenger 340 6 Pack 4-speed
1996 Dodge Viper GTS Coupe

Offline 360 'CUDA

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5784
Re: Cheapest year?
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2008 - 12:46:30 AM »
I think because of the 360 and the large bumper gaurds brings the prices down lower than the 72's. The price between 72-74 isn't any where near as big as compared to 70 or 71 but is noticable.

OK but a '72 may have a slant six. Even a 7 1/4 rearend was still available in '72.  These things were gone in '73 and '74 so I think a basic '74 with a 318 and a 8 3/4 is going to be worth more then a basic '72 with a slant and a 7 1 /4'

If all you have to change is a couple of bumpers and brackets the '74 wins every time.  Of course a '72 Challenger Rallye (VIN JS23) would trump them all because no such option is available in '73 or 4. I like the bigger bumpers because I'm sick but I think we can all agree that the rubber bumpers were the way to go and if Mopar had restyled them like Pontiac did for the Firebirds over the years then they might be still selling Challengers...

Oh wait, they are  :bananasmi
« Last Edit: August 26, 2008 - 02:30:25 AM by 360cuda »

Offline 70340e

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 41
Re: Cheapest year?
« Reply #8 on: August 27, 2008 - 05:13:51 PM »
the 1984 dodge challenger so whos going to hate me now :roflsmiley:

Offline wally426ci

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5095
    • maryland mopars
Re: Cheapest year?
« Reply #9 on: August 27, 2008 - 06:24:12 PM »
73 id think....  :chatting:
{OOI====I====IOO}
      '71 Challenger
      [O[]=====[]O]
      '68 D100

Offline MEK-Dangerfield

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 20946
  • I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
Re: Cheapest year?
« Reply #10 on: August 27, 2008 - 07:29:55 PM »
the 1984 dodge challenger so whos going to hate me now :roflsmiley:


Actually, the second generation Challenger ran from 78-83. The 78 model was my first Challenger.  :bricks1:

You would have a real hard time finding any second generation Challenger alive right now.   :grinyes:


  Mike

Mike

1970 Challenger - SOLD
2016 SXT+.  1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.

Offline ghoulfish

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
Re: Cheapest year?
« Reply #11 on: August 29, 2008 - 12:56:33 AM »
Thanks for the input - I'll keep it in mind during my search
Another quick question (you guys know way more than me so I figure I'll take advantage of the resources :) )

I've found this Challenger

 http://calgary.kijiji.ca/c-ViewAd?AdId=62582876&ilqcCatId=122&ilPrev=-1&ilNext=-1&ilIds=70718099%2C62210121%2C67982717%2C55919607%2C66044193%2C66007945%2C66008285%2C64262309%2C63512874%2C62582876&ilqcKeyword=challenger&ilProvider=SearchIdListProvider&mpname=R2S&mpname=Activity-R2S&mpuid=80005%3B122%3B62582876%3B-1268364839%3B%3B&FromEmailAddress=ghoulfish%40gmail.com&MessageId=MSG.VIEW_AD.REPLY_TO_AD_SENT&secev=AQAAARwGnAQAAM0AAAACACIxMWMwY2MzZDViYi5hMGU2NTQ4LjM5OTAzLmZmZmViMTgxAAAAAAO68FwBAAAAAgAAAAHW4G8ALkqTclw65TtvgzkdLGQTh8Diut4*&NotifyMe=unchecked

Wow long link - so how much at face value do you guys think its worth (trying to get more pics at the moment)

It might be a heap but I can use the numbers you give me to continue my search

Again, thanks for spending your time to fill the blanks in my knowledge
No, I don't own a MOPAR, but I will
Certified Drivers Test Failure :)

Offline ChallengerHK

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 7338
  • I'm working on it - No, really
Re: Cheapest year?
« Reply #12 on: August 29, 2008 - 01:17:37 AM »
Just based on the few small pics that are there I'd say that car looks realtively solid.  :2cents:


"She'll make point five past light speed. She may not look like much, but she's got it where it counts, and I've made a lot of special modifications myself."

- Han Solo, Star Wars

Advice Thread - Taking Pictures Of Cars

Offline MEK-Dangerfield

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 20946
  • I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
Re: Cheapest year?
« Reply #13 on: August 29, 2008 - 06:13:35 AM »
I wish there were of few more pics of the car. That driver's side quarter panel looks shot, so the other might be as well. I'd like a closer shot of that rusty roof too. I hope it isn't rotted.


  Mike

Mike

1970 Challenger - SOLD
2016 SXT+.  1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.

Offline 72bluNblu

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1836
Re: Cheapest year?
« Reply #14 on: August 30, 2008 - 02:42:57 AM »
Yup, the quarters will need to be replaced, probably the trunk and floor pans as well. Can't really tell about the roof, but I'd want to crawl underneath and make sure the framerails were solid before I bought it...

Also FYI, I bought my running, driving '72 for 11k. Thats US $, but its all about the same now. It has a small hole in the floorpan and a small soft spot in the driver's rear rail, but the rust on that car looks much worse. Mine may take a small patch or two on the doglegs of the fenders, but no full quarter or fender replacement. I'd want to work the owner down from that price, or keep looking...