Author Topic: 340 cam pick, again...  (Read 10694 times)

Offline 71chally416

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3170
    • The Streetwalker
Re: 340 cam pick, again...
« Reply #30 on: October 18, 2008 - 01:47:44 PM »
I'm sure that I could  :bigsmile:
Once we had Ronald Reagan, Bob Hope & Johnny Cash. Now we have Obama, No Hope and No Cash!




Offline bigfoot

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: 340 cam pick, again...
« Reply #31 on: October 19, 2008 - 02:26:56 PM »
im sorry, is it just me or with the eddy heads, that compression ratio and the general size cams your looking at I think you'd make well OVER 400hp. Im thinking more like 450ish?  Am I wrong?



According to Engine analyzer pro V3.3 an engine design program it's good for 575 horsepower, using Shady Dell Speed shops flow numbers for fully ported edelbrock heads.

Offline Supercuda

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 534
Re: 340 cam pick, again...
« Reply #32 on: October 19, 2008 - 07:22:54 PM »
The desktop dyno is probably pretty close, and the 450 hp number would be with something like "out-of-the-box" heads. As for the ethanol questions, this isn't exactly the place to discuss this, but the literature on E-85 is full of half-truths and lies. I made my change to E-85, as E-100 is not a legal motor fuel (unfortunately). The loss of fuel economy is experienced in an engine that will not run as well on E-85 as it will on gasoline. Cylinder pressure is the key, and many stock engines from the manufacturers do not make the cylinder pressure necessary to efficiently burn this fuel. If I optimized my setup for this fuel, by altering the camshaft timing, or raising compression to 12:1 (if it was wearing aluminum heads, 14:1), the fuel economy and power would both improve even more. An efficiently-running engine makes better fuel economy, no matter the fuel.

Offline imean340

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: 340 cam pick, again...
« Reply #33 on: October 21, 2008 - 02:58:01 PM »
im sorry, is it just me or with the eddy heads, that compression ratio and the general size cams your looking at I think you'd make well OVER 400hp. Im thinking more like 450ish?  Am I wrong?



According to Engine analyzer pro V3.3 an engine design program it's good for 575 horsepower, using Shady Dell Speed shops flow numbers for fully ported edelbrock heads.

Yea, that sounds better...I was guessing for out of box heads with that cam/intake ect... I was getting worried for a minute thinking "man, if he is only shooting for just over 400hp with that setup, my J head and mild cam setup must be like 300hp" lol. Scared the bajesus out of me....just had a flashback of all the times I told someone "yea, hoping she's making almost 400 horse" LOL
Kris
'70 340 challenger- 69 crank and block,  bored .030 over, speed pro forged pistons, eagle forged I beam rods, 2.02/1.60 "J" heads, 3 angle valve job, 230*/230* .480/.480 110LSA cam, Eddy performer manifold, hooker supercomp 1 3/4's headers, Holley 670 street avenger, TACTRANS 727, Protorque converter, 4.56 gears, L60 M/T "I" treads, SS springs, 70/30+50/50 drag shocks---spray coming soon---